Remove Article Remove Copyright Law Remove Derivative Work Remove Litigation
article thumbnail

When is a derivative work original and thus protectable by copyright? Classicist’s critical edition makes its way to Luxembourg in fresh Romanian CJEU referral

The IPKat

The book that is going to change copyright law? After the referrals in Mio [IPKat here and here ] and USM Haller [IPKat here ] , another referral asking about the meaning of originality in EU copyright law has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU): it is the referral from Romania in Institutul G.

article thumbnail

Deadly Dolls and a Forgotten Copyright Exception

Copyright Lately

I’m talking about section 113(c) , which allows photographs of useful articles incorporating copyrighted works to be made and used without violating copyright law. This is how her picture might look on some useful articles: Who doesn’t love a hula-hooping cat? 17 U.S.C. § 17 U.S.C. § You get the idea.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Some Thoughts on Five Pending AI Litigations – Avoiding Squirrels and Other AI Distractions

Velocity of Content

This article was originally published in The Scholarly Kitchen. As a person involved in copyright on a daily basis, I’ve observed a number of events and requests for comment over the last few years on the issue of whether artificial intelligence (AI) systems can be “authors” in the copyright sense (or inventors of patents).

article thumbnail

The Briefing by the IP Law Blog: The Yonays Take the First Sortie in Copyright Fight With Paramount Over Top Gun Maverick

The IP Law Blog

The heirs of the author who wrote an article upon which “Top Gun” is based, claims the film’s sequel is an infringing derivative work. Scott Hervey and Josh Escovedo discuss this on The Briefing by the IP Law Blog. Paramount has since filed a motion to dismiss the case. Listen to this podcast episode here.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Holds Warhol’s “Orange Prince” Not Transformative, Not Fair Use

IP Tech Blog

What is or is not “transformative,” however, is largely framed by the original author’s statutory right to control derivative works, i.e., a new work of authorship that is created by modifying, transforming or adapting the original in some way.

article thumbnail

Keep Calm and Fandom On: Copyright in Cosplay, Fanfiction, and Fanart

IPilogue

Luckily for most cosplayers, their costumes likely do not infringe copyright laws. In both the United States and Canada , costumes do not fall under copyright protection given their classification as “useful articles.” Unfortunately, laws around fanfiction and fanart are not clear.

Copyright 122
article thumbnail

Prince Pop Art Not a Fair Use: SCOTUS Rules Against Warhol

LexBlog IP

Warhol created the print that was used in the 1984 Prince article in Vanity Fair , for which Goldsmith received her modest sum and artistic credit. The Use Upon Prince’s death in 2016, Condé Nast (the parent company of Vanity Fair ) ran a commemorative feature on Prince and used another Warhol-based-on-Goldsmith work.