Artistic Work Book Derivative Work 
The IPKat
JANUARY 17, 2024
The book that is going to change copyright law? Unlike the Swedish and German referrals, the Romanian one has not been made in the context of a dispute concerning works of applied art (which is refreshing), but rather in relation to the protectability of a critical edition of a work. Călinescu , C-649/23.
The IPKat
JANUARY 25, 2022
Beyond the obvious attempt to draw a connection between the artwork and the book based a shared sense of the "classical", the artwork also seeks to evoke a more specific connection with the contents of the book. You can't judge a book from its cover". True, except when a book and its cover are involved. But of course.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Velocity of Content
JUNE 8, 2022
Preface: I wanted to learn more about the concept (and applications) of “derivative works” and adaptations under copyright law, and I was searching for a useful example that might also be interesting for readers of Velocity of Content to read about. All copyrights, except one, expire.*.
Copyright Lately
JANUARY 23, 2023
In addition, the original images scanned into those databases, unlike Google’s display of book snippets, are never shown to end users. This arguably makes the use of copyrighted works by by Stable Diffusion even more transformative than Google Book Search. You’d be wrong. The Copyright Act Definition is Broad, But. 17 U.S.C. §
IP and Legal Filings
OCTOBER 8, 2023
It states that the following classes of works are copyrightable- Original literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works; Cinematograph films, and Sound recording The term ‘artistic work’ is defined under Section 2(c) of the Act. Nevertheless, it was explained in the case of Eastern Book Company v.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JUNE 20, 2023
Legal Background: Copyright and Derivative Works Copyright law protects original works of authorship, including “pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works,” 17 U.S.C. For obvious reasons, the copyright in a photograph does not include the right to publicly perform the copyrighted work.
LexBlog IP
FEBRUARY 28, 2022
13] Instead, the Second Circuit held that the differences between the works are more akin to the differences between a novel and an adaptation of that novel—“a paradigmatic example” of a derivative work that would require a license. [14]. It found that all four fair use factors weighed against fair use. [12] Prince , 714 F.3d
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
137 
Let's personalize your content