IP and Legal Filings

DECEMBER 14, 2021

The United States Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit ruled that the use of Lynn Goldsmith’s 1981 photograph was not fair use by Andy Warhol’s image of a musical artist. The present case deals in the creation of the work which has a prior material, whereby the dispute is between a creator’s creativity and creator’s control.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Music Derivative Work Copyright 52

LexBlog IP

SEPTEMBER 21, 2023

Meta Platforms (parent company of Facebook) and OpenAI (creator of ChatGPT) have individually filed a Motion to Dismiss the class-action lawsuit filed by comedian Sarah Silverman and authors Richard Kadrey and Christopher Golden for alleged copyright infringement.

Copyright Infringement 52

Copyright Infringement Copyright Fair Use Derivative Work 52

IIPRD

APRIL 8, 2024

The ambit of IPR when it comes to recognizing these AI generators and whether they are also capable of copyright infringement by transforming other creators work has been discussed in detail in the article. 3] Algorithms use existing information and art to learn to create novel looking pieces. [4]

Art 52

Art Artwork Intellectual Property Copyright Law 52

IPilogue

JULY 18, 2022

Last year, Andy Warhol lost an infamous copyright infringement lawsuit against photographer Lynn Goldsmith regarding an image of the pop singer Prince. The focus of the conflict was the meaning of “transformative works” in the U.S. In this sense, the act of copying is the very medium of Warhol’s art.

Copyright Law 111

Copyright Law Copyright Law Art 111

Copyright Lately

JANUARY 23, 2023

A group of artists has filed a first-of-its-kind copyright infringement lawsuit against the developers of popular AI art tools, but did they paint themselves into a corner? Inputs When it comes to potentially infringing actions committed by the developers of AI tools, the most likely candidate is the initial scraping (i.e.

Derivative Work 106

Derivative Work Art Copying Fair Use 106

Copyright Lately

SEPTEMBER 12, 2022

Unfortunately, however, Section 113(c) is like the Generation X of copyright law—it’s remarkably useful, underrated, and largely overlooked—even by copyright lawyers and judges. Vila later filed a lawsuit for copyright infringement against Deadly Doll based on the unauthorized reproduction and distribution of his photo. .

Copyright 96

Copyright Derivative Work Artwork Fair Use 96

The IPKat

JULY 7, 2024

In 2015, Moulinsart and Hergé's widow sued Marabout before the TGI of Rennes for copyright infringement and parasitism. In a ruling dated 10 May 2021, the court dismissed the plaintiffs' claims, despite acknowledging the original nature of the characters in Hergé's work. 113-4 of CPI.

Derivative Work 124

Derivative Work Copyright Infringement Copyright Fair Use 124

Kluwer Copyright Blog

APRIL 22, 2024

Basically, because an NFT is an encoded digital metadata file of a copy of a work that can be copyright protected. That is, in an NFT there can be an underlying copy of a work of art –typically an image, photograph, piece of music, video or certain audiovisual content– that may be subject to copyright.

Copyright 117

Copyright Artwork Moral Rights Non-Fungible Tokens 117

Velocity of Content

AUGUST 9, 2022

I knew a bare minimum about him, but my trip to the museum immersed me in a whole world of Warhol that included a panoply of works from installation art to his more iconic pieces. One work , which I had not previously known about, consisted of a black room with silvery balloons moved by fans this way and that.

Fair Use 98

Fair Use Licensing Derivative Work Art 98

LexBlog IP

MAY 19, 2023

Condé Nast paid the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. (“AWF”) $10,000 for the license, while Goldsmith received neither a license fee nor a source credit. 1] The Southern District of New York granted summary judgment to AWF on its claim of fair use, but the Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed.

Licensing 52

Licensing Fair Use Copyright Derivative Work 52

IP Intelligence

JUNE 7, 2023

Sy Damle, (2016-2018 General Counsel) testified that “the training of AI models will generally fall within the established bounds of fair use.” (S. See Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. The Warhol Estate appealed, but only on the first fair use factor. Damle introductory statement, Tr. 1258, (2023).

Fair Use 105

Fair Use Licensing Music Art 105

JIPL Online

APRIL 9, 2021

In particular, it explores why copyright of a meme’s underlying content does not matter in a normative sense. In this blog I argue that copyright protection of the content underlying memes does not matter because of the relative weakness of enforcement mechanisms for copyright infringement of this scale. art I, § 8, cl.

Copyright Infringement 98

Copyright Infringement Copyright Intellectual Property Blogging 98

LexBlog IP

MAY 31, 2023

for Visual Arts, Inc. The Court held that the first factor of the copyright fair use test favored respondent photographer, Lynn Goldsmith, rather than petitioner, Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts (“AWF”). Goldsmith counterclaimed for copyright infringement.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Licensing Copyright Editing 52

Velocity of Content

MARCH 16, 2023

I speculated that this was an attempt to avoid a messy fair use dispute. As I also mentioned, Microsoft’s lawyers seem to think that fair use excuses copying for AI purposes everywhere, so I would expect Microsoft to try that defense here, given its lack of other arguments. is being used as code.

Litigation 98

Litigation Fair Use Copying Derivative Work 98

IP and Legal Filings

MAY 3, 2024

The law is an important part of protecting intellectual property and protecting creators’ rights to their original works. Fair use provides some exceptions to copyright protection, allowing limited use of copyrighted material without the permission of the copyright owner.

Fair Use 96

Fair Use Copyright Privacy Copying 96

Intellectual Property Law Blog

JUNE 5, 2023

On May 18, 2023, the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of famed rock photographer Lynn Goldsmith against the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc.’s s (AWF), [1] in a long-awaited decision impacting fair use under Section 107(1) of the Copyright Act. Goldsmith was not paid or credited for this use.

Fair Use 130

Fair Use Licensing Cease and Desist Derivative Work 130

JIPEL Copyright Blog

MARCH 9, 2022

From July 2017 to April 2018, the Art Gallery of Ontario (the “AGO”) staged an exhibition titled “ ReBlink ,” which urged visitors to “[t]ake a second look… with a modern lens:”. addition of written or pictorial elements) of a work not in the public domain and/or where the creator is still alive.

Moral Rights 52

Moral Rights Fair Use Art Social Media 52

IPilogue

NOVEMBER 16, 2022

The fair dealing exceptions recognize certain uses of protected works as benefitting society, and thereby safeguard those uses from findings of infringement. The parallel doctrine in the US tracks along similar reasoning and is known as the ‘fair use’ doctrine. Our answer is yes.”

Fair Use 59

Fair Use Derivative Work Copyright Copyright Law 59

LexBlog IP

JUNE 7, 2023

Sy Damle, (2016-2018 General Counsel) testified that “the training of AI models will generally fall within the established bounds of fair use.” See Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. The Warhol Estate appealed, but only on the first fair use factor. ” (S. ” (emphasis original).

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Licensing Art Music 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JUNE 20, 2023

Supreme Court affirmed the Second Circuit’s ruling that the reproduction of Andy Warhol’s Orange Prince on the cover of a magazine tribute was not a fair use of Lynn Goldsmith’s photo of the singer-songwriter Prince, on which the Warhol portrait was based. Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. Goldsmith , No.

Fair Use 96

Fair Use Derivative Work Blogging Licensing 96

SpicyIP

APRIL 15, 2024

Discussing the implications of unauthorized use of materials for training Generative AI models, we are pleased to bring to you this guest post by Goutham Rajeev and Vedant Bharadwaj Singh. Training GenAI: Infringement or Fair Use? Whether the Process of TDM Amounts to Copyright Infringement? Google Inc.

Fair Use 49

Fair Use Copyright Infringement Derivative Work Copyright 49

IP Intelligence

JUNE 6, 2023

Sy Damle, (2016-2018 General Counsel) testified that “the training of AI models will generally fall within the established bounds of fair use.” (S. See Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. The Warhol Estate appealed, but only on the first fair use factor. Damle introductory statement, Tr. 1258, (2023).

Fair Use 40

Fair Use Licensing Music Art 40

TorrentFreak

AUGUST 29, 2023

Authors Sue OpenAI According to several authors, large language model training sets shouldn’t be permitted to use every piece of text they come across online. In their lawsuit filed in June , book authors Paul Tremblay and Mona Awad accused OpenAI of direct and vicarious copyright infringement, among other things.

Copyright Infringement 103

Copyright Infringement Copyright Fair Use Derivative Work 103

The IPKat

DECEMBER 20, 2023

However, putting ourselves in the shoes of the artists whose voice and art are being used to feed a machine that will then copy everything that makes them who they are, it is not difficult to comprehend Bad Bunny's reaction. Did the track infringe Bad Bunny's rights? probably without having Bad Bunny´s consent.

Music 70

Music Social Media Copying Derivative Work 70

LexBlog IP

OCTOBER 25, 2023

Larson also sought a declaration that she owns the copyright to The Kindest and that the letter in the short story does not infringe Dorland’s copyright. Dorland counterclaimed for copyright infringement, claiming that Larson’s use of Dorland’s letter was a violation of intellectual property law.

Copyright 52

Copyright Social Media Plagiarism Fair Use 52

LexBlog IP

JUNE 5, 2023

On May 18, 2023, the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of famed rock photographer Lynn Goldsmith against the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc.’s ’s (AWF), [1] in a long-awaited decision impacting fair use under Section 107(1) of the Copyright Act.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Licensing Cease and Desist Derivative Work 52

LexBlog IP

MAY 26, 2023

On May 18, 2023, the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of famed rock photographer Lynn Goldsmith against the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc.’s ’s (AWF), [1] in a long-awaited decision impacting fair use under Section 107(1) of the Copyright Act.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Licensing Cease and Desist Derivative Work 52

LexBlog IP

JUNE 5, 2023

These were the hot topics in the recently decided Supreme Court case of Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. Money and copyright won by a 7-2 majority. Money and copyright won by a 7-2 majority. Warhol and his Foundation’s claim of fair use lost. Andy Warhol. And Prince, the Purple One. (Or

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Derivative Work Art Licensing 52

IP Tech Blog

MARCH 18, 2022

Intellectual property owners need to add the metaverse to places to watch for possible infringement, specifically, trademark or copyright infringement in the form of NFTs or non-fungible tokens. NFTs also may embody or use trademarks. This is highlighted in the case of Hermès International v.

Trademark 62

Trademark Non-Fungible Tokens Branding Brands 62

Kluwer Copyright Blog

JANUARY 16, 2024

The Cause of Action The cause of action in both cases is the same and can be summarized as follows: Direct Copyright Infringement (17 U.S.C. § LLaMA language models cannot function without the expressive information extracted from the alleged infringed works and the LLaMA language models are themselves infringing derivative works.

Derivative Work 131

Derivative Work Copyright Infringement Copying Copyright 131

LexBlog IP

MARCH 18, 2022

Intellectual property owners need to add the metaverse to places to watch for possible infringement, specifically, trademark or copyright infringement in the form of NFTs or non-fungible tokens. NFTs also may embody or use trademarks. This is highlighted in the case of Hermès International v.

Trademark 52

Trademark Non-Fungible Tokens Intellectual Property Branding 52

Copyright Lately

OCTOBER 3, 2022

Despite a number of solid affirmative defenses—including implied license, de minimis use and waiver—the jury was only asked to determine whether defendants had proven that their conduct qualified as a fair use under the Copyright Act. That $3,750 works out to a measly $71 for each month the case has been pending.

Fair Use 81

Fair Use Designs Design Licensing 81

Copyright Lately

APRIL 19, 2022

Over the past quarter-century, transformative use has become shorthand for fair use itself. When I first heard that the Supreme Court had agreed to take up the fair use fight over Andy Warhol’s “Prince Series,” my first reaction was “Oh wow.”. Fair use is supposed to be about balance and flexibility.

Fair Use 77

Fair Use Art Copyright Social Media 77

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 14, 2024

The class of plaintiff authors seeking to hold OpenAI liable for copyright infringement has faced yet another setback. Stability AI , which involved analogous claims related to visual art instead of written works.

Copyright 52

Copyright Derivative Work Copyright Infringement Copying 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

MAY 9, 2023

TLDR Generative AI is one of the hot topics in copyright law today. In the EU, a crucial legal issue is whether using in-copyright works to train generative AI models is copyright infringement or falls under existing text and data mining (TDM) exceptions in the Copyright in Digital Single Market (CDSM) Directive.

Copyright 136

Copyright Copyright Law Fair Use Law 136

43(B)log

SEPTEMBER 7, 2023

Each publisher defendant separately determined which content it accessed on Presto to use for its websites and in its publications; their webpages that included the screenshot of the Sowers photo would have displayed ads. Campbell sued for copyright infringement, contributory/vicarious copyright infringement, and CMI removal.

Advertising 57

Advertising Advertising Copyright Infringement Publishing 57

LexBlog IP

APRIL 13, 2022

As previously reported on this blog , non-fungible tokens (or “NFTs”) recently emerged as one of the hottest new items on the art market—artists, auction houses, museums, sports organizations and others have jumped at the chance to create and sell their own versions of these unique tokens. Copyright Claims: Roc-A-Fella Records Inc.

Non-Fungible Tokens 52

Non-Fungible Tokens Social Media Contracts Branding 52