IP Watchdog

MAY 14, 2023

Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) finding that AI cannot be considered a named inventor to a patent application remains the law of the land. The issue of AI inventorship in the United States remains at large following the Supreme Court’s denial of cert in Thaler v. Vidal, meaning that the U.S.

Patent Law 128

Patent Law Law Inventor Patent 128

Patently-O

MAY 15, 2024

” The dissenters saw a fundamental distinction between a patentee’s exclusive rights in the patented invention itself versus contractual rights in unpatented articles used with the invention. Lexmark argued that these restrictions should be enforceable through patent law, similar to the reasoning in A.B.

Patent Law 111

Patent Law Patent Law Invention 111

The IPKat

JULY 30, 2024

The natural person can then be named an inventor on the patent application. Absent the advent of Artificial General Intelligence, patent inventorship thus remains within the human realm. 2022) found "that only a natural person can be an inventor, so AI cannot be".

Inventor 78

Inventor Invention Designs Design 78

IP Watchdog

JANUARY 13, 2025

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on Monday, January 13, issued a precedential decision denying a state law conversion claim as being preempted by patent law and rejecting BearBox LLC owner Austin Storms bid to be named a sole or joint inventor on Lancium LLCs patent.

Inventor 64

Inventor Patent Patent Law Designs 64

IPilogue

JUNE 2, 2022

Reversing what seemed like a victory for supporters of AI-owned intellectual property, the full bench of the Federal Court of Australia has confirmed the majority view of the world: only human inventors can own patent rights to their creations. What Does This Mean in the Canadian Context? In Apotex Inc v Wellcome Foundation.,

Invention 110

Invention Ownership Intellectual Property Inventor 110

IP Watchdog

SEPTEMBER 16, 2021

During IPWatchdog LIVE 2021 in Dallas, Texas, I asked a handful of willing attendees for their thoughts on the impact of the America Invents Act (AIA) in anticipation of today, the ten-year anniversary of the day President Barack Obama signed the AIA into law. patent laws. innovation.

Invention 124

Invention Inventor IP Patent Law 124

IP Watchdog

AUGUST 8, 2022

The August 2019 announcement that two patent applications had been filed naming an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm as an inventor in the United States and a dozen other countries was regarded as disruptive and profound at the time. It was one of the hot topics in patent law during those last few months before the pandemic.

Non-Fungible Tokens 119

Non-Fungible Tokens Inventor Patent Application Patent Law 119

Patently-O

AUGUST 4, 2021

A world first – South Africa recently made headlines by granting a patent for ‘a food container based on fractal geometry’ to a non-human inventor, namely an artificial intelligence (AI) machine called DABUS. Each of these three jurisdictions found sufficient reasons in these formalities to reject DABUS’ patent applications.

Invention 128

Invention Patent Inventor Intellectual Property 128

The IPKat

JULY 30, 2021

Thus, the GPA will henceforth include an explicit proportionality defense to permanent injunctions in patent law. Reportedly, several German patent judges immediately commented along similar lines [ here ]. here , at 5]; novel generations of pharmaceuticals that make prior patent clearance difficult [e.g. here and here ].

Patent Law 95

Patent Law Law Patent Intellectual Property 95

Intepat

DECEMBER 24, 2021

The question then becomes whether these AI-generated inventions are patentable under present patent law. In our previous blog post, we explained how the EPO released its judgment outlining the reasons for the rejection of two European patent applications in which an AI system was named as the inventor. BACKGROUND.

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Patent Application Designs 52

Patently-O

JULY 9, 2024

Lemley and Lisa Larrimore Ouellette of Stanford Law School. Two of the most controversial patent law changes of the past year have involved obviousness-type double patenting, which allows applicants to patent obvious variants of their earlier patents by disclaiming the extra term of the later-expiring patent.

Patent 119

Patent Invention Inventor Litigation 119

IP Watchdog

AUGUST 4, 2022

The only president ever to obtain one, Abraham Lincoln knew the essential role patents have played in the scientific and technological innovations that have driven American growth and prosperity since the founding of the republic. Patents have “peculiar value…in facilitating all other inventions and discoveries,” he said in a speech in 1858.

Invention 140

Invention Inventor Patent Law Technology 140

JIPEL Copyright Blog

NOVEMBER 12, 2021

As a result, patent offices and courts all over the world must now consider whether AI can be a patent inventor. Both the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and U.S. federal courts have found that AI generated inventions are not patentable. Constitution and modern patent law provisions.

Inventor 45

Inventor Patent Invention Patent Law 45

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

JUNE 14, 2022

Moritz Ammelburg and Peter Fasse examine the patentability requirements and prosecution schemes in the US and Europe and how applicants can prepare applications that will best serve their needs in both jurisdictions. Read the full article on Managing IP. PDF copy available. Practice tip. Right of priority.

Patent Prosecution 75

Patent Prosecution Invention Inventor Patent 75

JD Supra Law

AUGUST 29, 2022

The first paragraph of Article 15 of the Patent Law stipulates: "The organization which has been granted patent rights shall reward the inventor or designer of a service invention-creation; upon implementation of the patent for the invention-creation, the inventor or designer shall be given reasonable remuneration according to the scope of promoted (..)

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Patent Designs 52

The IPKat

DECEMBER 31, 2021

The EPO has launched a user consultation on grace periods for patents, the results of which will be published in early 2022 ( EPO press release ). The EPC as it currently stands does not permit a grace period in which inventors may disclose their invention without prejudicing a future patent filing. 102(b)(1)(A) ).

Patent 132

Patent Inventor Patent Application Art 132

IP Watchdog

AUGUST 10, 2021

March 16, 2013 marked a watershed date in the practice of patent law as the effective date of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). Not surprisingly, there were a number of patent applications filed that bridged the March 16, 2013 AIA effective date.

Invention 124

Invention Inventor Patent Application Patent Law 124

SpicyIP

JANUARY 30, 2024

or false advertising – the defendant claims to be the ‘inventor of Butter Chicken and Dal Makhani’; or is there an actual ‘invention’ in question – owners of both restaurants call themselves ‘inventors’ of the dish? They claim to be the ‘true and first inventors’. This claim has raised the hackles of the Gujrals.

False Advertising 116

False Advertising Social Media Inventor Advertising 116

IP Watchdog

APRIL 15, 2022

patent law. patent law.

Inventor 116

Inventor Copyright Patent Application Patent 116

LexBlog IP

JULY 26, 2022

PatentNext Summary: The Legal Board of Appeal (the “Board”) of the European Patent Office (EPO) recently suggested that the owner of an artificial intelligence (AI) machine could possibly be listed as an inventor of an AI-generated Invention. ” J 8/20 (Designation of inventor/DABAS) at para.

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Designs Design 52

The IPKat

AUGUST 11, 2023

In keeping with the so-called media "silly season" of late summer, PatKat thought she would check-in on the AI inventor debate. The Supreme Court is merely considering whether an AI may be formally designated as an inventor on a UK patent. Final thoughts It is an adage of the legal profession that bad cases make bad law.

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Law Ownership 52

Patently-O

OCTOBER 31, 2022

George Washington University Law School Professor Dmitry Karshtedt has passed. We often had different ways of thinking about patent law, and I always hoped that some day we might have time to write something together. His legal scholarship was deep and contemplative, and includes two articles published in the Iowa Law Review.

Inventor 110

Inventor Law Patent Law Publishing 110

LexBlog IP

MAY 31, 2023

part of a patent claim), does the AI system need to be listed as an “inventor”? patent law, an inventor is one who contributes to the conception of at least one claim element of a given patent claim (i.e., patent law. Patent Law requires all inventor(s) to be listed.

Inventor 40

Inventor Patent Application Invention Patent 40

Patently-O

OCTOBER 11, 2021

US Inventor Inc. In February 2021, US Inventor and others collectively sued the USPTO asking the court to order the USPTO to issue rulemaking regarding discretionary considerations at the institution stage of AIA Trials. In addition to this statutory injury requirement the Supreme Court has also interpreted Article III of the U.S.

Inventor 80

Inventor Patent Law Law Patent 80

IPilogue

NOVEMBER 3, 2022

The balance that patent law seeks to achieve is well known, with Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 , of the United States Constitution defining the purpose “to promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries.”

Patent Infringement 115

Patent Infringement Law Patent Ownership 115

The IPKat

AUGUST 13, 2024

The patent system is a well-established, robust and effective way to protect innovation, and it makes sense for OpenAI to make full use of it. Further reading Artificial intelligence is not breaking patent law: EPO publishes DABUS decision (J 8/20) (July 2022) Bad cases make bad law: Has DABUS "the AI inventor" actually invented anything?

Patent 127

Patent Editing Inventor Patent Application 127

Kashishipr

OCTOBER 20, 2021

On the other hand, international trade law recognizes that where a unique problem arises specifically referable only to a particular field of technology, a solution applying sui generis only to that field of technology cannot be said to be discriminatory according to the ordinary meaning and purpose of the TRIPS Agreement.

Patent 105

Patent Intellectual Property Inventor Government 105

IP and Legal Filings

NOVEMBER 7, 2022

In the fast growing economy, innovation is necessary for businesses and Patents as an intellectual property rights protects that innovation. Intellectual property rights provide a negative right in other words a monopoly right to the creator or Inventor over their creation or Invention. 7] Section 140 of The Patents Act, 1970. [8]

Patent Law 52

Patent Law Law Patent Intellectual Property 52

Patently-O

SEPTEMBER 18, 2023

Although various scientists had proposed mechanisms for using this information, the evidence shows more than a decade of failed ideas, and at least one article reported that the process is “difficult and impractical.” For me, the case is largely about the strong presumption that the listed inventors are correct. Apple Inc.,

Patent 119

Patent Invention Inventor Law 119

IP and Legal Filings

DECEMBER 19, 2024

The Court determined that an underlying principle of patent law was that only if it had been novel and useful could an invention be issued and would thereby necessarily both be unique and useful. Articles from The Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (Oxford University Press).

Technology 52

Technology Invention Patent Intellectual Property 52

Patently-O

MAY 24, 2023

Bagley , Asa Griggs Candler Professor of Law, Emory University School of Law, co-inventor, and Principal, Diversity Pilots Initiative. Watch her video for Invent Together , entitled Challenges Encountered as a Diverse Inventor.

Inventor 85

Inventor Intellectual Property Invention Blogging 85

JD Supra Law

JUNE 6, 2023

Article 26.3 of the Chinese Patent Law prescribes that the description should be sufficiently clear. By: Linda Liu & Partners

Inventor 55

Inventor Patent Patent Law Law 55

Patently-O

MAY 21, 2024

In utility patents, the test for analogous arts has two prongs, with the reference qualifying as prior art if either prong is met: Whether the prior art is from the same field of endeavor as the claimed invention, regardless of the problem addressed by the reference.

Design Patent 119

Design Patent Designs Design Patent 119

Patently-O

FEBRUARY 13, 2023

Then came the patenting. Sywula was excluded from being listed as an inventor on the patents, including US11087250 and US11087252; and that was upsetting. In patent law, inventorship is tied directly to ownership. An inventor is a presumptive owner of any resulting patent rights. July 26, 2022).

Inventor 75

Inventor Ownership Invention Patent 75

Kashishipr

DECEMBER 8, 2021

It is very important to assess the same, morally, ethically, and legally, in the light of accepted norms laid by the Patent Laws in different major jurisdictions. However, others are in favor of patenting life forms by accrediting the Patent System’s capability to benefit society.

Patent 105

Patent Intellectual Property Invention Ownership 105

IPilogue

JANUARY 10, 2022

Madelaine Lynch is a 3L JD Candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School, enrolled in Professor David Vaver’s 2021-2022 Intellectual Property Law & Technology Intensive Program. This article was written in affiliation with Madelaine’s placement at ventureLAB and published December 17, 2021, as part of ventureLAB’s IP Deep Dive Series.

Invention 104

Invention Patent Intellectual Property IP 104

IP Watchdog

NOVEMBER 2, 2022

Eagle Forum Education and Legal Defense Fund and the Fair Inventing Fund filed briefs in support of the jump rope company while DivX filed in support of neither party.

Inventor 69

Inventor Invention Patent Infringement Patent Law 69