LexBlog IP

MAY 24, 2023

Warhol’s use of Prince’s photo (taken by Lynn Goldsmith) was not entitled to fair use. The Court found that Goldsmith’s earlier photo and Andy Warhol’s use served the same commercial purpose – as a magazine illustration. I am not so sure. Take a look a the illustration above.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Artwork Intellectual Property Copyright Law 52

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 28, 2022

1] That decision shook the art world, as it seems to dramatically narrow the scope of the fair use doctrine, and raises doubts about the lawfulness of many existing works. [2] Goldsmith counterclaimed for copyright infringement. It found that all four fair use factors weighed against fair use. [12]

Fair Use 97

Fair Use Derivative Work Art Licensing 97

LexBlog IP

APRIL 18, 2022

Supreme Court recently granted a petition for writ of certiorari (docket, here ) to review the extent to which a work of art is a “transformative” fair use under the Copyright Act. Goldsmith counterclaimed for copyright infringement.

Fair Use 40

Fair Use Copyright Art Copyright Law 40

The Art Law Blog

APRIL 5, 2021

"Whether they quite meant to or not, their ruling had the effect of declaring that the landmark inventions of Duchamp and Warhol — the 'appropriation' they practiced, to use the term of art — were not worthy of the legal protection that other creativity is given under copyright law."

Art 40

Art Fair Use Copyright Law Invention 40

The Art Law Blog

AUGUST 24, 2021

The Second Circuit stands by its Warhol-Goldsmith fair use decision , even after Google v. The issue here does not pit novel forms of art against philistine censorship, but rather involves a conflict between artists each seeking to profit from his or her own creative efforts. The amended decision is here.

Fair Use 40

Fair Use Art Copyright Copyright Law 40