Remove Art Remove Art Law Remove Copyright Law
article thumbnail

Who Owns the Copyright in Your Tattoo Art?

Art Law Journal

You’re considering a lot of different things when thinking about inking a new tattoo, but copyright infringement probably isn’t one of them. Nicole Martinez.

Art 77
article thumbnail

Who Owns the Copyright in Your Tattoo Art?

Art Law Journal

You’re considering a lot of different things when thinking about inking a new tattoo, but copyright infringement probably isn’t one of them. The post Who Owns the Copyright in Your Tattoo Art? appeared first on Art Business Journal.

Art 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Who Really Owns All the Mind-Blowing AI Computer Art Flooding the Internet?

Art Law Journal

Are you using AI like Dall-e or MidJourney to create Art? Find out how copyright law applies to computer art created through generative AI.

Art 52
article thumbnail

Saturday Sundries

The IPKat

There is a Call for Papers : submissions to be presented at the congress (any topic that uses economic analysis to better understand any issue related to Copyright) can be emailed to congress@serci.org by June 30th, 2024. On September 19, 2024 , our PermaKat Prof. You can register here.

article thumbnail

Sunday Surprises

The IPKat

He holds an MA in Art Law and Art Management from the International Hellenic University and an LLM in Legal Theory and Interdisciplinary Legal Studies, focusing on copyright law, from the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. He is pursuing an LLM in European Intellectual Property Law at Stockholm University.

article thumbnail

"Last month, three federal appellate judges in Manhattan decided they knew more about art than any old critic or philosopher" (UPDATED)

The Art Law Blog

"Whether they quite meant to or not, their ruling had the effect of declaring that the landmark inventions of Duchamp and Warhol — the 'appropriation' they practiced, to use the term of art — were not worthy of the legal protection that other creativity is given under copyright law."

Art 40
article thumbnail

No Fair Use for Warhol Prince Photo

LexBlog IP

Art Law in Session To illustrate, Vanity Fair paid the Andy Warhol Foundation $10,000 to use his work (which borrowed significantly from Goldsmith’s photo), while People paid Goldsmith $1,000 for her image. He gained notoriety because of how close he walked the line between outright plagiarism and transformative art.