Kluwer Copyright Blog

JUNE 5, 2023

“Warhol Print” (Vanity Fair), Page 8, Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. 2021) (available here ); “Warhol Print” also available here “Goldsmith Photograph”, Page 7, Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. Hence, the Foundation’s use was non-transformative. Goldsmith, 11 F.4th 4th 26 (2d Cir.

Derivative Work 112

Derivative Work Fair Use Licensing Art 112

Copyright Lately

MAY 22, 2023

Five things to know about the Supreme Court’s new purpose-driven fair use opinion in Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (“ Warhol “) is that relatively rare fair use case in which both the original and follow-on works were more or less directly competing in the same market. Andy Warhol Foundation v.

Fair Use 92

Fair Use Licensing Copying Artwork 92

43(B)log

AUGUST 9, 2024

Visual art for examples, but can be extended to music and text. Is this relevant to fair use? Satire involves using the same style to clothe different ideas; therefore it shouldn’t infringe (lack of substantial similarity as in the Greatest American Hero case; German case law; perhaps the jury’s reasoning in the Kat von D case).

Fair Use 59

Fair Use Marketing Marketing Licensing 59

TorrentFreak

AUGUST 20, 2022

The UFC’s reputation as the world’s leading mixed martial arts promotion is the result of almost three decades of hard work and unwavering dedication to combat sports. Whatever happens, the UFC can put any fighter in a videogame 5,000 years from now and still have permission to use their likeness, complete with licensed tattoos.

Fair Use 125

Fair Use Copyright Licensing Intellectual Property 125

IP Tech Blog

JUNE 2, 2023

The Supreme Court recently upheld an appellate court’s ruling that Andy Warhol’s use of a photograph of Prince as a reference for a collection of screen prints is not fair use – to the extent his foundation decided to license them at least. Goldsmith, Andy Warhol not only used Ms. Goldsmith et al, Case No.

Fair Use 57

Fair Use Derivative Work Copying Licensing 57

Kluwer Copyright Blog

MAY 9, 2022

“Warhol Print” (Vanity Fair), Page 8, Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. “Goldsmith Photograph”, Page 7, Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. Starkly deviating from this trend was a Second Circuit panel decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc.

Fair Use 124

Fair Use Derivative Work Art Licensing 124

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 28, 2022

1] That decision shook the art world, as it seems to dramatically narrow the scope of the fair use doctrine, and raises doubts about the lawfulness of many existing works. [2] Vanity Fair , in turn, commissioned Warhol to make a silkscreen using Goldsmith’s photograph. Originals” [7] : The Works at Issue.

Fair Use 97

Fair Use Derivative Work Art Licensing 97

JD Supra Law

MAY 22, 2023

Supreme Court ruled 7-2 in favor of the respondent copyright holder in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. Lynn Goldsmith et al., By: Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Copyright Art Licensing 52

JD Supra Law

JUNE 8, 2023

The Supreme Court’s recent and much-anticipated decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. Goldsmith redefines the contours of the fair use defense to copyright infringement.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Art Copyright Infringement Licensing 52

LexBlog IP

JULY 7, 2023

A pair of copyright decisions issued in May, one involving the appropriation artist Richard Prince [1] and the other involving works portraying the musician known as Prince, explore and expand on the “fair use” defense to copyright infringement. On May 11, the U.S. 2] A week later, the U.S. 3] Graham v.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Art Licensing Copyright Infringement 52

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 4, 2023

A Few Words for a Lost Friend: Tribute to Dmitry Karshtedt (Bob Brauneis, Mark Lemley, Jake Sherkow) Closing Plenary Session: Fair use Robert Brauneis, Copyright Transactions in the Shadow of Fair Use Suppose a work does not infringe another work because and only because it’s been ruled a fair use.

Fair Use 59

Fair Use Derivative Work Copying Marketing 59

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JUNE 20, 2023

Supreme Court affirmed the Second Circuit’s ruling that the reproduction of Andy Warhol’s Orange Prince on the cover of a magazine tribute was not a fair use of Lynn Goldsmith’s photo of the singer-songwriter Prince, on which the Warhol portrait was based. Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. Goldsmith , No.

Fair Use 98

Fair Use Derivative Work Blogging Licensing 98

LexBlog IP

JUNE 5, 2023

On May 18, 2023, the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of famed rock photographer Lynn Goldsmith against the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc.’s ’s (AWF), [1] in a long-awaited decision impacting fair use under Section 107(1) of the Copyright Act.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Licensing Cease and Desist Derivative Work 52

LexBlog IP

MAY 26, 2023

On May 18, 2023, the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of famed rock photographer Lynn Goldsmith against the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc.’s ’s (AWF), [1] in a long-awaited decision impacting fair use under Section 107(1) of the Copyright Act.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Licensing Cease and Desist Derivative Work 52

JD Supra Law

MAY 25, 2023

Last week, the Supreme Court issued a long-awaited copyright fair use decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. Goldsmith et al.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Copyright Law Art Licensing 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

APRIL 8, 2024

Of particular concern is the so-called commercial exception in Art. In an ever more fragmented digital landscape, this provision has become a key instrument of self-regulation, playing a crucial role in the allocation of rights and obligations around the licensing of copyrighted works as training data (see here ).

Fair Use 108

Fair Use Copyright Copying Technology 108

LexBlog IP

JUNE 2, 2023

The Supreme Court recently upheld an appellate court’s ruling that Andy Warhol’s use of a photograph of Prince as a reference for a collection of screen prints is not fair use – to the extent his foundation decided to license them at least. Goldsmith et al, Case No. Goldsmith et al, Case No.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Derivative Work Copying Licensing 52

JD Supra Law

JANUARY 17, 2024

It has been eight months since the Supreme Court’s landmark copyright fair use decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Art, Inc. Much has been written on the subject, including in this forum, but in many ways it was a narrow decision. By: Proskauer - Minding Your Business

Art 66

Art Fair Use Licensing Business 66

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

MARCH 3, 2022

The school moved to dismiss on fair use grounds, and the district court granted the motion and awarded attorneys’ fees to the school. (I Bell appealed to the Fifth Circuit, which easily affirms the fair use dismissal and attorneys’ fees. Nature of the Use. ” Bell sued anyways. Nature of the Work.

Fair Use 111

Fair Use Litigation Marketing Marketing 111

LexBlog IP

MAY 18, 2023

Vanity Fair magazine had hired Warhol to make the illustration; it was to accompany an article about Prince in the magazine’s November 1984 issue. Goldsmith had issued a limited license for this purpose. The license stated her photograph could be used for reference, “one time only.”

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Derivative Work Licensing Copyright 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

JUNE 30, 2021

Chapman (‘plaintiffs’) collectively filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against Netflix, Amazon, and Apple (‘defendants’), claiming that the defendants had directly and indirectly infringed their copyright over the song “ Fish Sticks n’ Tater Tots ” by using it in their documentary titled ‘Burlesque’ ( Brown v. Netflix , Inc. ).

Fair Use 101

Fair Use Copyright Law Copyright Law 101

IP Watchdog

MAY 18, 2023

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit was correct in holding that the Andy Warhol Foundation's (AWF's) licensing of an orange silkscreen portrait of the musician Prince, created by Andy Warhol using photographer Lynn Goldsmith’s photo, was not fair. The Supreme Court ruled today in Andy Warhol Foundation v. that the U.S.

Fair Use 124

Fair Use Licensing Art Music 124

JD Supra Law

JUNE 1, 2023

On May 18, 2023, the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of famed rock photographer Lynn Goldsmith against the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc.’s s (AWF), in a long-awaited decision impacting fair use under Section 107(1) of the Copyright Act.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Licensing Art Copyright 52

LexBlog IP

MAY 19, 2023

On May 18, 2023, the Supreme Court found that artistic changes to a pre-existing work, alone, not necessarily sufficient to make a derivative work fair use. At issue before the Supreme Court in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc. copyright law. copyright law. Copyright law in the U.S.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Derivative Work Copyright Law Art 52

Traverse Legal Blog

OCTOBER 20, 2022

Non fungible tokens (NFTs) , the latest vehicle for capturing, linking to and licensing intellectual property. NFTs are being used in all forms of entertainment, gaming, art and science. That NFT can be transferred or licensed to subsequent NFT owners, all of which is recorded on the blockchain. .

Non-Fungible Tokens 40

Non-Fungible Tokens Fair Use Intellectual Property Copyright Infringement 40

JD Supra Law

MAY 24, 2023

The justices' 7-2 decision addresses fair use, "transformative" artistic changes, and a 1981 photo of Prince - On May 18, 2023, the Supreme Court issued its hotly anticipated decision exploring the elusive boundaries of fair use in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. Goldsmith, No.

Art 52

Art Fair Use Licensing 52

JIPEL Copyright Blog

APRIL 11, 2022

In the past few years, the Second Circuit in particular has had the difficult task of reconciling copyright law with appropriation art, an artistic style predicated on the intentional use of preexisting images and objects. for the Visual Arts, Inc. Andy Warhol Found. Goldsmith, No. 19-2420-cv, 2021 U.S. LEXIS 25277 (2d Cir.

Art 52

Art Copyright Law Fair Use Copyright 52

43(B)log

MAY 2, 2023

19, 2022) Technically, the trademark analysis here is weird (the parties agreed that the copyright fair use analysis would determine the trademark fair use analysis; the plaintiff’s lawyer is Higbee, FWIW), but the trademark claim is so clearly Dastar -barred and parasitic on the copyright claims that it’s hard to object.

Art 59

Art Fair Use Marketing Marketing 59

JD Supra Law

JUNE 16, 2023

In a highly anticipated ruling, the Supreme Court found that the Andy Warhol Foundation (“AWF”)’s licensing of “Orange Prince” to Condé Nast was not “fair use” of a Lynn Goldsmith photograph that served as the basis for Andy Warhol’s Prince Series. By: Irwin IP LLP

Art 52

Art Fair Use Licensing IP 52

Art Law Journal

JULY 31, 2020

Knowing more about copyright and fair use will help you determine what is yours to use and what is off limits. Nicole Martinez.

Fair Use 73

Fair Use Blogging Copyright Social Media 73

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

NOVEMBER 27, 2021

The Doctrine of Fair Use is a concept that originates from the case of Folsom vs. Marsh. Justice Story observed in his judgement, when the courts of law decide on cases like this, they must look to the nature and objects of the selection mode, the quantity and value of material used. Percentage of Original Material Used.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Copyright Law Copyright Law 52

The IPKat

OCTOBER 14, 2024

It is not necessary for a simple consent that the right holder exposes its work actively to third party use in a particular way. The fact that the exception of incidental works in Art. The Court held that a simple consent does not grant any rights to the user (unlike a license or a contract regarding the use of the work).

Copyright 116

Copyright Copyright Notice Licensing Art 116

LexBlog IP

MAY 19, 2023

In 1984, Vanity Fair sought to license the photograph for an “artist reference” in a story about the musician. Goldsmith agreed to license a one-time use of the photograph with full attribution. The first factor of fair use considers the nature of and reasons for a copier’s use of an original work. [4]

Licensing 52

Licensing Fair Use Copyright Derivative Work 52

Velocity of Content

JULY 31, 2024

The copying and retention of these works in AI systems and their reproduction in outputs implicates copyright, making appropriate licensing essential for copyright compliance. Using copyrighted content for training LLM systems is fair use. Some AI companies defend their use of copyrighted materials as “fair use.”

Copyright 98

Copyright Fair Use Licensing Copyright Infringement 98

IIPRD

APRIL 8, 2024

Introduction: The creative AI and the art generated by such algorithms and technology are raising questions in field of copyright law which have emerged recently. AI is becoming more and more advanced by the day resulting in creation of such art without any sort of skills or human intervention required. [3]

Art 52

Art Artwork Intellectual Property Copyright Law 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

SEPTEMBER 29, 2024

The denial of fair use stands, but the damages get zeroed out. Fair Use Nature of Use “Defendants’ use of the tattoos was clearly commercial.” The videogame made a commercial editorial use of the tattoo. ” I could see the fair use analysis going the other way on appeal.

Copyright 113

Copyright Fair Use Licensing Blogging 113

TorrentFreak

APRIL 23, 2024

The organization doesn’t license authorized digital copies from publishers; instead, its books are scanned and digitized in-house. Lawsuit and Appeal Internet Archive believes that its approach falls under fair use but publishers Hachette, HarperCollins, John Wiley, and Penguin Random House disagree.

Copyright 134

Copyright Fair Use Copying Publishing 134