This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Suppose that you have an invention disclosure for a design of an article that you want to protect. When you review the invention disclosure, you notice that the design is ornamental, for example, a pattern, on an article such as a chair. You want to file a patentapplication to protect the design.
Diplomatic Conference to Conclude and Adopt a Design Law Treaty – Plenary Sessions. Having freelanced as a patent research analyst, he developed an interest in patent prosecution and in exploring the Patents Act through various interpretative approaches. The Articles that were proposed in the Treaty can be accessed here.
In our new paper, The Truth About DesignPatents , we debunk three widely held—but incorrect—views about U.S. designpatents. Taken together, these myths paint a grim picture of designpatents: Half of all designpatentapplications are rejected. Acquiring DesignPatents.
According to Article 27 of the Chinese Patent Law, where a patentapplication for a design is filed, documents such as a request, drawings or photographs of the design and a brief description of the design shall be submitted. By: Linda Liu & Partners
GM decision, the USPTO issued a memorandum to its examiners providing updated guidance and examination instructions in light of the court’s overturning of the long-standing Rosen-Durling test for determining obviousness of designpatents.
Last month, the United States Patent and Trademark Office published Supplemental Guidance for examination of designpatentapplications related to computer-generated electronic images. As noted by the USPTO, the guidance does not provide any new practice or procedure but.
The decision provides important guidance on how the morality exclusion under Article 53(a) EPC should be interpreted in the context of biotechnological inventions involving human-animal chimeras. Kat-pig Final Thoughts In T 1553/22 , the Board of Appeal provided an outline for assessing chimeric stem cell inventions under Article 53(a) EPC.
Yvon Chouinard, Let My People Go Surfing: The Education of a Reluctant Businessman- In a designpatentapplication, “the subject matter which is claimed is the design embodied in or applied to an article of manufacture (or portion thereof) and not the article itself.”. By: Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC
Focus on what matters most So much can be said, and has been said, about the patentapplication process. To avoid information overload, let’s get back to the most basic things you need to know to file a patentapplication. Apply for design or utility patent? How much to patent an idea?
by Dennis Crouch In a highly anticipated en banc decision, the Federal Circuit has overruled the longstanding Rosen-Durling test for assessing obviousness of designpatents. Rejecting the argument that KSR did not implicate designpatent obviousness, the court reasoned that 35 U.S.C. § GM Global Tech. Operations LLC , No.
Are there any requirements for getting a designpatent? Designpatents can be quite powerful. Even though designpatents are easier to get than utility patents, it is still possible for a designapplication to be rejected. What is an original design?
Controller of Patents and Designs , came down heavily on the IPO for its shoddy order rejecting the patentapplication filed by the appellant. The judgment raises serious concerns regarding the quality of functioning of the patent office. The above patentapplication was filed in 2011.
Suppose that you have an invention disclosure for a design of an article that you want to protect. When you review the invention disclosure, you notice that the design is ornamental, for example, a pattern, on an article such as a chair. You want to file a patentapplication to protect the design.
Designpatents and utility patents are two different things. Designpatents protect ornamental designs, such as the shape of a perfume bottle or the design on flatware. To be patentable, however, both designs and functional inventions must satisfy two requirements. Telflex, Inc.,
Just a few days before Holidays season, the Legal Board of Appeal announced its ruling in the cases J 8/20 and J 9/20, thus confirming the decisions of the Receiving Section of the European Patent Office, both of which has refused the DABUS applications EP 18 275 163 and EP 18 275 174. The Board of Appeal also rejected this request.
While this Kat was inquiring about the role of alternative designs in examination of Art. The claimant in the national case, Papierfabriek Doetinchem, is the owner of Community Design No 001344022-0006 for a “packaging device” i.e., a holder for paper rolls (see the image to the right). The case goes as follows. 8(1) Regulation 6/2002.
In response to public comments submitted in response to its request thereof regarding the “article of manufacture” requirement for designpatent eligibility appearing in Title 35, United States Code, Section 171, and as explained in our previous post, the U.S.
But it’s now evident that AI is capable of producing inventions on its own, and there have been multiple documented instances of patentapplications where the person applying for a patent has recognized AI as the inventor. If such products were created by a human inventor, they could be eligible for patent protection.
The Board of Appeal had previously announced its decision to refuse two European patentapplications naming an algorithm ("DABUS") as the sole inventor at the end of last year ( IPKat ). Thus, contrary to the recent Nature article on this topic, AI is not breaking patent law.
This position entails drafting and prosecuting patentapplications and performing invalidity and infringement analysis. We are looking for candidates who have a strong technical background, particularly in microprocessor technology, computer memory architecture, or integrated circuit design.
Legal background: Equivalence around Europe The Unified Patent Court Agreement (UPCA) contains no specific provisions on the doctrine of equivalence. Beyond this high-level guidance from Article 2 of the Protocol, the UPC faces the challenge of developing its own approach to assessing infringement by equivalence.
Among the report’s key findings is that global patent filing activity increased for the fourth straight year, thanks in large part to continued growth in China and a strong showing from India, which placed among the top ten nations for patents, trademarks and industrial designs.
A revolution in structural biology: From protein structure to drug-design AlphaFold is a machine learning model for predicting the 3D structure of proteins. These abilities mean that AlphaFold3 will potentially be a powerful tool for in silico drug design and screening. Instead of trade secrets, DeepMind pursued patents.
The Board upheld a Section 2(e)(5) refusal to register the design of the Eames chair (shown below) for "furniture, namely chairs," finding the configuration to be de jure functional. The well known Eames chair was designed in the 1940s and was recognized by Time magazine as the Best Design of the 20th Century.
A referral on the co/joint applicants approach to priority has long been expected ( IPKat ), and the new referrals will hopefully provide some much legal clarity on this issue. P1 was filed in the name of 3 inventor-applicants, A1, A2 and A3. In effect, the patentee argued that a PCT joint applicants approach should apply.
2022) raises a number of important designpatent law questions, including an issue of first-impression of the scope of “comparison prior art” available for the ordinary observer infringement analysis under Egyptian Goddess, Inc. The case was remanded back to the USPTO 10 months ago, and not patent has issued yet.
Prior Patently-O coverage of this appeal is available here.) My 2015 article, The PatentedDesign , was mentioned several times during the argument. In that article, I argued that a designpatent’s scope should be limited to the design as applied to a specific type of product.
Last week, the Federal Circuit Court reversed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision in In re Surgisil, L.L.P., overturning the Board’s ruling that a design for a rolled-paper art tool for blending anticipated Surgisil’s (Applicant) claimed lip implant. In re Surgisil, L.L.P., 2020-1940, 2021 WL 4515275 (Fed.
Over the last 20 years, the total number of designpatents issued per year in the United States has erupted. As illustrated in the graph below and further highlighted in this animated graph, in the 30 year period between the years 1971 and 2000 a total of nearly 219,000 designpatents were issued by the U.S.
A designpatent protects a new, original, ornamental design for an article of manufacture. “Ornamental” means that the design is purely decorative; the patentability is based on its visual aspects. The design must be a design for a specific article; it cannot exist independently of the article.
A designpatent protects a new, original, ornamental design for an article of manufacture. Ornamental” means that the design is purely decorative; the patentability is based on its visual aspects. The design must be a design for a specific article; it cannot exist independently of the article.
In recent years, AI patent activity has exponentially increased. The figure below shows the volume of public AI patentapplications categorized by AI component in the U.S. 1 are defined in an article published in 2020 by the USPTO. These AI patents may be claimed from either a software perspective or hardware perspective.
The Federal Circuit recently narrowly construed the claim of a designpatentapplication to reverse the holding of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) affirming the rejection of the claim for a lip implant based on a prior art reference for an art tool. 29/491,550 (the ’550 application). 3d 1334 (Fed.
A patent strategy informed by the unique considerations raised by generative AI will optimize protections for innovations in the field. Patent strategies should reflect the current legal landscape as well as anticipate potential future legal developments. Part One of this article series covers claim scope and inventorship.
So much so that the post-1902 Act regional circuit designpatent cases invalidating designpatents on functionality grounds would come out oppositely under the Federal Circuit’s lax standards. BCLT invited practitioners and academics to comment on our analysis. This commentary presents some of our findings.
The biggest increase in patent filings was in Asia, where 67.6% of worldwide patentapplications were filed. Trademark applications grew at a much faster rate than patentapplications, with a 5.5% Industrial design filing activity also rose by 9.2% The United States saw a 1.2%
What is the meaning of broken or dashed lines in a designpatent? While I’m not sure if you can call it a loophole, US designpatents enable a particular option in the drawings that can potentially broaden protection. In a US designpatent, the claimed design comprises what is drawn in solid lines.
While a court may resolve the dispute over inventorship for the patentapplication, court review of current inventorship rules could be a slippery slope to chaos. patentapplication was filed by Moderna, with no NIH scientists listed as inventors. patentapplication.
Ananaya Agrawal: South Africa Approves World’s First Patent With AI Inventor (Source: Jurist). Fred Lambert: Tesla Discloses Cybertruck Design Influences in Fascinating New Patent (Source: Electrek). Commentary and Journal Articles: Atty. Source: SCRIBD.
If you are thinking of patenting software, it is critical to have your utility nonprovisional patentapplication drafted with Section 101 in mind. By anticipating the potential rejections, more can written in your specification and illustrated in your drawings before you file your software patentapplication.
This position entails drafting and prosecuting patentapplications and performing invalidity and infringement analysis. We are looking for candidates who have a strong technical background, particularly in microprocessor technology, computer memory architecture, or integrated circuit design.
This week in Other Barks & Bites: the Federal Circuit issues decisions reversing the PTAB’s nonobviousness ruling on soup dispenser designpatent claims challenged by Campbell Soup and finding that the USPTO cannot recoup expert witness fees from patentapplicants filing Section 145 lawsuits; USPTO General Counsel David Berdan to step in for Coke (..)
Fish Principals Craig Deutsch , Jennifer Huang , and Grace Kim , discuss challenging designpatents at the PTAB in their Law360 Expert Analysis article. Read the full article on Law360. As an initial matter, designpatent trials at the PTAB are relatively rare. PDF copy available.
A recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has fundamentally altered the law on prior art anticipation for designpatentapplications. SurgiSil design – “Limp Implant”. Therefore, since the applied prior art reference discloses a design for an art tool—i.e., 2020-1940 (Oct.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content