Patently-O

AUGUST 5, 2024

Kaijet highlights the narrowness of the pre-filing grace period (safe harbor) provision under the America Invents Act (AIA) and serves as a reminder that there are a number of patents that would have been valid under the pre-AIA patent system may no longer be valid under the current law. July 31, 2024). 35 U.S.C. §

Invention 111

Invention Inventor Art Public Use 111

SpicyIP

JULY 4, 2024

Vandana Parvez vs The Controller of Patents , dealt with a withdrawn patent application that had been wrongfully published and then later cited as prior art for the same applicant’s subsequent patent application! And then subsequently cited as prior art by the Patent Office to reject the appellant’s subsequent patent!

Art 105

Art Publishing Patent Application Invention 105

Intellectual Property Law Blog

FEBRUARY 14, 2024

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) may change how we invent: many envision a collaborative approach between human inventors and AI systems that develop novel solutions to problems together. Such AI-assisted inventions present a new set of legal issues under patent law. On February 13, 2024, the U.S. 101 and 115.

Inventor 130

Inventor Invention Patent Designs 130

Intellectual Property Law Blog

FEBRUARY 21, 2024

patent application has a duty to disclose to the USPTO all information which is materially relevant in assessing the patentability of the invention. With the advent of such AI-assisted inventions, the USPTO is rethinking its requirements regarding the duty of disclosure. Everyone involved in the filing and prosecution of a U.S.

Invention 130

Invention Inventor Patent Application Patent 130

Patently-O

JULY 11, 2022

In a new opinion the court asked and answerd an interesting question: What if most on-point prior art was accidentally created due to a typographical error? A key to the analysis was a finding that the error would have been apparent to someone of skill in the art. You can compare the prior art linear objective lens results (Fig.

Art 138

Art Patent Invention Copying 138

The IPKat

DECEMBER 13, 2023

The case related to the novelty and inventive step of a second medical use claim. The only distinguishing feature of the claim in view of the prior art was the specified concentration of the active substance (insulin) in the pharmaceutical formulation. Is the concentration of the substance a feature or use of the product?

Invention 117

Invention Patent Law Art 117

Intellectual Property Law Blog

FEBRUARY 13, 2024

February 9, 2024) addressed two issues: (1) when the written description requirement is met in the context of a claimed range that is narrower than the ranges disclosed in the patent specification, and (2) the kind of prior art disclosure language which supports a finding of a motivation to combine for an obviousness rejection. 4th 1323 (Fed.

Art 130

Art Invention Copying Design 130

The IPKat

OCTOBER 31, 2023

The recent decision in T 0258/21 , by contrast, is the first interpretation of G 2/21 leading to a finding of a lack of inventive step in view of an inadequate disclosure of the purported technical effect. The closest prior art was identified as a journal article mentioning the use of clevidipine for the treatment of haemorrhagic stroke.

Invention 117

Invention Art Publishing Patent Application 117

Patently-O

APRIL 30, 2024

by Dennis Crouch This article explores the impact of Generative AI on prior art and potential revisions to patent examination standards to address the rising tidal wave of AI-generated, often speculative, disclosures that could undermine the patent system’s integrity. The core task of patent examination is identifying quality prior art.

Art 111

Art Invention Patent Application Publishing 111

Patent Trademark Blog

MAY 22, 2023

To be patentable, an invention must be both eligible and unique. Subject matter eligibility relates to the nature of the invention while uniqueness has to do with what has been done in the past. A unique invention must be both novel and nonobvious over the prior art , or past stuff. What is patentable?

Invention 85

Invention Patent Application Patent Art 85

JD Supra Law

OCTOBER 25, 2022

In patent examination, the examiner will cite a prior art document in order to determine whether or not an invention or utility model is novel and inventive. By: Linda Liu & Partners

Invention 52

Invention Art Patent 52

The IPKat

AUGUST 4, 2023

The Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) decision in G 2/21 related to the evidence requirement for a purported technical effect relied on for inventive step. The Board of Appeal in T 2803/18 , in particular, highlights how G 2/21 may be relevant to inventions in the field of artificial intelligence and machine learning.

Invention 98

Invention Art Patent Reporting 98

JD Supra Law

NOVEMBER 29, 2022

Innovators seeking patent protection for entertainment software inventions should be aware that all software inventions face patent-eligibility issues. Nevertheless, patent practitioners who are experienced in the art of software patent prosecution can help ensure that software inventions get maximum protection.

Invention 96

Invention Patent Prosecution Patent Art 96

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

MARCH 6, 2024

What is a prior-art search? Prior art, the term mostly used during patent applications, is used to describe all information available in the public domain before the priority or filling date of the patent application. Prior art search determines the merits of patent applications. Several bacteria, such as Pseudomonas sp.

Art 52

Art Patent Public Domain Invention 52

IP.com

SEPTEMBER 22, 2022

Invention disclosure documents are the important first steps in the IP commercialization process. Not only does it represent the first recording of the invention, establishing the date and scope, but they have been used to defeat challenges to dates of invention, inventorship, invention scope, and prior art.

Invention 98

Invention Art IP Patent 98

IP Watchdog

NOVEMBER 15, 2023

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) ruling on prior art determinations for provisional applications applies only to pre-America Invents Act (AIA) patents.

Art 98

Art Designs Design Invention 98

The IPKat

MARCH 29, 2024

The prior art cited against the patent was the patentee's own press releases reporting the success of a phase III clinical trial of the drug in the broader patient population. The European patent at issue in T 1437/21 ( EP 2981271 ) related to the second medical use of a known drug (empagliflozin) in a subpopulation of patients.

Invention 56

Invention Art Reporting Patent 56

The IPKat

JUNE 13, 2024

The cover article of the May 2024 edition of the CIPA Journal proposed a new test for inventive step using AI. The CIPA journal article proposes to use an AI derived measurement of semantic similarity between the claims and the prior art as a new test for inventive step.

Journalism 60

Journalism Invention Art Patent 60

Barry Sookman

DECEMBER 23, 2023

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems and in particular generative AI (GenAI) systems have raised the question as to whether technical advances in the useful arts or synthetic content generated using these tools can qualify for patent or copyright protection. The Thaler and SURYAST decisions appeared first on Barry Sookman.

Invention 113

Invention Copyright Patent Inventor 113

Intellectual Property Law Blog

AUGUST 30, 2021

In the following sections, we will discuss an illustrative list of subject areas that may offer patentable AI inventions. (1) The state-of-art AI systems are far from perfection. However, inventors often need to improve various aspects of an existing AI system to make it fit and work for their applications. 1) Training phase.

Invention 242

Invention Patent Privacy Inventor 242

The IPKat

JULY 18, 2024

The UPC Central Division also takes a strong stance on the patentability of therapeutic antibody inventions in Europe. The decision of the UPC confirms that the US and European approaches to antibody inventions are diametrically opposed. The decision is not just remarkable for being the first decision of its kind.

Invention 64

Invention Art Patent Patent Law 64

Intellectual Property Law Blog

JUNE 5, 2023

In particular, this case establishes: (1) which party bears the burden of proof regarding whether a “skilled and diligent searcher” could have reasonably been expected to discover prior art such that failure to include it in an IPR petition estops the petitioner from raising it in other civil actions under 35 U.S.C. §

Invention 130

Invention Art Litigation Patent 130

The IPKat

NOVEMBER 13, 2023

In particular, in this divisional patent Regeneron had attempted to avoid a novelty attack by explicitly disclaiming embodiments of the invention from the claim. Legal background: Undisclosed disclaimers Patent claims generally define the essential features present in the claimed invention.

Invention 70

Invention Art Patent Law 70

JD Supra Law

FEBRUARY 21, 2023

the Federal Circuit held that an obvious error in a prior art reference was not considered a teaching. The court explained that a person of ordinary skill in the art (POSITA) would have disregarded or corrected the apparent typographical or similar error in the prior art reference. Immervision, Inc.,

Art 52

Art Invention 52

JD Supra Law

AUGUST 13, 2024

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit addressed the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (“the AIA”) public disclosure exception to prior art, 35 U.S.C. § In Sanho Corp. Kaijet Tech. issued July 31, 2024, the U.S. 102(b)(2)(B). By: A&O Shearman

Art 70

Art Invention 70

SpicyIP

NOVEMBER 9, 2024

In his recent work published in the Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice , Dr. Mo Abolkheir argues that the prevailing interpretation of ‘inventive steps’ places emphasis on the inventor’s imaginative capacity rather than the invention itself. It confuses ‘invention’ with ‘person.’ Cipla Ltd. ,

Patent Law 105

Patent Law Law Invention Patent 105

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

NOVEMBER 29, 2022

Novelty means that the invention must be new or novel and must not have been anticipated by any published document in the world. In order to prove novelty, it must be proved that no other document in the world has any prior claim relating to the subject matter of the invention. a) Prior Publication [Section 29(1), the Act].

Art 52

Art Invention Public Domain Publishing 52

JD Supra Law

MARCH 7, 2022

According to China’s local practice, there are three steps to follow when determining whether a claimed invention is obvious when compared to the prior art: determining the closest prior art; distinguishing the features of the invention and the technical problem that it actually solves; By: Linda Liu & Partners

Art 98

Art Invention Patent 98

The IPKat

FEBRUARY 14, 2024

On 12 February 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced with a press release the publication of its Inventorship Guidance for AI-Assisted Inventions (Guidance). The guidance embraces the use of AI in innovation and provides that AI-assisted inventions are not categorically unpatentable.

Invention 81

Invention Publishing Inventor Design 81

The IPKat

NOVEMBER 19, 2022

The recent decision T 0555/18 from the EPO Boards of Appeal considered the burden of proof for unusual parameters relied on for inventive step. On appeal, the Opponent argued that the patent lacked inventive step. The question before the Board of Appeal thus became whether the unusual parameter could be relied on for inventive step.

Invention 91

Invention Art Patent Patent Application 91

JD Supra Law

MAY 13, 2024

The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has published a request for comment (RFC) on “how AI could affect evaluations of how the level of ordinary skills in the arts are made to determine if an invention is patentable under U.S. By: AEON Law

Art 63

Art Patent Invention Publishing 63

Patently-O

APRIL 8, 2024

By Dennis Crouch In 1931, the United States Supreme Court decided a landmark case on the patentability of inventions, De Forest Radio Co. 103 as part of the Patent Act of 1952, it nonetheless applied a similar requirement for “invention.” This was an improvement over prior art vacuum tubes which used weaker vacuums.

Invention 64

Invention Art Patent Television 64

IP Watchdog

JULY 31, 2024

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on Tuesday issued a precedential decision affirming the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB) invalidation of Sanho Corporation’s patent based on its finding that a key prior art reference was not exempt under 35 U.S.C. § The so-called prior art exception under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)(2)(B).

Art 59

Art Inventor Invention Patent 59

Patently-O

MAY 25, 2023

These patents, US Patents 8,048,032, RE45,380, RE45,776, RE45,760, and RE47,379, cover inventions devised to offer an “enhanced backup support” in contrast to using a guide catheter individually. Patent 7,736,355 (“Itou”) could be regarded as prior art. The pivotal question on appeal was whether U.S.

Invention 72

Invention Inventor Art Patent Application 72

Patently-O

JULY 13, 2023

by Dennis Crouch If you break it down far enough, every invention is simply a combination of known materials or steps. This is a flexible analysis (KSR) with the PTO and courts typically looking for a “motivation to combine” the prior art teachings that would have a “reasonable expectation of success.”

Invention 75

Invention Art Patent Patent Law 75

The IPKat

MARCH 24, 2023

In order to understand whether a purported technical effect may be relied on for inventive step, the EBA concludes that the substantive question remains what would the skilled person understand from the application as filed? For the EBA, the substantive question at the heart of G 2/21 is a familiar one that needs no reference to plausibility.

Invention 129

Invention Publishing Patent Art 129

Patently-O

MARCH 13, 2024

103 over combinations of prior art references. The key issue on appeal was whether the Gelb reference qualified as analogous art for the purposes of the obviousness analysis. This post discusses the analogous arts test and provides key guidance to patent attorneys in today’s post-AIA world. Daedalus Blue LLC v. Vidal , No.

Art 69

Art Invention Inventor Patent 69