article thumbnail

IP.com Launches InnovationQ – The Next Generation of Prior Art Search Technology

IP.com

Press Release: 11/24/2024 IP.com is thrilled to announce the launch of InnovationQ, the next-generation interface for its industry-leading Prior Art Database. Why InnovationQ Matters to Innovators InnovationQ’s state-of-the-art capabilities make it the go-to solution for organizations striving to maintain a competitive edge.

Art 92
article thumbnail

The morality (and patentability) of inventions derived by immoral means (T 2510/18)

The IPKat

Cases relating to the exclusion of patentable subject matter on moral grounds are rare, and always serve to highlight the underlying moral and political framework necessary for a well-functioning IP system. Case Background The patent ( EP2443126 ) related to the plant extract Simalikalactone E and its use to treat malaria.

Invention 113
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Patent, Trademark, and Copyright: Definitions and Distinctions

Erik K Pelton

The following is an edited transcript of my video Patent, Trademark, and Copyright Definitions and Differences. The following is an edited transcript of my video Patent, Trademark, and Copyright Definitions and Differences. A patent registration generally lasts for 20 years from the time the application was filed.

Trademark 130
article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Redefines Prior Art Requirements Under § 102(e)/102(a)(2): In re Riggs

Patently-O

by Dennis Crouch In a significant decision, the Federal Circuit has established a more rigorous test for determining when a published patent application claiming priority to a provisional application can be considered prior art as of its provisional filing date. Continue reading this post on Patently-O. In re Riggs , Case No.

Art 70
article thumbnail

Embio Ltd. v. Malladi Drugs: Madras High Court Clarifies the Extent of Burden of Proof in Matters concerning Patent Revocation

SpicyIP

Malladi Drugs, SpicyIP Intern Bhuwan Sarine analyses the Court’s finding on the burden of proof in patent matters concerning revocation petitions. 64 of the Patents Act, 1970 (“the Act”). Accordingly, the Court decided in favour of Malladi Drugs (“Respondent”), upholding the validity of its patent. Petitioner”) under s.

Invention 105
article thumbnail

Motivation to Modify Prior Art Need Not Be the Same as Challenged Patent

JD Supra Law

The Federal Circuit reversed, finding that the PTAB erred by (1) requiring identity between the motivations for the prior art and the 718 patent, (2) failing to support its findings with substantial evidence, (3) conflating. Honeywell filed a petition for inter partes review of 3G Licensings U.S. Honeywell appealed.

Art 62
article thumbnail

Logical Fallacy in Patent Law: Analysing Abolkheir’s Challenge to the Soundness of Non-obviousness Test

SpicyIP

Dr. Abolkheir labels the inherent fallacy within patent law as “ inventio ad hominem ” fallacy. Questioning the logical foundations of patent laws, he argues that defining ‘inventive step’ in terms of ‘non-obviousness’ shifts the focus of inquiry to the inventor, rather than the invention itself. Cipla Ltd. ,