Intellectual Property Law Blog

MAY 22, 2023

After a nine-year saga, beginning when Amgen sued Sanofi for allegedly infringing two of its patents in 2014, the Supreme Court held that Amgen’s asserted patents failed to satisfy the enablement requirement under 35 U.S.C. § 112(a), and are thus invalid. In re Wands , 858 F.2d 2d at 737, 8 USPQ2d at 1404 (Fed.

Invention 246

Invention Art Inventor Patent 246

JD Supra Law

NOVEMBER 29, 2022

Innovators seeking patent protection for entertainment software inventions should be aware that all software inventions face patent-eligibility issues. Nevertheless, patent practitioners who are experienced in the art of software patent prosecution can help ensure that software inventions get maximum protection.

Invention 96

Invention Patent Prosecution Patent Art 96

Intellectual Property Law Blog

FEBRUARY 21, 2024

Inventors and patent practitioners filing patent applications before U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) may have an obligation to disclose if artificial intelligence (AI) is used in the innovation process. This information is helpful to the USPTO, which believes that “the most effective patent examination occurs when.

Invention 130

Invention Inventor Patent Application Patent 130

SpicyIP

JULY 4, 2024

Vandana Parvez vs The Controller of Patents , dealt with a withdrawn patent application that had been wrongfully published and then later cited as prior art for the same applicant’s subsequent patent application! Despite the withdrawal of the appellant’s patent application, it was wrongfully published.

Art 105

Art Publishing Patent Application Invention 105

Patently-O

AUGUST 17, 2021

Ironburg Inventions ( Fed. Ironburg won a $4 million judgment regarding two patents (now on appeal) and the district court stayed the litigation regarding U.S. Ironburg won a $4 million judgment regarding two patents (now on appeal) and the district court stayed the litigation regarding U.S. Patent Nos. ” Fed.

Art 124

Art Litigation Inventor Publishing 124

Patently-O

AUGUST 5, 2024

Kaijet highlights the narrowness of the pre-filing grace period (safe harbor) provision under the America Invents Act (AIA) and serves as a reminder that there are a number of patents that would have been valid under the pre-AIA patent system may no longer be valid under the current law. Sanho Corp. 2023-1336 (Fed. 35 U.S.C. §

Invention 111

Invention Inventor Art Public Use 111

Intellectual Property Law Blog

FEBRUARY 13, 2024

February 9, 2024) addressed two issues: (1) when the written description requirement is met in the context of a claimed range that is narrower than the ranges disclosed in the patent specification, and (2) the kind of prior art disclosure language which supports a finding of a motivation to combine for an obviousness rejection.

Art 130

Art Invention Copying Designs 130

The IPKat

DECEMBER 13, 2023

The recent Board of Appeal decision in T 1356/21 covered a number of interesting legal points in the field of pharmaceutical patents. The case related to the novelty and inventive step of a second medical use claim. However, it is possible to patent a "substance or composition for use " in a method of treatment.

Invention 119

Invention Patent Law Art 119

Barry Sookman

DECEMBER 23, 2023

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems and in particular generative AI (GenAI) systems have raised the question as to whether technical advances in the useful arts or synthetic content generated using these tools can qualify for patent or copyright protection. The Thaler and SURYAST decisions appeared first on Barry Sookman.

Invention 115

Invention Copyright Patent Inventor 115

Intellectual Property Law Blog

SEPTEMBER 8, 2021

Artificial intelligence is changing industry and society, and metrics at the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) reflect its impact. In a recent publication, the USPTO indicated that from 2002 to 2018 the share of all patent applications relating to artificial intelligence grew from 9% to approximately 16%. See Alice Corp.

Patent 189

Patent Patent Application Invention Art 189

Intellectual Property Law Blog

SEPTEMBER 1, 2021

Artificial intelligence is changing industry and society, and metrics at the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) reflect its impact. In a recent publication, the USPTO indicated that from 2002 to 2018 the share of all patent applications relating to artificial intelligence grew from 9% to approximately 16%. See Alice Corp.

Patent 212

Patent Patent Application Technology Invention 212

Patently-O

APRIL 30, 2024

by Dennis Crouch This article explores the impact of Generative AI on prior art and potential revisions to patent examination standards to address the rising tidal wave of AI-generated, often speculative, disclosures that could undermine the patent system’s integrity. Still, seemingly qualify as prior art under 35 U.S.C.

Art 111

Art Invention Patent Application Publishing 111

The IPKat

OCTOBER 31, 2023

The recent decision in T 0258/21 , by contrast, is the first interpretation of G 2/21 leading to a finding of a lack of inventive step in view of an inadequate disclosure of the purported technical effect. T 0258/21 : Case background T 0258/21 related to the EP patent application EP 12716828.4.

Invention 120

Invention Art Publishing Patent Application 120

SpicyIP

NOVEMBER 9, 2024

In his recent work published in the Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice , Dr. Mo Abolkheir argues that the prevailing interpretation of ‘inventive steps’ places emphasis on the inventor’s imaginative capacity rather than the invention itself. It confuses ‘invention’ with ‘person.’

Patent Law 105

Patent Law Law Invention Patent 105

The IPKat

MARCH 24, 2023

In order to understand whether a purported technical effect may be relied on for inventive step, the EBA concludes that the substantive question remains what would the skilled person understand from the application as filed? For the EBA, the substantive question at the heart of G 2/21 is a familiar one that needs no reference to plausibility.

Invention 131

Invention Publishing Patent Art 131

Patently-O

FEBRUARY 17, 2022

Thad Gabara is a former Bell Labs engineer and is a prolific inventor with 100+ patents in his name. Along the way, Gabara also became a patent agent and personally prosecuted many of his recent patents, including the Sliding Window patents asserted here. Patent Nos. Gabara sued Facebook for patent infringement.

Patent 136

Patent Invention Art Inventor 136

Intellectual Property Law Blog

NOVEMBER 8, 2023

Background Corephotonics owns the ’479 patent, which is directed to creating “portrait photos.” Apple filed two IPR petitions, each challenging various claims of the ’479 patent as obvious in view of multiple prior art references. In Apple Inc. Corephotonics, LTD. , Corephotonics, LTD. ,

Invention 264

Invention Art Patent 264

Intellectual Property Law Blog

JUNE 5, 2023

In particular, this case establishes: (1) which party bears the burden of proof regarding whether a “skilled and diligent searcher” could have reasonably been expected to discover prior art such that failure to include it in an IPR petition estops the petitioner from raising it in other civil actions under 35 U.S.C. §

Invention 130

Invention Art Litigation Patent 130

SpicyIP

AUGUST 27, 2024

Balaji of the Madras High Court (MHC) delivered two decisions that overturned the Controller’s rejection of patent applications, siding with the appellants in both cases. Bitter Pill to Swallow: Controller’s Decision Overturned for Kyrorin’s Patent Application The first one is Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co v. 5360/CHENP/2010).

Patent 105

Patent Art Invention Patent Application 105

SpicyIP

OCTOBER 29, 2024

Malladi Drugs, SpicyIP Intern Bhuwan Sarine analyses the Court’s finding on the burden of proof in patent matters concerning revocation petitions. 64 of the Patents Act, 1970 (“the Act”). Accordingly, the Court decided in favour of Malladi Drugs (“Respondent”), upholding the validity of its patent. Petitioner”) under s.

Invention 105

Invention Art Patent Intellectual Property Law 105

The IPKat

AUGUST 4, 2023

The Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) decision in G 2/21 related to the evidence requirement for a purported technical effect relied on for inventive step. The Board of Appeal in T 2803/18 , in particular, highlights how G 2/21 may be relevant to inventions in the field of artificial intelligence and machine learning.

Invention 98

Invention Art Patent Reporting 98

Patently-O

OCTOBER 4, 2021

New Patently-O Law Journal article by Colleen V. As the America Invents Act (AIA) turns 10, patent students across the country may be asking: if the law is already a decade old, why am I spending so much time learning pre-AIA law? Figure 2: 2021 Pending Patent Applications Pre- vs. Post-AIA (Point Estimate).

Art 126

Art Journalism Patent Law Invention 126

Intellectual Property Law Blog

JUNE 20, 2023

A patent strategy informed by the unique considerations raised by generative AI will optimize protections for innovations in the field. Patent strategies should reflect the current legal landscape as well as anticipate potential future legal developments. Part One of this series covers claim scope and inventorship.

Patent 130

Patent Invention Art Patent Application 130

The IPKat

JANUARY 5, 2022

The EPO Guidelines for Examination require the description of a patent application to summarise the background art ( F-II-4.3 ). This requirement usually manifests with a request from the Examiner for the description to be amended to identify the closest prior art. D8 is a patent relating to a filing unit. Not a robot?

Art 113

Art Patent Application Patent Invention 113

IP Watchdog

NOVEMBER 15, 2023

Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Kathi Vidal today designated as precedential a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decision from March of this year that held a precedential U.S.

Art 98

Art Designs Design Invention 98

IP Watchdog

AUGUST 18, 2021

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed in part, reversed in part, vacated in part, and remanded two final written decisions from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) involving inter partes review (IPR) proceedings that affirmed the patentability of two of Ironburg Inventions Ltd.’s s patents.

Art 130

Art Invention Patent Litigation 130

Intellectual Property Law Blog

NOVEMBER 1, 2023

Some of the IP issues include: i) whether training AI models on copyrighted content constitutes infringement; ii) whether the output of genAI that is based on copyright-protected training material constitutes infringement; iii) what level of human authorship/inventorship is required for copyright/patent protection of genAI-assisted works; iv) whether (..)

IP 262

IP Intellectual Property Copyright Invention 262

Intellectual Property Law Blog

FEBRUARY 13, 2024

Background Medtronic filed two IPR petitions challenging certain claims in Teleflex’s ’116 patent. In the IPRs, Medtronic asserted that the “Itou” reference qualified as prior art under the pre-AIA § 102(e). In the IPRs, Medtronic asserted that the “Itou” reference qualified as prior art under the pre-AIA § 102(e).

Invention 130

Invention Art Inventor Patent 130

Patently-O

MAY 24, 2024

GM decision, the USPTO issued a memorandum to its examiners providing updated guidance and examination instructions in light of the court’s overturning of the long-standing Rosen-Durling test for determining obviousness of design patents. ” And, like the primary reference, any secondary references must also be analogous art.

Design Patent 130

Design Patent Design Designs Art 130

The IPKat

JANUARY 17, 2023

The Board of Appeals approach leads them to accept both the novelty and inventive step of a subrange that is very close to that of the prior art, and which has an overlapping technical effect with that of the prior art. The patent ( EP3056283 ) related to a device for quickly painting cars.

Invention 140

Invention Art Law Patent Law 140

Patent Trademark Blog

APRIL 19, 2023

What does patent obvious mean? To be patentable, an invention must be novel and nonobvious. A novel invention is new, unique, something hasn’t been before. But, what makes a patent application obvious? Want to file a nonobvious patent? Who really decides if a claimed invention is obvious?

Patent 98

Patent Patent Application Invention Art 98

Patently-O

OCTOBER 6, 2021

This is an important design patent decision that substantially narrows the scope of prior art available for anticipation rejections in design patent cases. The result is that it should become easier to obtain design patent protection. There is no dispute that Blick discloses an art tool rather than a lip implant.

Design Patent 141

Design Patent Designs Design Patent 141

IP Watchdog

SEPTEMBER 28, 2022

Patents that are expected to protect a company’s most valuable innovations must stake a claim to that innovation and be equipped to defend it. This is because being worthy of patent protection doesn’t guarantee that an application’s claims to an innovation will not be rejected and rights to that innovation jeopardized.

Patent Application 128

Patent Application Patent Patent Drafting Invention 128

SpicyIP

MAY 10, 2023

Image from here On April 28, 2023, Justice Amit Bansal of the Delhi High Court passed three separate orders, all dealing with a similar issue- unclear, unreasoned orders from the Patent Office and the Trademark Registry (IP Offices) that rejected the patent/ trademark applications. Rosemount Inc.

Trademark 126

Trademark Invention Patent Art 126

Intellectual Property Law Blog

JUNE 23, 2023

On June 22, 2023, Senators Chris Coons (D-DE) and Thom Tillis (R-NC) introduced the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act of 2023 , which seeks to clarify the jurisprudence surrounding 35 U.S.C. § A mental process performed solely in the mind of a human being. An unmodified human gene, as that gene exists in the human body.

Invention 130

Invention Patent Inventor Business 130

SpicyIP

JANUARY 11, 2022

We recently came across two decisions by the Indian Patent Office (IPO) in which patent claim applications concerning two nicotine delivery devices were rejected on the ground of the same being affected by section 3(b) of the Indian Patents Act, 1970. Section 3(i) bars the patenting of treatment processes.

Invention 119

Invention Patent Art Patent Application 119

The IPKat

DECEMBER 31, 2021

The EPO has launched a user consultation on grace periods for patents, the results of which will be published in early 2022 ( EPO press release ). The EPC as it currently stands does not permit a grace period in which inventors may disclose their invention without prejudicing a future patent filing. 102(b)(1)(A) ).

Patent 131

Patent Inventor Patent Application Art 131