Art Artistic Work Fair Use Ownership 
SpicyIP
DECEMBER 6, 2023
In St Art India Foundation v. Acko General Insurance , the Delhi High Court is faced with the opportunity to elaborate whether and how street art in general is subject to the Copyright Act, the scope of ‘artistic work’ under Sec. 2(c), the fair use exemption thereof under Sec. Image from the order.
IIPRD
APRIL 8, 2024
This article delves into the ongoing debate around the issue of right of ownership of copyright by AI generators for their novel artwork. The ambit of IPR when it comes to recognizing these AI generators and whether they are also capable of copyright infringement by transforming other creators work has been discussed in detail in the article.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Intellectual Property Law Blog
OCTOBER 3, 2023
Thaler included several new legal theories to suggest that his contribution to the Creativity Machine, such as his ownership and prompting of the software, would establish a human component of authorship. Where AI alone creates a work, this point seems clear.
SpicyIP
JULY 29, 2021
Therefore, for the purpose of this post, I will be using the word, ‘font’ to mean both fonts and typefaces. This post only deals with copyrightability of fonts from artistic work perspective and does not explore the copyrightability of fonts as code or literary works. Debunking the ‘no copyright for fonts’ Argument.
IP and Legal Filings
NOVEMBER 11, 2022
Once a work is created, in most cases, the creator will automatically enjoy copyright protection in all 164 member countries of the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works including all European Union countries and China. The Copyright Law contains a list of twelve acts which constitute fair use.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
OCTOBER 17, 2023
Image from DALL-E 3 Introduction Generative AI is disrupting the creative process(es) of intellectual works on an unparalleled scale. More and more AI systems offer services that push users’ production capacity for new literary and artistic works beyond unforeseen barriers. Firstly, the amendment 399 to Art.
LexBlog IP
OCTOBER 3, 2023
Thaler included several new legal theories to suggest that his contribution to the Creativity Machine, such as his ownership and prompting of the software, would establish a human component of authorship. ” However, such statements contradicted the application record, which stated that the AI created the work on its own.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
49 
Let's personalize your content