SpicyIP
NOVEMBER 9, 2024
In his recent work published in the Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice , Dr. Mo Abolkheir argues that the prevailing interpretation of ‘inventive steps’ places emphasis on the inventor’s imaginative capacity rather than the invention itself. Bhuwan is a third year B.A.,
JD Supra Law
JANUARY 22, 2025
Since platforms like Midjourney and DALL-E became popular, using text-to-image models to generate AI art has surged, making it increasingly difficult to distinguish between AI-generated art and human-created works. This rapid evolution in art generation challenges global intellectual property law.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
SpicyIP
OCTOBER 29, 2024
student at National Law School of India University, Bengaluru. He is interested in Intellectual Property Laws and the dynamic intersection of law and technology, and seeks to pursue a career in academia and research. They argued that since the method was found in prior arts, the impugned invention was not novel.
Intellectual Property Law Blog
DECEMBER 21, 2023
It found that the lower court erred by failing to instruct the jury that “comparison prior art” must be tied to the same article of manufacture as that claimed. Regarding the jury instructions on comparison prior art, Columbia argued that the district court erred by failing to instruct the jury as to the scope of the comparison prior art.
Intellectual Property Law Blog
DECEMBER 7, 2023
VIP Products LLC , which held that the First Amendment did not protect infringing works that “use [the complainant’s] mark [ ] as a mark,” the Second Circuit upheld an Eastern District of New York order enjoining art collective MSCHF from offering its “Wavy Baby” sneaker that likely infringed Vans’ marquee “Old Skool” sneaker. See Vans, Inc.
The IPKat
SEPTEMBER 18, 2024
This book review of “ Transboundary Heritage and Intellectual Property Law: Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage ”, by Patricia Covarrubia (Editor), is kindly provided by Katfriend Felicia Caponigri (Founder of Fashion by Felicia and Visiting Scholar at Chicago-Kent College of Law). 116, 120).
Intellectual Property Law Blog
DECEMBER 15, 2023
Patent 7,736,355 (“the ’355 patent”) does not qualify as prior art to related U.S. Medtronics filed five IPR petitions using the ’355 patent as the primary prior art reference under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. § Teleflex Innovations S.A.R.L. , The Board concluded that Medtronic failed to demonstrate that the challenged claims were unpatentable.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
105 
Let's personalize your content