This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) today released an official Artificial Intelligence Strategy aimed at outlining the challenges faced by the Office both internally and externally, as the reach of AI impacts all aspects of innovation and society.
In September of last year, and in light of a corresponding Japanese patent infringement suit, I published an article detailing how The Pokmon Company had filed two patentapplications at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) after the release of Palworld.
Stewart affirming the Eastern District of Virginias dismissal of Odyssey Logistics Appointments Clause challenge to an examiner rejection of its patentapplication covering online systems for freight management. Patent and Trademark Offices (USPTO) rejection of its patentapplication.
Suppose that you have an invention disclosure for a design of an article that you want to protect. When you review the invention disclosure, you notice that the design is ornamental, for example, a pattern, on an article such as a chair. You want to file a patentapplication to protect the design. The answer is YES.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in a precedential decision today vacated a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) finding that certain claims of Google, LLC’s U.S. PatentApplication No. 14/628,093 were obvious. The CAFC opinion, authored by Chief Judge Moore, said the U.S.
The Story Till Now On one hand, COVID-19 cases are rising yet again to everyone’s surprise, and on the other, the surprises from the Covaxin patentapplication don’t seem to stop. BBIL then did a quick about-face on this application and issued a clarification on June 22 that they would be refiling with proper credits to ICMR.
For inventors seeking to patent inventions involving biological resources, the Act mandates obtaining approval from the National Biodiversity Authority (NBA). This article explores the key aspects of the BDA, the role of NBA, and the process for obtaining the necessary approvals.
Numerous articles have already explored large language models like ChatGPT and what they can and cannot do -- as well as the broad impact of such models on the legal profession. By: McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP
The EPO Guidelines for Examination require the description of a patentapplication to summarise the background art ( F-II-4.3 ). The patent as granted ( EP2657138 ) related to a food product handling system (e.g. a burger patty production line). Nevertheless, the description and drawings shall be used to interpret the claims ".
Focus on what matters most So much can be said, and has been said, about the patentapplication process. To avoid information overload, let’s get back to the most basic things you need to know to file a patentapplication. Apply for design or utility patent? It can feel overwhelming.
We’re pleased to bring to our readers a 2 part post by Amit Tailor on the recent case Nippon A&L vs The Controller of Patents, which looked into questions of how and to what extent a claim in a patentapplication can be amended under the Patents Act. vs. THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS [ C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT)
This article is Part Two of a Three-Part Article Series. Artificial intelligence is changing industry and society, and metrics at the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) reflect its impact. However, subject matter eligibility can be a significant challenge in securing patents on artificial intelligence and machine learning.
Continuing on from the previous blogpost , we bring you part 2 of Amit Tailor’s two part series on the recent case Nippon A&L vs The Controller of Patents, which looked into questions of how and to what extent a claim in a patentapplication can be amended under the Patents Act. Author: Amit Tailor.
This article is Part Three of a Three-Part Article Series. Artificial intelligence is changing industry and society, and metrics at the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) reflect its impact. However, subject matter eligibility can be a significant challenge in securing patents on artificial intelligence and machine learning.
According to Article 27 of the Chinese Patent Law, where a patentapplication for a design is filed, documents such as a request, drawings or photographs of the design and a brief description of the design shall be submitted. By: Linda Liu & Partners
New Patently-O Law Journal article by Colleen V. As the America Invents Act (AIA) turns 10, patent students across the country may be asking: if the law is already a decade old, why am I spending so much time learning pre-AIA law? Figure 2: 2021 Pending PatentApplications Pre- vs. Post-AIA (Point Estimate).
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), discussing the issue of inconsistent statements made by patentapplicants pursuant to their disclosure requirements at the USPTO and other federal agencies, especially the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
We all know that a patentapplication can be a significant asset to a company and its valuation. However, too many companies mistakenly believe that all software is not patentable. As a result, they are failing to file patentapplications that can provide value now, as well as in the future.
As such, AI has been shown to have near endless applications, driving a surge of inventions and related patentapplication filings. Many AI-based systems are able to recognize trends, patterns and connections, test hypotheses using available data sets, and continuously improve decision trees based on user input.
Under PPH, prosecution of a patentapplication previously filed with a participating patent office can be fast-tracked in another participating patent office if the patentapplication meets certain requirements. In contrast, an average time to prosecute non-PPH patentapplications is approximately 22.7
The rules introduce claim fees and a continued examination scheme to Canadian patent practice and are similar to draft rules published for public comment in 2021 and discussed in our previous article. By: Smart & Biggar
The China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) released a draft of new measures that would downgrade the ratings of Chinese patent agencies that approve abnormal or fraudulent patents. CNIPA released the draft on October 8, which expands on a trial started in January 2022 in four provinces.
New Patently-O Law Journal article by Colleen V. As the America Invents Act (AIA) turns 10, patent students across the country may be asking: if the law is already a decade old, why am I spending so much time learning pre-AIA law? Figure 2: 2021 Pending PatentApplications Pre- vs. Post-AIA (Point Estimate).
The crux of the Treaty is an international disclosure requirement related to genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources in patentapplications. The requirement is not retroactive (Article 4). No reservations are permitted (Article 20). R.I.P. the Patent Bargain?
While litigators and patent portfolio managers are immediately feeling the impact in Europe, surprisingly, they should also expect an impact on information disclosure statement (IDS) strategy for U.S. patentapplications.
In order to provide for all alternative scenarios in respect of AI innovation, the applicant submitted an auxiliary request according to which a natural person was indicated to have "the right to the European Patent by virtue of being the owner and creator of" the artificial intelligence system DABUS.
The Exclusion of ICMR from the PatentApplication Last weekend, a series of unusual developments regarding the Covaxin patent (PatentApplication Number: 202041007559) generated significant buzz. On its own, this does not necessarily indicate any reason for raising eyebrows.
Patents that are expected to protect a company’s most valuable innovations must stake a claim to that innovation and be equipped to defend it. This is because being worthy of patent protection doesn’t guarantee that an application’s claims to an innovation will not be rejected and rights to that innovation jeopardized.
Legal Background: Sufficiency of disclosure for second medical use claims Under established EPO practice, the assessment of sufficiency under Article 83 EPC requires that a skilled person be able to reproduce the claimed invention using the teaching of the patentapplication as filed and common general knowledge.
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) office actions on the merits, a patentapplicant has the option to appeal the patent examiner’s decision rejecting one or more claims to a higher forum, i.e., the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). After two or more U.S. Why make this request? What are the pros and cons?
A key aspect of the Basic Proposal is an international disclosure requirement for patentapplications (Article 3): For inventions [ materially/directly ] based on genetic resources, applicants would be required to disclose the country of origin, or if that is unknown, the source of the genetic resources.
The general rule is that utility patents expire 20 years from the filing date of the earliest nonprovisional application in the patent family. Notice that a provisional patentapplication does not reduce the term of a utility patent.
The Board of Appeal had previously announced its decision to refuse two European patentapplications naming an algorithm ("DABUS") as the sole inventor at the end of last year ( IPKat ). Thus, contrary to the recent Nature article on this topic, AI is not breaking patent law.
Cloudbreak Therapeutics, LLC addresses whether an IPR petitioner can assert Article III standing on appeal based on potential infringement liability and potential preclusive effects on its patents. 10,149,820 (the “’820 patent”), which is directed to compositions and methods for treating pterygium.
This week in Other Barks & Bites: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) notifies 61,000 trademark applicants of a data breach; USPTO Director Kathi Vidal admonishes VLSI; and the European Patent Office (EPO) announces a 2.5% increase in patentapplications.
Many patentapplications are not fully reduced-to-practice by the time the patentapplication is filed. Although reduction-to-practice is a required element of invention, the Courts and Patent Office have long permitted the filing of a patentapplication to constructively satisfy the RTP requirement.
Last month, the United States Patent and Trademark Office published Supplemental Guidance for examination of design patentapplications related to computer-generated electronic images. As noted by the USPTO, the guidance does not provide any new practice or procedure but.
The cover article of the May 2024 edition of the CIPA Journal proposed a new test for inventive step using AI. The article was inspired by the EPO's AI assisted search tool, AI-PreSearch. The model could be used to search the whole application or parts of it, such as the claims.
In response to public comments submitted in response to its request thereof regarding the “article of manufacture” requirement for design patent eligibility appearing in Title 35, United States Code, Section 171, and as explained in our previous post, the U.S.
Yvon Chouinard, Let My People Go Surfing: The Education of a Reluctant Businessman- In a design patentapplication, “the subject matter which is claimed is the design embodied in or applied to an article of manufacture (or portion thereof) and not the article itself.”. By: Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC
The Board of Appeal in this latest decision explicitly disagreed with T 1989/18 , and found legal basis for adaptation of the description in line with the claims in Article 84 EPC and Article 69 EPC. Supporters of the description amendment requirement point to Article 84 EPC and Article 69 EPC.
Madelaine published this article as a requirement for her internship at ventureLAB. The article was originally published on October 15, 2021, as part of ventureLAB’s 101 Series. This article is the fourth in a 5-part series on protecting your intellectual property. Part 3: Filling for a Patent or Trademark, What Can I Expect?
A referral on the co/joint applicants approach to priority has long been expected ( IPKat ), and the new referrals will hopefully provide some much legal clarity on this issue. The patentee's argument that a PCT joint applicants approach should be taken was thus rejected.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content