This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) today announced that a final rule will be published tomorrow, November 16, in the Federal Register implementing a designpatent practitioner bar. A request for comments (RFC) was also published in October 22.
Last month, the United States Patent and Trademark Office published Supplemental Guidance for examination of designpatent applications related to computer-generated electronic images.
DesignPatent #D1,050,634 from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Design Application #29888619, titled “Rope Throw Dog Toy” on September 18, 2024, and the patent was issued on November 5, 2024. And on Friday, November 15, I received my official patent in the mail.
Are there any requirements for getting a designpatent? Designpatents can be quite powerful. Even though designpatents are easier to get than utility patents, it is still possible for a design application to be rejected. 35 USC 171 sets forth the requirements for getting a designpatent.
Suppose you have a design for an ornamental appearance of an article and start producing the article. Subsequently, you receive notice from an owner of a designpatent that you are infringing their patent. You conduct a prior art search and find some references related to the design.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) today published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to the Federal Register that proposes a separate designpatent practitioner bar. Designpatent practitioners would only be able to participate in designpatent proceedings.
For several years, the most controversial part of the designpatent world was patenting of portions of a display screen. The chart above shows the year-over-year numbers of designpatents issued claiming some form of an animated or transitional display. & TRADEMARK OFF. Seymour & Andrew W.
Prior Patently-O coverage of this appeal is available here.) My 2015 article, The PatentedDesign , was mentioned several times during the argument. In that article, I argued that a designpatent’s scope should be limited to the design as applied to a specific type of product. 33 Berkeley Tech.
This article supplements our previous post with updated 2021 data. designpatents continue to grow in popularity. designpatents that issued in 2021 was still greater than the number of U.S. designpatents that issued in each year between 2012-2018, and was more than 50% greater than the number of U.S.
Rejected Trademark Application? Get a DesignPatent Instead The path to registering a trademark can be strewn with landmines. When your trademark application faces difficult rejections, would a designpatent make more sense? Having difficulty trademarking your brand?
What is the meaning of broken or dashed lines in a designpatent? While I’m not sure if you can call it a loophole, US designpatents enable a particular option in the drawings that can potentially broaden protection. In a US designpatent, the claimed design comprises what is drawn in solid lines.
A designpatent protects a new, original, ornamental design for an article of manufacture. “Ornamental” means that the design is purely decorative; the patentability is based on its visual aspects. The design must be a design for a specific article; it cannot exist independently of the article.
A designpatent protects a new, original, ornamental design for an article of manufacture. Ornamental” means that the design is purely decorative; the patentability is based on its visual aspects. The design must be a design for a specific article; it cannot exist independently of the article.
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has published a notice with supplemental guidance for its staff members examining designpatent claims that include computer-generated images.
Fashion brands, for example, are filing trademark applications in the US, Japan and the EU to secure protection for the use of their brands on digital projections of their apparel, shoes and accessories that are transacted in the Metaverse. Are they protectable by designpatents? Article 2.4 Section 4.4.2
Fish Principals Craig Deutsch , Jennifer Huang , and Grace Kim , discuss challenging designpatents at the PTAB in their Law360 Expert Analysis article. Read the full article on Law360. As an initial matter, designpatent trials at the PTAB are relatively rare. PDF copy available.
Applications for designpatents have surged in recent years, with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) reporting a 20% increase in applications over the last five years.
by Dennis Crouch Seirus has petitioned for writ of certiorari in its long-running designpatent dispute with Columbia Sportswear. Questions presented: When looking for comparison prior art, is the article’s function relevant in any way? Must the comparison prior art be the “same article” as claimed?
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) recently reached an important milestone. On September 26, 2023, the USPTO issued its millionth designpatent. United States Patent D1,000,000 covers the ornamental design for a dispensing comb, as shown below. § 171).
This week in Other Barks & Bites: the Federal Circuit issues decisions reversing the PTAB’s nonobviousness ruling on soup dispenser designpatent claims challenged by Campbell Soup and finding that the USPTO cannot recoup expert witness fees from patent applicants filing Section 145 lawsuits; USPTO General Counsel David Berdan to step in for Coke (..)
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued its one millionth designpatent on September 26, 2023. D1,000,000 claims the ornamental design for a dispensing comb. This milestone comes during a particularly prolific period for designpatents.
Kilpatrick Townsend’s Babak Kusha recently spoke at the Federal Bar Association’s IP Law Fall Conference 2022 on the topic of “DesignPatents for Patent Professionals.” Please see full article below for more information. By: Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
Section 171 of title 35 United States Code provides “whoever invents any new, original and ornamental design for an article of manufacture may obtain a patent thereof”. The office primarily considers the designs for computer-generated icons embodied in articles of manufacture as statutorily eligible for attaining a patent.
In response to public comments submitted in response to its request thereof regarding the “article of manufacture” requirement for designpatent eligibility appearing in Title 35, United States Code, Section 171, and as explained in our previous post, the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO's) new director wasted no time getting down to business in terms of protecting design innovation in the United States. This report summarized public comments received in response to a December 2020 request by the USPTO. manufacturers.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) clarified the law on comparison prior art in designpatent cases. DesignPatent No. D657,093 (“the D’093 Patent”) via sales of its products containing HeatWave™ liner material, as illustrated side-by-side below.
Suppose that you have an invention disclosure for a design of an article that you want to protect. When you review the invention disclosure, you notice that the design is ornamental, for example, a pattern, on an article such as a chair. You want to file a patent application to protect the design.
Should you use a designpatent to protect your new product? When compared to utility patents , designpatents are often overlooked as an IP asset. Let’s explore when it makes sense to pursue a product designpatent. Let’s explore when it makes sense to pursue a product designpatent.
In 2007, I began attending sessions of the World Intellectual Property Organizations (WIPOs) Standing Committee on Trademarks, Industrial Designs, and Geographical Indications (SCT) in Geneva, Switzerland, to discuss the development of the Design Law Treaty.
Fashion brands, for example, are filing trademark applications in the US, Japan and the EU to secure protection for the use of their brands on digital projections of their apparel, shoes and accessories that are transacted in the Metaverse. Are they protectable by designpatents? Article 2.4 Section 4.4.2
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) is amending the rules of practice in patent cases by creating a separate space for individuals with educational backgrounds in design-related disciplines to qualify to practice before the USPTO in the limited capacity of designpatent application proceedings.
Let’s look at how you should protect and trademark your clothing lines. Contact US patent and trademark attorney Vic Lin at 949-223-9623 or email vlin@icaplaw.com to explore how we can register your clothing brand’s trademarks, patents and copyrights. But how do you show a trademark on clothing?
A recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has fundamentally altered the law on prior art anticipation for designpatent applications. 171(a), designpatent protection is permitted to “[w]hoever invents any new, original and ornamental design for an article of manufacture.” (Emphasis added).
Over the last 20 years, the total number of designpatents issued per year in the United States has erupted. As illustrated in the graph below and further highlighted in this animated graph, in the 30 year period between the years 1971 and 2000 a total of nearly 219,000 designpatents were issued by the U.S.
The parties faced off in a rematch at the Federal Circuit following an earlier bout involving the same designpatent, U.S. which each address the issue of determining the article of manufacture, but for different stages of the patent process. Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc. and Curver Luxembourg, SARL, v.
According to the recently-published 2021 US DesignPatent Toteboard , Quarles & Brady was once again a top ten firm nationally for the most United States designpatents obtained for its clients in the year 2021. This is the fourth consecutive year that the firm has appeared on this list.
I am excited to announce the publication of the American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) ’s article on “ IP Aspects of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality Technologies.” The article can be found here and was published as part of the AIPLA’s INNOVATE Magazine.
Designpatents protect the ornamental appearance of an article. The protection granted by a designpatent is primarily indicated by illustrations. Since the first grant in 1842, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has issued about 1.03 million designpatents.
This article was written as a requirement for Prof. In late November 2021, Lululemon launched a lawsuit for designpatent infringement against Peloton in relation to perceived similarities in the design elements of various pieces of activewear, including sports bras and leggings.
Designpatents play a role when we have them, typically a handbag/jewelry/diamond cuts/chain designs/shoes. Issue: legal is often the last to know of new designs, so you need to know before the design is launched: need to explain that legal needs to be part of the process. Apple v Samsung changed perceptions.
[These are my rough-draft talk notes from a recent workshop of trademark law professors.] The SAD Scheme involves a trademark owner suing dozens/hundreds of defendants using a sealed complaint, getting an ex parte TRO, and then having the online marketplaces freeze the defendants’ accounts and money.
In a surprising move, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) has granted a petition for rehearing en banc on the issue of whether the test for determining obviousness of designpatents has been overruled by the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in KSR v. Teleflex , 550 U.S. 398 (2007). 2d at 391 ).
Earlier this month, ten of the world’s largest companies were accused of infringing designpatents claiming animated graphical user interfaces (GUIs). These assertions were made in addition to at least ten other lawsuits filed since September 2021 asserting animated GUI designpatents. 1–4, illustrated below.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content