Art Artwork Personality Rights 
Kluwer Copyright Blog
APRIL 29, 2024
Introducing Article 14 of the Copyright in Digital Single Market Directive (CDSMD) , the EU legislator made it mandatory across the 27 Member States to ensure that faithful reproductions of visual artworks belonging to the public domain remain free to circulate and be used across the Union.
IPilogue
NOVEMBER 17, 2021
Collective Ownership Over Cultural Artwork. Canadian courts have not yet grappled with the issue of collective ownership of Indigenous artwork. The court ruled that the tattoo artist did in fact own the copyright in his tattoo design; however, he was limited by the personality rights of the person he tattooed.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
APRIL 5, 2023
In late 2022, the Court of Venice issued an interesting order restraining the use of the image of a well-known piece of Renaissance art by Leonardo da Vinci: the Study of the Proportions of the Human Body in the Manner of Vitruvius , also known as the Vitruvian Man. [1] Two arguments can be advanced for this interpretation.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
AUGUST 7, 2023
Foto de Alice Dietrich na Unsplash US Supreme Court’s Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. Thus, Warhol possessed rights over the creative contributions he made, but so did Goldsmith, as her creation served as the foundation for the final artwork.
SpicyIP
DECEMBER 24, 2023
In this month’s edition, he looks into topics including the Plant Variety Registry, different tales of/ takes on personality rights, and multiple leaks of key documents and their contribution in law-making. Broadcom Inc. vs Texasldpc Inc.
43(B)log
APRIL 3, 2025
The study provides evidence for the personality-rights theory of copyright law, predominant in continental Europe, which emphasizes a close personal bond between creators and their creations. While there is no significant di!erence
Intepat
OCTOBER 28, 2024
These assets can be anything from digital artwork and trading cards to in-game items, all of which are bought and sold using cryptocurrencies. The issue involved in the case was whether the use of names and images of sportspersons to create digital player cards is a violation of their privacy and publicity rights.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
132 
Let's personalize your content