Plagiarism Today
SEPTEMBER 14, 2022
Last month, artist Jason Allen won the Colorado State Fair’s art competition with a piece entitled Théâtre D’opéra Spatial. TL;DR — Someone entered an art competition with an AI-generated piece and won the first prize. Both online and off, AI art is making its presence felt, and battle lines are being drawn around it.
Plagiarism Today
OCTOBER 7, 2021
On Tuesday, journalist Robert Kolker published an article in the New York Times Magazine entitled Who is the Bad Art Friend? Almost immediately, the “Bad Art Friend” meme was born as people took to Facebook and Twitter to discuss the various ethical questions raised. That is, in a word, unacceptable.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Patently-O
JULY 11, 2022
In a new opinion the court asked and answerd an interesting question: What if most on-point prior art was accidentally created due to a typographical error? A key to the analysis was a finding that the error would have been apparent to someone of skill in the art. You can compare the prior art linear objective lens results (Fig.
The IPKat
JANUARY 25, 2022
Works of art, in the form of the reproduction of a painting, frequently adorns the cover of a reissued edition of a renowned novel. What preoccupied Benjamin was how to understand the reproduction of works of art, especially in his seminal 1935 essay entitled, in English translation, "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction”.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
MARCH 11, 2025
Traditionally, the purchase of the tangible copy of a work afforded the buyer or every lawful acquirer of the tangible copy the possibility to enjoy the work as long as the physical object incorporating the work exists. A copyright regime for out-of-commerce works was established by Arts. 811 of the CDSM Directive.
Intellectual Property Law Blog
DECEMBER 18, 2023
In this case, the Federal Circuit determined the sufficiency of evidence to rebut a nexus between objective evidence and non-obviousness; and to establish the objective indicia of copying. Medtronic failed to make a showing that objective evidence resulted from features that were known as a combination in the prior art. Patent Nos.
Plagiarism Today
FEBRUARY 10, 2022
Though he clarified that they were not “direct copies”, he claimed there were similarities in style, color choices and techniques used that were overwhelming to him. Despite this, he has had significant success in the art world, building a career that spans four decades and regularly sells paintings for millions of dollars.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
363 
Let's personalize your content