Patently-O

APRIL 30, 2024

by Dennis Crouch This article explores the impact of Generative AI on prior art and potential revisions to patent examination standards to address the rising tidal wave of AI-generated, often speculative, disclosures that could undermine the patent system’s integrity. Still, seemingly qualify as prior art under 35 U.S.C.

Art 111

Art Invention Patent Application Publishing 111

Larson & Larson

NOVEMBER 12, 2024

Track One Patent Applications: Accelerating Your Path to Patent Protection After nearly 15 years of shepherding inventors through the patent process, I’ve seen firsthand how crucial timing can be in protecting intellectual property. Track One might be the competitive edge you need.

Patent Application 40

Patent Application Patent Marketing Marketing 40

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

MARCH 6, 2024

What is a prior-art search? Prior art, the term mostly used during patent applications, is used to describe all information available in the public domain before the priority or filling date of the patent application. This information is related to the patent applications. and Klebsiella sp.,

Art 52

Art Patent Public Domain Invention 52

Patent Trademark Blog

FEBRUARY 6, 2023

Focus on what matters most So much can be said, and has been said, about the patent application process. To avoid information overload, let’s get back to the most basic things you need to know to file a patent application. Apply for design or utility patent? How much to patent an idea?

Patent Application 98

Patent Application Patent Designs Design 98

The IP Law Blog

AUGUST 11, 2022

Previously, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) has found that a non-human may infringe patents. But can an AI system be a named inventor on a patent? That may have been done by the AI system, which raises the question as to who is the inventor of the invention created by that system.

Inventor 96

Inventor Invention Patent Patent Application 96

Intellectual Property Law Blog

FEBRUARY 21, 2024

Inventors and patent practitioners filing patent applications before U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) may have an obligation to disclose if artificial intelligence (AI) is used in the innovation process. the Office is aware of and evaluates the teachings of all information material to patentability.”

Invention 130

Invention Inventor Patent Application Patent 130

The IPKat

AUGUST 11, 2023

In keeping with the so-called media "silly season" of late summer, PatKat thought she would check-in on the AI inventor debate. In the pending European DABUS case ( EP4067251 ), DABUS's invention as originally claimed was found to lack novelty in view of 25 year old prior art. Sceptical Kat Has DABUS invented?

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Law Ownership 52

The IP Law Blog

MARCH 10, 2022

The United States Copyright Office has refused to register a copyright for a work of art created by a machine. The work of art is a two-dimensional picture that is mostly dark and sort of looks like a painting. In 2019, the Copyright Office refused the application on the grounds that it lacked “human authorship.”

Art 97

Art Copyright Copyright Law Registration 97

Patently-O

AUGUST 5, 2024

The basic holding is that the 102(a)(2)/(b)(2) safe harbor triggered by an inventor’s pre-filing “public disclosure” of the invention requires that the invention be made “reasonably available to the public.” In fact, although Kuo was on file, it was not yet published as of Liao’s application filing date.

Invention 111

Invention Inventor Art Public Use 111

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 14, 2024

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) may change how we invent: many envision a collaborative approach between human inventors and AI systems that develop novel solutions to problems together. Such AI-assisted inventions present a new set of legal issues under patent law. On February 13, 2024, the U.S. 101 and 115. .”

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Patent Designs 52

Patently-O

NOVEMBER 28, 2023

by Dennis Crouch The Patent Trial and Appeal Board recently designated as precedential a portion of its Penumbra v. RapidPulse decision in that provides important guidance on the use of a provisional patent application’s filing date for 102(a)(2) prior art under the America Invents Act. Penumbra, Inc.

Art 49

Art Inventor Publishing Invention 49

LexBlog IP

NOVEMBER 9, 2023

Well, it turns out that not all contributions count when it comes to being an inventor of a patent for a better method of precooking bacon. 9,980,498 (the “’498 Patent”). The ‘498 Patent is directed to a two-step process for cooking bacon pieces. Also, Howard was not named as an inventor.

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Art Patent 52

IPilogue

NOVEMBER 1, 2021

In July 2021, the Federal Court of Australia affirmed in Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879 that artificial intelligence (AI) systems may be deemed “inventors” under Australian patent law. Third, nothing in the Act dictates the contrary conclusion.”. Firstly, Kim et al. Firstly, Kim et al. However, Kim et al.

Inventor 111

Inventor Patent Invention Intellectual Property 111

TraskBritt Intellectual Property

MAY 27, 2021

The cost savings of filing a provisional patent application without consulting a professional are certainly tempting. However, such a strategy may ultimately cost more in the long run, including possibly costing valuable patent protection. What is a Provisional Patent Application? Keep Trade Secrets Secret.

Patent Application 52

Patent Application Patent Invention Inventor 52

Velocity of Content

MARCH 16, 2022

This is why an unadorned set of directions, such as stripped-down basic instructions in a baking recipe, does not qualify, but “Mastering the Art of French Cooking” by Julia Child (a book that contains much more expressive text, which served to make it a bestseller) does. The post Can an AI be Properly Considered an Inventor?

Inventor 98

Inventor Editing Copyright Copyright Law 98

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 25, 2022

Free Online Tools and Resources for Inventors. As an inventor, you know that protecting your invention is vital to its success. The process of patenting can be daunting, but with the right tools and resources, it doesn’t have to be. PATENT SEARCH TOOLS. Google Patents. Link: patents.google.com. Patentscope.

Inventor 52

Inventor Intellectual Property Invention Patent Application 52

Larson & Larson

FEBRUARY 13, 2021

A high number of patent applications are given a non-final rejection from the USPTO according to Yale. Often, the reason that the patent office will cite for rejecting an application is the presence of prior art. This makes the term ‘prior art’ an important concept for inventors to understand.

Art 52

Art Patent Invention Patent Application 52

SpicyIP

NOVEMBER 9, 2024

In his recent work published in the Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice , Dr. Mo Abolkheir argues that the prevailing interpretation of ‘inventive steps’ places emphasis on the inventor’s imaginative capacity rather than the invention itself. Now, who is this ‘skilled worker’ or ‘person skilled in the art?’

Patent Law 93

Patent Law Law Invention Patent 93

LexBlog IP

JUNE 23, 2022

The Patent Reexamination and Invalidation Department (PRID) of the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) invalidated the CN Invention Patent No. The novelty art is an article published within the grace period (i.e., 201310567987.0 (the

Art 52

Art Patent Prosecution Patent Application Intellectual Property 52

LexBlog IP

DECEMBER 21, 2023

Stephen Thaler, nelle quali veniva designato come unico inventore il sistema di intelligenza artificiale “DABUS”, di proprietà dello stesso Dott. Thaler non avesse rispettato l’Art. Thaler non avesse rispettato l’Art. Stephen Thaler. §§ 54-73). §§ 54-73).

Inventor 52

Inventor Patent Application Patent Intellectual Property 52

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 11, 2022

Previously, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) has found that a non-human may infringe patents. But can an AI system be a named inventor on a patent? That may have been done by the AI system, which raises the question as to who is the inventor of the invention created by that system.

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Patent Application Patent 52

Kashishipr

JULY 28, 2021

However, it does not include within itself those equivalents that belong to the state of the art to arbitrarily extend the scope of the patent. ” The said doctrine is limited in scope through the application of different tests that are later discussed in this article. Concluding Remarks.

Patent Application 59

Patent Application Patent Invention Art 59

LexBlog IP

MAY 9, 2023

to have David Howard added as an inventor to Hormel’s U.S. 9,980,498 (Bacon Patent) were recently scorched by the Federal Circuit. More than a decade later in 2018, the Bacon Patent was issued naming four inventors that assigned rights to Hormel. was the assignee of the Honjo Patents. Efforts by HIP, Inc.

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Patent Application Patent 52

Patent Trademark Blog

APRIL 19, 2023

But, what makes a patent application obvious? If you get an obviousness rejection under Section 103, how do you show that you are trying to patent a nonobvious invention? Want to file a nonobvious patent? Nevertheless, this is the reality that every utility patent applicant must face.

Patent 98

Patent Patent Application Invention Art 98

Intellectual Property Law Blog

MAY 22, 2023

Enablement Section 112(a) of the Patent Act requires that a patent specification includes “a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making an using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art…to make and use the same. In re Wands , 858 F.2d

Invention 246

Invention Art Inventor Patent 246

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 11, 2022

5, 2022), that an artificial intelligence (AI) system cannot be listed as a named inventor on a patent application, affirming earlier rulings from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the lower court in the Eastern District of Virginia.

Inventor 40

Inventor Patent Application Patent Invention 40

Patent Trademark Blog

SEPTEMBER 18, 2024

That meant that if someone filed a patent application before you, there were ways to obtain your patent even though your filing date was later. Need to get a patent earlier than others? Contact US patent attorney Vic Lin at vlin@icaplaw.com to explore how we can expedite your US patent application.

Patent Application 52

Patent Application Design Patent Patent Designs 52

JD Supra Law

OCTOBER 12, 2021

Those four tips are applicable to any subject matter, including chemical, mechanical, and software inventions.

Inventor 52

Inventor Business Patent Application Invention 52

Patent Trademark Blog

JULY 30, 2021

What kinds of comments are useful in revising a draft patent application? So your patent attorney has send you a first draft of your utility patent application for your review. You’re not sure what to do, so you read my helpful tips on how to review a draft patent application.

Patent Application 53

Patent Application Editing Patent Design Patent 53

LexBlog IP

MARCH 10, 2022

The United States Copyright Office has refused to register a copyright for a work of art created by a machine. The work of art is a two-dimensional picture that is mostly dark and sort of looks like a painting. In 2019, the Copyright Office refused the application on the grounds that it lacked “human authorship.”

Art 52

Art Copyright Copyright Law Registration 52

Patently-O

FEBRUARY 12, 2024

The key takeaway here is that the USPTO believes that an AI-developed invention is patentable so long as a human satisfies the joint-inventorship standard of “significantly contributing to the invention.” patents and patent applications. According to the USPTO, each claim needs to have a human inventor.

Inventor 120

Inventor Invention Patent Application Design 120

Intellectual Property Law Blog

JUNE 7, 2023

Part Two of this article series covers subject matter eligibility, prior art, and future opportunities. PART ONE Patent Claims and Inventorship The Federal Circuit in Thaler v. 2022) recently confirmed that an inventor under the patent statute must be a natural person. Vidal , No. 2021-2347 (Fed.

Patent 130

Patent Intellectual Property Patent Application Inventor 130

The IPKat

DECEMBER 31, 2021

The EPO has launched a user consultation on grace periods for patents, the results of which will be published in early 2022 ( EPO press release ). The EPC as it currently stands does not permit a grace period in which inventors may disclose their invention without prejudicing a future patent filing. 102(b)(1)(A) ).

Patent 130

Patent Inventor Patent Application Art 130

Patently-O

SEPTEMBER 2, 2022

2022) raises a number of important design patent law questions, including an issue of first-impression of the scope of “comparison prior art” available for the ordinary observer infringement analysis under Egyptian Goddess, Inc. The case was remanded back to the USPTO 10 months ago, and not patent has issued yet.

Design Patent 81

Design Patent Art Designs Design 81

Intellectual Property Law Blog

JULY 25, 2023

This case addresses requirements to correct inventorship of a patent. Background Blue Gentian is an assignee of Berardi’s six patents involving a collapsible hose, where Berardi is the named inventor. Three months before filing the applications for the six patents, Ragner held a meeting to seek investors, which included Berardi.

Inventor 130

Inventor Design Designs Invention 130

IP and Legal Filings

DECEMBER 28, 2021

With growing inventions, inventors are gaining prominence and expertise in their field. For such inventions, it is necessary that the inventors gain a full monopoly and they should be able to get utmost profit out of his invention. For this, it is important to understand the relevance of patents. Patent Agents.

Patent 91

Patent Inventor Invention Patent Application 91

Intepat

FEBRUARY 13, 2021

One of the most common reasons an invention is rejected from being protected is the existence of prior art, or that the said invention is not novel and has already been, in fact, for some time now. This, in turn, will help you create a stronger patent claim and reduce the number of amendments you might have to make at later stages.

Art 52

Art Invention Due Diligence Patent Application 52