Art Ownership Patent Application Patent Law 
Patently-O
MAY 15, 2024
” The dissenters saw a fundamental distinction between a patentee’s exclusive rights in the patented invention itself versus contractual rights in unpatented articles used with the invention. He asserted that such restrictions were a legitimate exercise of property rights, an “an ordinary incident of ownership.”
The IPKat
AUGUST 11, 2023
In the pending European DABUS case ( EP4067251 ), DABUS's invention as originally claimed was found to lack novelty in view of 25 year old prior art. The process of patent prosecution determines whether the application contains an invention that may be awarded a patent. Perhaps herein lies the problem.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The IP Law Blog
NOVEMBER 9, 2023
Well, it turns out that not all contributions count when it comes to being an inventor of a patent for a better method of precooking bacon. In 2021, HIP sued Hormel, challenging Hormel’s ownership and the inventorship of U.S. 9,980,498 (the “’498 Patent”). The ‘498 Patent was issued from this application in 2018.
SpicyIP
AUGUST 9, 2021
In this post, I will be analysing the recommendations pertaining to the amendment of patent laws in order to facilitate inventorship and ownership by AI. I will be restricting the discussion to the evaluation of the Indian patent regime, as the implications of AI on Indian copyright law has been previously dealt with here.
The IPKat
JULY 16, 2024
This tome was first published in 1884 by Thomas Terrell, and in the 140 years since, has become a well-established authority for patent practitioners and judges, providing thorough commentary on both the substance and practice of UK patent law. Chapter 7 examines the determination of the priority date of an invention.
IPilogue
NOVEMBER 1, 2021
In July 2021, the Federal Court of Australia affirmed in Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879 that artificial intelligence (AI) systems may be deemed “inventors” under Australian patent law. The principal question at hand is whether non-human entities, such as AI systems, should have legal capacity.
LexBlog IP
DECEMBER 26, 2023
You’ll almost certainly see language that says you cannot apply for copyright or trademark registration for those logos , and that Canva and whoever they licensed the clip art, photos, etc. used in those generated logos retain the ownership to that original art and do not give you a license to use it exclusively.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
109 
Let's personalize your content