Remove Artistic Work Remove Blogging Remove Marketing
article thumbnail

How A Century-Old Insight of Photography Can Inform Legal Questions of AI-Generated Artwork (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

A new breed of artists is using generative artificial intelligence tools like DALLĀ·E, Midjourney, Firefly, and ChatGPT to create artistic works. Do these creations belong to the artists or the public domain? Do creators who use generative AI maintain copyright in their creations? By guest blogger Prof.

Artwork 98
article thumbnail

[Guest Post] The wisdom of Dune and copyright litigation

The IPKat

The author argues that copyright holders would do well to heed this wisdom before entering into litigation, as exemplified by a recent decision from the Swedish Patent and Market Court in case PMT 2401-21.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Bombay High Court Rules that Copyright Registration of a Label is not Compulsory

Kashishipr

Under Section 2(c) of The Copyright Act of 1957 , the label is an original artistic work. Since then, it has been continuously used and has even acquired reputation and goodwill in the market. As per NTC’s statement, both SSPL and SK Oil Industries couldn’t claim copyright in the artistic work.

article thumbnail

Protection of Jewellery under Intellectual Property Rights

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

Section 2(c) of the Copyright Act 1957 states that a copyright covers what is referred to as an artistic work, when interpreted in relation to the protection of jewellery through intellectual property, it may be deemed that the initial artistic sketch on which the design is based will be subject to copyright protection.

article thumbnail

U.S. Supreme Court Vindicates Photographer But Destabilizes Fair Use ā€” Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Addressing Factor 4, it asserted there was little or no market harm, because ā€œtime-shifting merely enables a viewer to see ā€¦ a work which he had been invited to witness in its entirety free of charge.ā€ ( Id. This is the familiar four-factor test for fair use. at 450) (Skipping commercials was not yet feasible, id.

article thumbnail

Yearbook Defendants Lose Two More Section 230 Rulings

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

I’ve blogged three yearbook cases so far this year ( Callahan v. Ancestry ), and today I’ll blog two more. Now you can see why this case festered in my blog queue for 6 weeks. Blogging it has been rough! Prior blog posts on Yearbook and Related Cases. Ancestry , Knapke v. Classmates , and Sessa v.

article thumbnail

Dragons' Den IP Blog - Series 21 Episode 14

Dragons' Den

The length of copyright depends on the type of work. For artistic work copyright protection lasts 70 years after the authorā€™s death. There isnā€™t a register of copyright works in the UK. As a result, marketing has been done but on a limited budget.