This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Here, the city successfully wins remand (and a fee award) in this opinion rejecting removal of its falseadvertising suit against Exxon, other fossil fuel companies, and their top trade association for violations of New York City’s Consumer Protection Law. Following a similar case, Connecticut v.
The magazine was part of a faux press tour rollout , including a fake NPR Tiny Desk Concert and a fake Saturday Night Live performance. Drake and 21 Savage jointly promoted the fake magazine on their Instagram with the caption: “Me and my brother on newsstands tomorrow!!
For example, it was plausibly false/misleading to advertise that users handling one of the products “need not wear protective equipment.” There’s a magazine for pallets! I can only assume that there actually is a magazine for storage jars out there.] ISK challenged various ad claims; the court focused on a few.
Second, a full-page print magazine ad that featured an image of a baby’s face with the sentence: “The Gerber Generation says ‘I love Mommy’s eyes, not her allergies.’ ” Smaller text below this line, next to an image of a GSG canister, stated: If you have allergies in your family, breastfeeding your baby can help reduce their risk.
One example was the November release of the Her Loss album by artists Drake and 21 Savage which included a fake Vogue magazine cover as part of the album artwork, as well as a fake version of Vogue magazine. On November 7 th , Conde Nast sued Drake and 21 Savage for $4 million for falseadvertising and infringing Vogue’s trademarks.
1, 2024) NYU Langone sued Northwell for trade dress infringement, unfair competition and false designation of origin, and falseadvertising under the Lanham Act, as well as related claims under the New York GBL and New York common law. The court dismissed the complaint—the falseadvertising claims with prejudice.
Both sides now claim the other is liable for falseadvertising, among other claims.” Defendants also allegedly infringed RCI’s trademarks by using photographs of Roberto Coin jewelry and RCI’s logo in Kings Stone’s advertising after RCI terminated the relationship. And yes even borsheims has to be held accountable.”
MedSpa repeatedly reposted the photo and shared it for articles published by a magazine and an online blog. Florida law prohibits the unauthorized publication of a person’s name or likeness for a commercial or advertising purpose without express written or oral consent. Falseadvertising: Same. All the claims survived.
23, 2023) Common sense is a big part of advertising law, as implemented by the reasonable consumer. Defendants allegedly use fake celebrity and magazine endorsements, as well as misrepresentations about price and limited availability, to induce consumers into buying “keto” weight-loss pills. Fulfillment Lab, Inc, No. followed by “$39.74/bottle”
26, 2024) Defendant, d/b/a Wonderland, operated an adult entertainment club and was one of the many such sued by various models for using their images in advertising without their consent from 2015 to 2019. The consent judgment was a lump sum and, Princeton argued, included uncovered claims; most of the images fell within the 2017-18 period.
Plaintiffs sued for falseadvertising and false endorsement under the Lanham Act, violation of their right to publicity, deceptive trade practices under New York GBL Section 349, and defamation. 2021), which considered all these claims except for falseadvertising. The court was guided by Electra v. 3d 233 (2d Cir.
May 19, 2023) Whereas the timeshare falseadvertising cases might be making law largely applicable to other timeshare cases, what’s going on in the strip club advertising cases might have somewhat broader implications. The district court concluded that plaintiffs’ false endorsement claims were foreclosed by Electra v.
5, 2024) Metroplex, a local advertising company, brought a putative class action against Meta for unfair competition. Metroplex also allegedly develops tools and systems for managing and optimizing advertising campaigns for businesses. As for stating a claim, Meta noted that most of the challenged statements weren’t “advertising.”
Moline’s public statements is by suing her for trade libel, fraud, or falseadvertising.” E.g., a Time Magazine article described the 2020 article as presenting “case studies of 33 people. Statements in other media that merely summarized the 2020 article’s findings could not give rise to liability.
Hoffman alleged that a survey highlighted in “Prepared Foods” magazine in 2018 noted that “60% of consumers. And the use of “Wildflower” to describe the honey “bolsters the impression that actual honey is in the Product.” look for honey on the product label” and that “about half of consumers would pay at least 5% more for food.
Due to being improperly registered as a Monkey Rung product and not a Roller Ready, LLC product all of the recognitions affiliated with this award (hardware retailing web site, plaque and magazine) were granted to Monkey Run and not to Roller Ready, LLC.
Nimmer even uses a relevant example: “if author A submits a story to editor E at a magazine for consideration. Still, though a transfer of the material object could normally evidence an intent to transfer the underlying common law copyright, the issue was always the intent of the transferor.
at 997-98, Rogers limited the application of the Lanham Act’s prohibition on falseadvertising “to apply to artistic works only where the public interest in avoiding consumer confusion outweighs the public interest in free expression. ” Id. In VIP Products v. Jack Daniels Products , 953 F.3d 3d 1170 , 1172 (9 th Cir.
The challenged claims were made in a trade magazine for the petroleum industry; on a blog post on Graces website; and, sometimes with greater elaboration, in direct outreach to certain customers. Moreover, Graces analysis was not published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, but rather in a trade magazine and on its own website.
The Gordon Companies also sent a press release to at least fifteen media outlets, including the Boston Globe, Boston Common Magazine, Wine Spectator, and Forbes: The Gordon Companies Partner with The White Elephant to Present a Newly Branded Nantucket Food & Wine Experience.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content