Remove Art Remove Invention Remove Public Domain
article thumbnail

Embio Ltd. v. Malladi Drugs: Madras High Court Clarifies the Extent of Burden of Proof in Matters concerning Patent Revocation

SpicyIP

While the Court’s analysis touched upon multiple aspects of patentability and revocation, including ‘novelty,’ ‘inventive step,’ ‘non-obviousness’ and ‘person interested,’ the most significant point was related to the burden of proof in matters concerning patent revocation petitions. Thus, all three elements of ‘inventive step’ under s.

Invention 105
article thumbnail

Understanding IPO’s Rejection of UPL’s Patent Application for Mancozeb and Ortho Silicic Acid Combination in Light of the Patent Bargain and Sufficiency of Disclosure

SpicyIP

The essence of the patent regime lies in, the ‘patent bargain’ – inventors are granted a monopoly over their invention for a fixed term of 20 years in exchange for a complete disclosure. Under Section 10(4), an applicant is supposed to disclose the best method of performing the invention in the complete specification.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

[Guest Post] CJEU weighs in on supplementary protection certificates in Merck v Teva/Clonmel decision

The IPKat

Here's what Claudio and Federico have to say: Two Kats, hungry to hear the outcome of the two CJEU referrals, via the Public Domain Image Archive "In a long-awaited decision issued on 19 December 2024, the Court of Justice of the European Union ("CJEU") ruled on two joint cases ( C-119/22 and C-149/22 ).

article thumbnail

New SPC referral to the CJEU on the interpretation of Art 3(a) and (c) for combination products (Merck v Clonmel)

The IPKat

Furthermore, the primary inventive contribution of the patent was the disclosure of ezetimibe, and not its combined use with simvastatin. However, neither is it necessary that the product in some way corresponds to the "core inventive concept" of the patent.

Art 119
article thumbnail

Patentability in India

IP and Legal Filings

An invention relating either to a product or process that is new, involving an inventive step, and capable of industrial application can be patented.Provided the invention is not falling under the categories of inventions that are non-patentable under sections 3 and 4 of the Patent Act. Image Source: gettyimage].

article thumbnail

Patent Prior Art Search

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

What is a prior-art search? Prior art, the term mostly used during patent applications, is used to describe all information available in the public domain before the priority or filling date of the patent application. Prior art search determines the merits of patent applications. and Klebsiella sp.,

Art 52
article thumbnail

Prior Art

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

Novelty means that the invention must be new or novel and must not have been anticipated by any published document in the world. In order to prove novelty, it must be proved that no other document in the world has any prior claim relating to the subject matter of the invention. a) Prior Publication [Section 29(1), the Act].

Art 52