This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
It's the first major AI fairuse decision. The post Judge Rules Against FairUse Defense for AI Company appeared first on Plagiarism Today. A judge has ruled against Ross Intelligence, an AI company, in their case against Thomson Reuters.
The Eighth Circuit has upheld a jury verdict finding that the commercial use of a meme was not fairuse. The post Success Kid: Copyright, FairUse and Memes appeared first on Plagiarism Today. However, it's not a complete win.
Richard Prince has agreed to pay two photographers whose work he used in his art. Here's what it means for fairuse moving forward. The post Richard Prince and the Future of FairUse appeared first on Plagiarism Today.
In a case involving clips from an Andrew Dice Clay comedy special, the Copyright Claims Board has found a documentary was a fairuse. The post Copyright Claims Board Finds Documentary was FairUse appeared first on Plagiarism Today.
The Copyright Claims Board is on track to decide a case that deals with fairuse, the controversial comedian Andrew Dice Clay. The post FairUse, Andrew Dice Clay and the CCB appeared first on Plagiarism Today.
Here's what it says and what it means for fairuse moving forward. The post How the Warhol Ruling Could Change FairUse appeared first on Plagiarism Today. The Supreme Court has handed down its decision in the Andy Warhol case.
The Copyright Claims Board has ruled in favor of two podcasters in a bitter battle over fairuse and a TikTok video. The post Do We Know Them Podcasters Win FairUse CCB Case appeared first on Plagiarism Today.
Why is it acceptable for Carolyn Keene to be a pseudonym for over a dozen authors penning Nancy Drew stories, but not ok for Cristiane Serruya to use ghostwriters when producing books with her name (outside the fact the books were plagiarized from other sources). The answer is that plagiarism is complicated.
On Tuesday, journalist Robert Kolker published an article in the New York Times Magazine entitled Who is the Bad Art Friend? This prompted Dorland to first report the alleged plagiarism to a wide variety of groups and worked on getting the story pulled while working through lawyers to demand financial compensation.
The reason is that the track has faced not one, but two separate allegations of plagiarism, with many fans and critics alike wondering if the band may have run afoul of copyright law. However, this turned out to be more of a licensing than a traditional plagiarism issue. The challenge is determining what is plagiarism and what is not.
The Copyright Claims Board has handed three more determinations, including one fairuse issue and two questions on damages. The post 3 New Copyright Claims Board Decisions appeared first on Plagiarism Today.
appeared first on Plagiarism Today. A new study published in the Harvard Business Review examines the impact of AI systems on human creators. The answers are not encouraging. The post Does AI Replace Human Creators?
I believe that Winston & Strawn will eventually prevail based upon a fairuse defense, but it is still an embarrassing situation for the firm and attorneys involved. In this case, HLG alleges that Winston & Strawn plagiarized a motion to dismiss that HLG had filed on behalf of a client in an earlier consolidated patent case.
The post What the Warhol Ruling May Mean for AI appeared first on Plagiarism Today. The Andy Warhol ruling is less than a week old, but the Supreme Court may have just shaken the world of artificial intelligence to its core.
The post 5 Takeaways from the Internet Archive Ruling appeared first on Plagiarism Today. Yesterday, the Internet Archive lost its appeal in its case against book publishers. Here's what you need to know.
The post 3 New and Interesting Cases Before the Copyright Claims Board appeared first on Plagiarism Today. As such, we're taking a look at three new and interesting cases being heard by it.
The post Axanar Creator Faces New Legal Threat appeared first on Plagiarism Today. Axanar creator Alec Peters is facing fresh legal peril as CBS and Paramount seek to enforce a $300,000 arbitration judgement against him.
The post Why The Kat Von D Ruling is Confusing appeared first on Plagiarism Today. Recently, Kat Von D won a key jury verdict in a trial over a tattoo. However, it has many copyright watchers scratching their heads.
The post The First Major Impact of the Warhol Ruling appeared first on Plagiarism Today. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has just handed down a ruling that highlights how much of a shift the SCOTUS Warhol ruling is causing.
The post 4 More Contested Cases Before the Copyright Claims Board appeared first on Plagiarism Today. The Copyright Claims Board is seeing a sharp rise in contested cases, here's four of the latest and most interesting to receive a response.
In that ruling, the Supreme Court found that Google’s use of the code was, ultimately, a fairuse and did so with language that seemed to many to be extremely broad. Oracle case had no bearing on this one or any fairuse analysis in an “artistic” context. At least not broadly. Bottom Line.
The Appeals Court ruled against the Warhol estate finding that the images in question were not a fairuse. The post 3 Count: Warhol Battle appeared first on Plagiarism Today. However, the estate appealed to the Supreme Court, which heard oral arguments yesterday. 2: Textile Designer Sues Zulily for Copyright Infringement.
The post The Case Against Roy Lichtenstein appeared first on Plagiarism Today. A recent documentary about Roy Lichtenstein looks at his appropriations. Was he an artistic genius, a plagiarist, or both?
The lawsuit was filed by photographer Elliot McGucken, who claimed that Newsweek infringed his copyright by embedding an Instagram post of his on their site as part of a news article. The court, in this case, rejected the test as well as Newsweek’s fairuse arguments. The terms of the settlement have not been disclosed.
Costumes are considered “usefularticles” and, similar to most of the fashion industry , does not qualify for any kind of copyright protection. . First, design elements that are “physically or conceptually separate” from the article can be protected. However, commercial use of costumes still raises legal questions.
According to the lawsuit, Nicklen uploaded a viral video of a starving polar bear that Sinclair embedded into a news article about the video. The judge also ruled against Sinclair on the issue of fairuse, saying that it was too early in the case to rule on that issue. The case was filed by Paul Nicklen against Sinclair Media.
Un)FairUse and Other Questions. This hurts uses that, according to most people, would likely be considered a fairuse and non-infringing. This means that it can be very difficult and even unreliable to use third party content on sites monitored by bots. Even if that use is a probable fairuse.
The post Update: 4 Copyright Claims Board Cases to Watch appeared first on Plagiarism Today. In September, we looked at four Copyright Claims Board cases to watch. Now we're revisiting them and seeing what's happened with them.
The post xQc and the 2023 Reaction Video Controversy appeared first on Plagiarism Today. Streamer and YouTuber xQc is under fire for his reaction videos. Here's why it's not the first such battle and why this may be different.
FairUse: Since the questions at issue only make up a small portion of the textbooks at issue, Chegg may argue fairuse. To make matters worse for Chegg, companies engaged in behavior seen as “unethical” by the courts, often struggle to make fairuse arguments.
The Assess Tool also provides a basic fairuse analysis and helps to make sure that the use isn’t covered under any other exceptions to copyright law. As such, RightsClick is not a shortcut for bloggers and online journalists to quickly register and protect their articles.
Last week, Moss summarized the history of the case in an article that is well worth reading. Implied License – Second, Take-Two could have argued that, by placing the tattoo on Randy Orton, that Alexander granted an implied license for it to be used as part of his image, including on TV, film and video games.
” The case raises questions of fairuse and whether the new paintings were transformative enough to be non-infringing or if they were simply derivative works. In addition to the above fairuse issues, there is also one other to consider: The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). 3: The Andy Warhol Ruling.
In some 610 cases, Reddit declined to remove the work due to, what they claim, is fairuse. Reasonable people can and do disagree about what is and is not fairuse. This includes people using the copyright system for non-copyright issues, failing to clearly identify the work at issue and filing against non-Reddit content.
This, in turn, raises questions of fairuse and those types of cases are often long, drawn out, expensive and difficult to predict. In short, fairuse is largely subjective and there is a great deal of uncertainty when heading into such a case.
As was pointed out in this excellent article in The Verge , there is no legal precedent here. According to the court, Google’s use was transformative enough to be a fairuse. Is it so short that its use is a fairuse? Unfortunately, the real answer is that no one actually knows. Is it identical?
Rules around fairuse, notice and takedown and so forth are replaced by bots that are incapable of understanding the nuances of the law itself. Back when I first launched Plagiarism Today in 2005, the internet was a very different place. The post We Need to Rethink YouTube appeared first on Plagiarism Today.
However, that required working with Patreon, which previously had used Vimeo as a video hosting partner for their users. In an article from The Verge , other Vimeo uploaders, primarily those that used it through Patreon, were facing similar issues. the data used in order to deliver your videos to viewers).
Is this relevant to fairuse? Satire involves using the same style to clothe different ideas; therefore it shouldn’t infringe (lack of substantial similarity as in the Greatest American Hero case; German case law; perhaps the jury’s reasoning in the Kat von D case). W/o fairuse, these tools are far more limited.
” Second, Bayside said that copyright already accommodates First Amendment considerations via the fairuse defense (citing the Reddit case ). Nature of the use. The photos were already published, which weighs in favor of fairuse. ” This also weighs in favor of fairuse (?). Amount taken.
Newspapers Sue OpenAI and Microsoft The New York Daily News, Chicago Tribune, Orlando Sentinel, Sun-Sentinel, Mercury News, Denver Post, Pioneer Press, and Orange County Register, claim that the AI companies used their publications to train and develop ChatGPT models without obtaining permission.
Newspapers Sue OpenAI and Microsoft The New York Daily News, Chicago Tribune, Orlando Sentinel, Sun-Sentinel, Mercury News, Denver Post, Pioneer Press, and Orange County Register, claim that the AI companies used their publications to train and develop ChatGPT models without obtaining permission.
Right now, the fairuse questions around software make it difficult to predict how a court might rule. The post The Ethical and Legal Challenges of GitHub Copilot appeared first on Plagiarism Today.
Top articles will receive exciting prizes and certificates in recognition of their work. Analysing the impact of Indian copyright law on fairuse in academic and critical writing. Evaluating the doctrine of fairuse for Indian social media platforms in light of global cases. The use of AI is strictly prohibited.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content