Remove Advertising Remove Fair Use Remove Presentation Remove Registering Trademarks
article thumbnail

Harpic v. Domex Advertisement: Product Disparagement or Nominative Fair Use?

SpicyIP

Domex Advertisement: Product Disparagement or Nominative Fair Use? An image of the comparative advertisement launched by Domex, wherein Domex explicitly asks which toilet cleaner fights bad smell for longer and makes a tick mark against Domex, with Harpic as another option next to it. Pragya Jain. image from here ).

article thumbnail

Serious Comparative Advertising: Broadening the Definition

SpicyIP

We’re pleased to bring you a guest post by Sangita Sharma, looking into the law around comparative advertisements in India. Serious Comparative Advertising: Broadening the Definition. It allowed the advertisement but asked the company to remove the reference to the detergent soap. Sangita Sharma.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Trademarks as a Barrier to Free-Speech: An Examination of the MetaBirkins Dispute

SpicyIP

This article seeks to examine how trademark law interacts with the freedom of expression of artists to choose the subject matters they wish to engage with, using the dispute between Hermès, a fashion industry giant and Mason Rothschild, a digital artist, as a contextual backdrop. The Hermès-Rothschild Dispute. Ltd vs Google India Pvt.

Trademark 123
article thumbnail

Trademark Infringement in the Digital Age

IP and Legal Filings

The accessibility of Internet markets and the ease with which information may be shared have given rise to new opportunities for trademark infringement. Trademark infringement has grown more complex and pervasive, ranging from counterfeit goods to digital squatting and keyword advertising.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (July 29-August 4)

SpicyIP

The plaintiff sent legal notices to the defendant but received no reply and thus filed the present suit and sought ad interim reliefs. It was also submitted that the advertisement of the plaintiff including their mark ‘RUMMYCIRCLE’ was changed to show ‘VRUMMY’ by the defendants. Primestack Pte. Les Laboratories Servier Anr.

article thumbnail

A&E's (c) and TM claims survive against former producer's new version of cop show

43(B)log

A&E also greenlit spinoffs: Live PD: Rewind, Live PD: Police Patrol, Live PD: Roll Call, Live PD Presents: Women on Patrol, Live PD Presents: PD Cam, Live Rescue, Live PD Presents: Top Ten Police Vehicles, and Live PD: Wanted. I think the court expects nominative fair use to take care of this, and that’s plenty defensible.)

article thumbnail

Cardozo A&ELJ symposium, Trademark

43(B)log

Indeed, in recent years the Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized the multiple benefits of registration to a trademark claimant, including in the recent cases of Matal v. I’ve left out the parts specific to registered trademarks and the reference to treaties. None of those were branding uses. Then, in Lexmark v.