This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
How long does it take to get a designpatent? On average, a designpatent application can take about 16 months for the initial examination. Strip out the fast-tracked design applications from the equation, and the average wait time for non-expedited design applications would certainly be longer.
Evo’s designpatent claims an “ ornamental design for a foldable bag ” as shown in the figures above. district court held the patent invalid as both functional and obvious; and also not infringed. Functionality : Designpatents focus on ornamentality rather than utility. by Dennis Crouch.
This is an important designpatent decision that substantially narrows the scope of prior art available for anticipation rejections in designpatent cases. The result is that it should become easier to obtain designpatent protection. In re Surgisil, LLP , — 4th — ( Fed.
by Dennis Crouch In a highly anticipated en banc decision, the Federal Circuit has overruled the longstanding Rosen-Durling test for assessing obviousness of designpatents. Rejecting the argument that KSR did not implicate designpatent obviousness, the court reasoned that 35 U.S.C. § GM Global Tech. Operations LLC , No.
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s recent decision on an appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to limit prior art for designpatent applications to only analogous fields may make it easier for applicants to obtain designpatents and more difficult for challengers to invalidate them.
by Dennis Crouch The USPTO is officially establishing a separate designpatent practitioner bar with its final rule published on November 16, 2023 and effective January 2, 2024. Currently, a single patent bar governs registration for anyone seeking to practice before the USPTO in utility, plant, and designpatent matters.
GM decision, the USPTO issued a memorandum to its examiners providing updated guidance and examination instructions in light of the court’s overturning of the long-standing Rosen-Durling test for determining obviousness of designpatents. There is no similarity threshold requirement.
15, 2023) , the Federal Circuit vacated a jury verdict of non-infringement in a design-patent infringement action filed by Columbia Sportswear against Seirus Innovative Accessories. DesignPatent No. Issues Whether the district court erred in its jury instructions on the comparison prior art and the Seirus logo.
Designpatents and utility patents are two different things. Designpatents protect ornamental designs, such as the shape of a perfume bottle or the design on flatware. To be patentable, however, both designs and functional inventions must satisfy two requirements. 2d 388 (1982).
Are there any requirements for getting a designpatent? Designpatents can be quite powerful. Even though designpatents are easier to get than utility patents, it is still possible for a design application to be rejected. 35 USC 171 sets forth the requirements for getting a designpatent.
What is the filing deadline for a US designpatent based on a foreign priority application? When it comes to filing related patent applications across different countries, filing dates are critical. A US designpatent application must be filed within six months of your foreign priority date.
2022) raises a number of important designpatent law questions, including an issue of first-impression of the scope of “comparison prior art” available for the ordinary observer infringement analysis under Egyptian Goddess, Inc. The case was remanded back to the USPTO 10 months ago, and not patent has issued yet.
What are the right patents for Amazon sellers? Traditional patents that might work in the courts may not be the best type of IP protection for online sales on the e-commerce platform. Since Amazon uses their own legal system for adjudicating patent disputes , sellers need to know how to play the IP game Amazon’s way.
Obviousness of a designpatent is governed by 35 U.S.C. 103, just like utility patents. That primary reference can then be combined with other references to fill in gaps that would have been obvious in order to create the “same overall visual appearance as the claimed design.” DesignPatent Nos.
The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals recently narrowed the scope of “comparison prior art” that may be used in a designpatent infringement analysis. Comparison prior art” includes references used to help highlight distinctions between a plaintiff’s claimed design and a defendant’s design that is accused of infringing.
How can an Amazon seller benefit from designpatents? Those who tend to ignore IP are the ones caught off guard when, for example, a patent owner blocks them from selling a competing product on Amazon. If you are an Amazon seller, designpatents must be considered – either offensively or defensively.
A recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has fundamentally altered the law on prior art anticipation for designpatent applications. 4, 2021), the Federal Circuit reversed a decision by the USPTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal…. In this decision, captioned In re: SurgiSil, L.L.P.
by Dennis Crouch Seirus has petitioned for writ of certiorari in its long-running designpatent dispute with Columbia Sportswear. Questions presented: When looking for comparison prior art, is the article’s function relevant in any way? Must the comparison prior art be the “same article” as claimed?
The Federal Circuit has ruled that “comparison prior art” used in infringement analysis in a designpatent infringement must be applied to the same “article of manufacture” that is identified in the claim of the designpatent. By: AEON Law
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit yesterday reversed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB's) finding that Campbell Soup Company, Campbell Sales Company, and Trinity Manufacturing, LLC did not demonstrate the claimed designs of Gamon, Inc.’s s designpatents would have been obvious over the prior art.
Subsequently, you receive notice from an owner of a designpatent that you are infringing their patent. You conduct a prior art search and find some references related to the design. The answer is YES if the prior art. By: International Lawyers Network
GM Global, the Federal Circuit overruled the Rosen-Durling test for designpatent obviousness, jettisoning decades-old precedent and loosely outlining a designpatent obviousness test that aligns with the standard for utility patents. By: Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP
Addressing a matter of first impression concerning the scope of prior art relevant to a designpatent infringement analysis, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit concluded that “to qualify as comparison prior art, the prior-artdesign must be applied to the article of manufacture identified in the claim.”
by Dennis Crouch The United States Patent and Trademark Office has proposed a rule to create a separate designpatent practitioner bar. As it stands today, there is a single patent bar that applies to those practicing in patent matters before the USPTO, covering utility, plant, and designpatents.
The blanket-like sweatshirt company that grew out of a "Shark Tank" pitch has lost two of its designpatents in Arizona federal court after accusing a rival of infringement and then losing a priority date ruling that turned its own "Comfy" sweatshirts into patent-invalidating prior art.
did we see court decisions that will, in the case of one, and could in the case of another, have significant impact on designpatent jurisprudence. In one, the court addressed an issue of first impression – whether comparison prior art in an infringement analyses must involve the. However, nowhere more than the U.S.
The almost-full Federal Circuit (minus two judges) has overturned the Rosen-Durling test for determining designpatent obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § Under 35 U.S.C. §
In a much-anticipated opinion that addresses an issue of first impression, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit narrowed the scope of “comparison prior art”―prior art considered by the fact finder during an infringement analysis―to the same article of manufacture claimed by the patenteddesign.
Prior Patently-O coverage of this appeal is available here.) My 2015 article, The PatentedDesign , was mentioned several times during the argument. In that article, I argued that a designpatent’s scope should be limited to the design as applied to a specific type of product.
Recently, an interesting order was issued in Patent Application No. 202417006578 ( pdf ), by Vikas Verma, Assistant Controller of Patents & Designs, Patent Office (Chennai), in the context of a pre-grant opposition (PGO) against an application by Pharmazz Inc. Image from here. back in 2010.
In a landmark decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has overruled the longstanding test for assessing whether a designpatent is considered obvious in view of prior art.
by Dennis Crouch Designpatents continue to rise in importance, but the underlying law full of eccentricities. The crux of the issue lies in the manner patent law decisions are typically written. at 415, should cause us to eliminate or modify: (a) Durling’s requirement that “[b]efore one can begin to combine prior artdesigns.
Can you see a pending designpatent application? No, US designpatent applications are not published. Therefore, the public cannot monitor or search for a pending designpatent application. Need to apply for a designpatent? Why does it matter that designpatent applications are not published?
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) clarified the law on comparison prior art in designpatent cases. 15, 2023), the Federal Circuit provided guidance on the types of prior art that can be reviewed by courts and juries in the comparative prior art stage of the infringement analysis of.
by Dennis Crouch In a previous post, I examined the important issue of comparison prior art that emerged from the dispute between Columbia Sportswear and Seirus. This post will focus on another key issue from the case – the relevance of logos in designpatent infringement analysis. Lubecore Int’l, Inc. , 3d 494 (6th Cir.
Designpatents offer valuable protection in a patent portfolio, including conferring different strategic advantages compared to those of utility patents. For example, designpatents allow for recovery of “total profits” — not just lost profits or reasonable royalties as provided for infringed utility patents. [1]
Designpatents offer valuable protection in a patent portfolio, including conferring different strategic advantages compared to those of utility patents. 1] Likewise, designpatents are not subject to attacks under 35 U.S.C. § ” [6]. ” [6].
GM Global Technology Operations LLC, rejecting as “improperly rigid” the previous standard for evaluating whether a designpatent is obvious in view of the prior art. On Tuesday, the en banc Federal Circuit released its highly anticipated decision in LKQ v. By: Fenwick & West LLP
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has announced significant fee changes that will take effect on January 19, 2025. As a patent attorney, I want to highlight the key adjustments and their potential impact on patent applicants and strategies. for most patent-related services.
Mission Impossible: Can you block a designpatent application? Designpatent applications are not publicly viewable. It can be nearly impossible to figure out what designpatent applications are pending. Suppose your competitor indicates that their product is patent-pending. This will be tricky.
A designpatent protects a new, original, ornamental design for an article of manufacture. Ornamental” means that the design is purely decorative; the patentability is based on its visual aspects. Designpatents protect only the appearance of the article, not any aspect of functionality.
government and GM Global Technology Operations in a case that could change the test for assessing designpatent obviousness. The so-called Rosen-Durling test for designpatent obviousness requires that, first, under In re Rosen (C.C.P.A., Next, under Durling v. Spectrum Furniture Co., 3d 100, 103 (Fed.
What is the designpatent infringement test? The test for designpatent infringement involves a visual comparison between the patenteddesign and the accused product. What seems so hard about looking at two designs and determining whether appear substantially similar to an ordinary observer?
DesignPatent Application: Where to Start Are you thinking about filing a designpatent, but not sure where to begin? We’ll walk through the information and materials required to start the designpatent application process. Need to file a designpatent? You found the right post.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content