Intellectual Property Law Blog
AUGUST 30, 2021
In the following sections, we will discuss an illustrative list of subject areas that may offer patentable AI inventions. (1) The state-of-art AI systems are far from perfection. However, inventors often need to improve various aspects of an existing AI system to make it fit and work for their applications. 1) Training phase.
JD Supra Law
SEPTEMBER 5, 2024
The hypothetical person with ordinary skill in the art will have a certain amount of requisite experience in the subject matter of the patent at the time of the invention of the patent. By: BakerHostetler
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Patently-O
JULY 11, 2022
In a new opinion the court asked and answerd an interesting question: What if most on-point prior art was accidentally created due to a typographical error? A key to the analysis was a finding that the error would have been apparent to someone of skill in the art. You can compare the prior art linear objective lens results (Fig.
The IPKat
OCTOBER 31, 2024
The recent case T 2510/18 considered whether an invention derived from traditional remedies by dishonest means was immoral. The objections related not to the direct exploitation of the invention itself, but to the alleged dishonesty and breach of trust associated with how the invention was derived.
Intellectual Property Law Blog
DECEMBER 15, 2023
Patent 7,736,355 (“the ’355 patent”) does not qualify as prior art to related U.S. Patents 8,048,032, RE45,380, RE45,776, RE45,760, and RE47,379 (collectively, “the challenged patents”) under pre-AIA’s first-to-invent provisions. Medtronic argued that the Board erred in identifying the intended purpose of the claimed invention.
Intellectual Property Law Blog
FEBRUARY 14, 2024
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) may change how we invent: many envision a collaborative approach between human inventors and AI systems that develop novel solutions to problems together. Such AI-assisted inventions present a new set of legal issues under patent law. On February 13, 2024, the U.S. 101 and 115.
SpicyIP
AUGUST 29, 2024
Recently the MHC remanded a matter back to the Controller for re-consideration on whether the cited prior art would render the invention obvious in light of the explanation in the specification. Interestingly, the impugned order by the Controller has already held the invention to be obvious based on the claims filed by the applicant.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
242 
Let's personalize your content