Who Owns the Copyright in Your Tattoo Art?
Art Law Journal
MARCH 25, 2021
You’re considering a lot of different things when thinking about inking a new tattoo, but copyright infringement probably isn’t one of them. Nicole Martinez.
Art Art Law Copyright Law 
77 
Who Owns the Copyright in Your Tattoo Art?
Art Law Journal
MARCH 25, 2021
You’re considering a lot of different things when thinking about inking a new tattoo, but copyright infringement probably isn’t one of them. The post Who Owns the Copyright in Your Tattoo Art? appeared first on Art Business Journal.
Join 9,000+
Insiders
Sign Up for our Newsletter
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Trending Sources
Who Really Owns All the Mind-Blowing AI Computer Art Flooding the Internet?
Art Law Journal
FEBRUARY 3, 2023
Are you using AI like Dall-e or MidJourney to create Art? Find out how copyright law applies to computer art created through generative AI.
Prince, Prince, Prints: Will the Supreme Court Revisit Fair Use?
LexBlog IP
FEBRUARY 28, 2022
1] That decision shook the art world, as it seems to dramatically narrow the scope of the fair use doctrine, and raises doubts about the lawfulness of many existing works. [2] Now the Warhol Foundation has petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review of the Second Circuit’s amended decision. [6] 1183 (2021).
Sunday Surprises
The IPKat
FEBRUARY 25, 2024
He holds an MA in Art Law and Art Management from the International Hellenic University and an LLM in Legal Theory and Interdisciplinary Legal Studies, focusing on copyright law, from the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. He is pursuing an LLM in European Intellectual Property Law at Stockholm University.
"Last month, three federal appellate judges in Manhattan decided they knew more about art than any old critic or philosopher" (UPDATED)
The Art Law Blog
APRIL 5, 2021
"Whether they quite meant to or not, their ruling had the effect of declaring that the landmark inventions of Duchamp and Warhol — the 'appropriation' they practiced, to use the term of art — were not worthy of the legal protection that other creativity is given under copyright law."
No Fair Use for Warhol Prince Photo
LexBlog IP
MAY 24, 2023
Art Law in Session To illustrate, Vanity Fair paid the Andy Warhol Foundation $10,000 to use his work (which borrowed significantly from Goldsmith’s photo), while People paid Goldsmith $1,000 for her image. He gained notoriety because of how close he walked the line between outright plagiarism and transformative art.
Let's personalize your content