This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Domex Advertisement: Product Disparagement or Nominative FairUse? An image of the comparative advertisement launched by Domex, wherein Domex explicitly asks which toilet cleaner fights bad smell for longer and makes a tick mark against Domex, with Harpic as another option next to it. Pragya Jain. image from here ).
Introduction Advertising is an important strategy for a company to sell its products to the customer. Advertising generated awareness about a particular product in among the masses and the reaction of the masses decides the fate of the product. To increase their sales, often companies indulge themselves in comparative advertising.
In Japan, where the concept of fairuse isn’t recognized, there’s arguably less cause for confusion. “In addition, the act of infringing on content that creators have spent time, effort, and money to create and unfairly obtaining advertising revenue, is extremely malicious and should never be tolerated.”
6, 2025) A frivolous lawsuit against comparative advertising; the court gets the right result at least. Even if the marks were famous, the comparative advertising and parody exclusions applied. [W]hen Although the court misunderstood descriptive fairuse to be limited to personal names, that didnt matter.
I've recently seen two examples of the following phenomenon: off of Amazon, an advertiseruses images of its product with another well-known product, and they do go together, but on Amazon, the advertising is different. Anyone know if there's an Amazon policy driving this?
The school moved to dismiss on fairuse grounds, and the district court granted the motion and awarded attorneys’ fees to the school. (I Bell appealed to the Fifth Circuit, which easily affirms the fairuse dismissal and attorneys’ fees. Nature of the Use. ” Bell sued anyways. Nature of the Work.
You can see his previous posts for us here. New(s) Questions and FairUse: Using Copyright to Curtail Expression? In response the Defendant claimed, “ fairuse” and “ de minimis” use. Akshat is a lawyer, interested in IP policy, currently litigating at the Patna and the Delhi High Courts.
Fischer denied both parties’ motions for summary judgment, finding triable issues of substantial similarity and fairuse. Among other things, the court held that there was a factual dispute as to whether or not defendants’ purpose in using Sedlik’s image of Miles Davis was “commercial.”
The IJR “article generated approximately $2 to $3 in advertising revenue for IJR based on the number of page views it received.” Nature of Use. “IJR has less of a case for ‘transformative’ use than the Andy Warhol Foundation did in Warhol. ” The district court granted summary judgment to IJR.
Trademark/unfair competition claims: these were all based on alleged use of the “Rose Bowl” mark in an Instagram post made on the Rose Bowl Stadium’s official Instagram account, together with an image of the official program from the 1956 iteration of the Rose Bowl Game. The Instagram post was before the court and was NFU.
We’re pleased to bring you a guest post by Sangita Sharma, looking into the law around comparative advertisements in India. Serious Comparative Advertising: Broadening the Definition. It allowed the advertisement but asked the company to remove the reference to the detergent soap. Sangita Sharma.
Creager sells Montana post drivers (made in China) that compete with the Texas post drivers sold by IDT (advertised as made in the USA). IDT created an ad for its products using two images of Montana post drivers for which Creager later obtained a copyright registration. There’s more, including public disputes on Craigslist.
25, 2022) “The softball team and flag corps at a public high school outside Fort Worth used their Twitter accounts to post a motivational passage from sports psychologist Keith Bell’s book, Winning Isn’t Normal.” He sued; the court of appeals affirms a finding of fairuse on a motion to dismiss and an award of attorneys’ fees.
These issues include whether the training of GAI models constitute infringement or is permitted under fairuse, who is liable if the output infringes (the tool provider or user) and whether the output is copyrightable. Generative AI (GAI) applications have raised numerous copyright issues.
Atari’s copyright infringement lawsuit against State Farm advances, underscoring the importance of careful clearance in advertising. In addition to copyright infringement, Atari brought claims for business disparagement, false information and advertising, unfair competition, and unjust enrichment.
Image from here Not Everyone’s Cup of “Use” – The Changing Dynamics of “Trademark Use” and “Infringement” in Internet Advertising Nivrati Gupta “New technologies give us new opportunities, but they all raise the question: How do old, familiar laws apply?” Findings of the Court in Google LLC v.
“Xfinity alleges GGT is using fake or stolen identities to obtain Xfinity phones, and that GGT ‘unlocks’ those phones before reselling them abroad for a profit.” However, GGT’s website use of Xfinity’s logo was nominative fairuse as a matter of law.
The court says the Dubtown video wasn’t copyright infringing because of fairuse: Purpose/Character of Use. ” The videos were transformative, even if parts of precedent material were used verbatim. .” However, McFree made transformative uses. This factor weighs slightly against fairuse.
Dealing with most claims this way provides efficiency for YouTube but there are times when algorithms get things wrong or complex issues such as determining instances of ‘fairuse require input from human beings. To this end, Google/YouTube is now seeking to boost its already massive team. Copyright Operations Specialist.
The court says that instead of doing a First Amendment analysis, it’s possible that a fairuse analysis is sufficient for 512(h) subpoenas (citing Eldred for the principle that fairuse is the First Amendment safety valve to copyright infringement). Case citation : In re DMCA § 512(h) Subpoena to Twitter, Inc.,
2(c), the fairuse exemption thereof under Sec. 52(1)(t); and (ii) if yes, whether the proviso of the same or ‘fixation requirement’ excludes it from the scope of fairuse. Lastly, I will discuss the argument of moral rights of the author in contending the ‘fairuse exemption’ of their work.
This high-profile case hinged on whether Warhol’s images of Prince meaningfully transformed Goldsmith’s original black and white photo so as to create a new work of art protected by the fairuse doctrine. SCOTUS held that Warhol’s images did not constitute fairuse.
On May 18, 2023, the Supreme Court found that artistic changes to a pre-existing work, alone, not necessarily sufficient to make a derivative work fairuse. copyright law, the Supreme Court focused on the actual use made, i.e. what the user does with the original work. copyright law. Copyright law in the U.S.
Does it work differently in the US where there is a separate ROP? When, how and why would you seek permission to use persona. Industries: advertising, merchandising, movies/TV, and video games. A: History differs a lot—US foundation for ROP was set much earlier. You can cluster fairuse cases.
Japan does not recognize fairuse and even if it did, experts predicted that ‘Fast Movies’ would still cross red lines. People generating advertising revenue from ‘Fast Movies’ certainly wouldn’t improve things either.
Nature of Use. It wasn’t possible to use only a portion of the photo to depict melancholy, so I guess the court is saying Kat Von D should have picked a different image altogether? This factor weighs against fairuse. Tattoo Advertising/Human Billboards. ” That sends the issue to the jury. Warner Bros.
Besides, even if a rightsholder did decide to target such home uses (which would likely be against their self-interest), it is almost certain that it would be found to be a fairuse. However, commercial use of costumes still raises legal questions.
Plaintiff has been suing various wristwatch companies over the use of the term RED GOLD. Throughout the twentieth century, many newspapers, advertisements, magazines, textbooks, and other reference materials used the term “red gold” to describe the gold-copper combination.
This article seeks to examine how trademark law interacts with the freedom of expression of artists to choose the subject matters they wish to engage with, using the dispute between Hermès, a fashion industry giant and Mason Rothschild, a digital artist, as a contextual backdrop. C) Any non-commercial use of a mark.
2K Games rejected similar infringement claims on the basis of de minimis use, implied license, and fairuse. To briefly summarize, the court left the fairuse question entirely to the jury, despite its own pre-trial order and the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Google v. Tattoo Advertising/Human Billboards.
This has caused some confusion about whether and when a commercial license from Neo4j USA is necessary to use, modify or redistribute the software in a commercial setting.” Thus, this was not nominative fairuse, but rather a use that created the misleading perception that defendants’ products were Neo4j products.
Video game publisher Atari Interactive has launched a copyright infringement lawsuit against State Farm, claiming that the insurer improperly appropriated artwork from Atari’s 1983 arcade game “Crystal Castles” for an advertising campaign as part of a “cynical plot” to resonate with fickle millennial and Gen Z consumers.
” Second, Bayside said that copyright already accommodates First Amendment considerations via the fairuse defense (citing the Reddit case ). Nature of the use. The photos were already published, which weighs in favor of fairuse. ” This also weighs in favor of fairuse (?). Amount taken.
The court previously denied summary judgment on nominative fairuse, treating it as a balancing test: LHB needed to use “Taser” to refer to Axon’s product, but used too much (it was a former distributor), and there were genuine disputes of fact on whether it did anything else to suggest endorsement.
The denial of fairuse stands, but the damages get zeroed out. FairUse Nature of Use “Defendants’ use of the tattoos was clearly commercial.” The videogame made a commercial editorial use of the tattoo. ” I could see the fairuse analysis going the other way on appeal.
Terms such as DMCA, copyright strike and fairuse are now regular features in YouTube content creator communities but that hasn’t necessarily led to fewer infringements or happier rightsholders. Seventeen years later, with billions of internet users now both consumers and creators of content, people are becoming more educated.
J & J's advertising and sales figures were "quite impressive." In its answer, however, it did raise the issue of parody, claiming no likelihood of confusion and fairuse. The Board found the mark to be arbitrary, inherently distinctive, and conceptually strong.
The legal question at the center of the dispute is whether Warhol’s series is fairuse of Goldsmith’s original photograph. A permissible derivative creation, or fairuse, requires transformative changes made to the original. The trial judge John G. This is not the first time Andy Warhol was sued for IP infringement.
They try to articulate claims for trademark infringement, counterfeiting, false association, and false advertising. Thus, “[i]n context, the contested button is not false association or false advertising.” They don’t succeed, especially considering Rule 9(b)’s heightened pleading requirements for claims sounding in fraud.
Instead, she gets a 12(b)(6) dismissal based on fairuse. Purpose and Character of Use. Plus, the tattoo affected the fairuse analysis because it established the impossibility of competitive tension between the tattoo artist and Netflix. For this, Cramer demanded $10M dollars from Netflix (later dropped to $50k).
2] They contended that the defendants are perpetuating gross misinformation by running fraudulent medicinal drug advertisement campaigns through wrongful use of Artificial Intelligence and are creating deepfakes by distorting images, voice, and other personality traits of Rajat Sharma, also infringing upon the registered trademarks of his company.
Unsurprisingly, the trademark claims survive a motion to dismiss, but associated false advertising claims don’t. VFB alleged trademark infringement, and that the Vampiro Cocktail label’s claims that it is made from 100% agave and with grapefruit were false advertising that would tarnish and dilute VFB’s marks.
15, 2023) Simpson sued its competitor MiTek for using Simpson part numbers for structural connectors/fasteners for use in the construction industry in its catalogs/other promotional material; the court here, after a nonjury trial before the magistrate judge, rather comprehensively rejects its false advertising, trademark, and copyright claims. (It
Professor Farley and I propose a trademark fairuse defense that would apply to any informational or expressive use of language or designs claimed by another as a mark in connection with any goods or services. Grimaldi , and later adopted and expanded by the Ninth Circuit.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content