Remove Artistic Work Remove Blog Remove Ownership Remove Public Domain
article thumbnail

How A Century-Old Insight of Photography Can Inform Legal Questions of AI-Generated Artwork (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

A new breed of artists is using generative artificial intelligence tools like DALLĀ·E, Midjourney, Firefly, and ChatGPT to create artistic works. Do these creations belong to the artists or the public domain? Do creators who use generative AI maintain copyright in their creations? By guest blogger Prof.

Artwork 96
article thumbnail

Copyright Registration in India

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

Copyright registration in India ensures protection for various types of works, such as literary works (e.g., books, articles, poems), artistic works (e.g., paintings, photographs, sculptures), musical works, cinematographic films, sound recordings, computer programs, and many more.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Canadaā€™s First AI-Authored Copyright Registration Paints a Picture of Uncertainty

IPilogue

In September 2021, the IPilogue reported that Indiaā€™s copyright office recognized the RAGHAV Painting App (ā€œRAGHAVā€), an artificial intelligence (ā€œAIā€) tool, as an author of the copyright-protected artistic work, Suryast.

article thumbnail

Generative AI, Digital Constitutionalism and Copyright: Towards a Statutory Remuneration Right grounded in Fundamental Rights ā€“ Part 1

Kluwer Copyright Blog

Image from DALL-E 3 Introduction Generative AI is disrupting the creative process(es) of intellectual works on an unparalleled scale. More and more AI systems offer services that push usersā€™ production capacity for new literary and artistic works beyond unforeseen barriers. ChatGPT , Smodin ), to perform music (i.e.,

Copyright 121
article thumbnail

Artificial intelligence and intellectual property rights: the USPTO DABUS decision

Barry Sookman

These corresponding decisions are summarized in a blog post written by Alfred Macchione and Ben Lai of Mccarthy Tetrault. Second, whether the creator of a program that generates an original output with only negligible contribution to the workā€™s originality by the program developer is eligible for copyright protection.