Art Copyright Database Right 
The IPKat
OCTOBER 6, 2024
IPKat-approved Laion A few days ago, the District Court of Hamburg delivered what appears to be the first judgment in Europe on the construction and application of the national transpositions of the text and data mining (TDM) exceptions found in Arts. By this provision, Germany had transposed Art. 3 or 4 of the DSM Directive).
Kluwer Copyright Blog
JUNE 21, 2021
Article 17 Directive (EU) 2019/790 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market (“DSM Directive”) is currently being implemented into national law in the EU Member States. This has caused extensive debates on the national level comparable to the debate that took place when Art. 17 DSM Directive and Art.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The IPKat
JULY 30, 2023
This Kat is happy to review “ 25 things you should know about artificial intelligence, art and copyright ” by Pablo Fernández Carballo-Calero (Aranzadi, 2023, 160 p.). Now in its second edition, the book offers a primer on copyright-related challenges that artificial intelligence (AI) presents.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
JUNE 17, 2021
In a nutshell, a specialist search engine engaging in re-use of substantial parts of the database of a job adverts website was accused of violating sui generis database right. Therefore, the CJEU concludes that these acts fall under art. 33, AG Opinion). One way or another, it will be interesting. [1] by Tito Rendas. €
Kluwer Copyright Blog
JANUARY 9, 2023
As we enter a new year, we would like to take this opportunity to pass on our best wishes for 2023 to all of our readers, as well as reflect on developments in copyright over the past year. YouTube’s first Copyright Transparency Report 2021 – A step towards “factfulness” by Jan Bernd Nordemann. A vanishing right? Factfulness, p.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
MAY 16, 2022
The European Copyright Society posted an opinion on selected aspects of the proposed Data Act. The aim of the Data Act’s sui generis clause (art. 35) to reduce the availability of IP rights over some datasets is welcome. However, its drafting is flawed and risks creating even more fragmentation in the laws of Member States.
The IPKat
JANUARY 30, 2022
COPYRIGHT Katfriend Moritz Sutterer posted on a new competition tool that the German Competition Authority recently tried out against Google in relation to press publishers' neighbouring right. Reminder: last call to vote for your best IP book of 2021 by participating in the poll here !
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
137 
Let's personalize your content