Technology & Marketing Law Blog

SEPTEMBER 9, 2022

Also, there should not be a “use in commerce” when the advertiser (here, Troia) doesn’t actually offer any goods or services in the marketplace. And how can consumers be “diverted” with the ad copy accurately previewed what consumers could expect to get at the link terminus? That’s what gripers do.

False Advertising 104

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Trademark 104

43(B)log

JANUARY 13, 2023

Five 18 is a direct competitor of Wolf that allegedly copied its designs and stole its customers in violation of copyright law and the Lanham Act, and engaged in tortious interference and unfair competition. But what about false advertising? CV-21-01789-PHX-ROS (D. The court kicked out some but not all of the claims.

False Advertising 72

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Registration 72

43(B)log

APRIL 25, 2023

Republic alleged that HBI, its competitor in the tobacco rolling paper industry, engaged in false advertising under the Lanham Act, unfair competition, and violations of the IUDTPA. The court granted an injunction focusing on the Alcoy claims, which were false. There was no special verdict form.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Law 59

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

DECEMBER 10, 2023

The court says that Amazon “easily satisfies” this factor: Plaintiff’s claims are all based on the theory that Defendants ‘continue to allow unlawful sellers to maintain their accounts’ and ‘permit them to advertise’ on Defendants’ website. This argument has failed so many times. Google opinion.

False Advertising 69

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Marketing 69

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JULY 23, 2024

Rebecca Tushnet and I are pleased to announce the seventh edition of our casebook, Advertising & Marketing Law: Cases & Materials. Paperback buyers can get a free PDF file by emailing me a copy of their receipt showing which edition they bought. Preface Chapter 1: Overview Chapter 2: What is an Advertisement?

Editing 93

Editing Advertising Advertising Marketing 93

43(B)log

AUGUST 11, 2021

It allegedly sold or gave away unauthorized copies of the I-Codes and Custom Codes to both customers and prospective customers. Finally, UpCodes allegedly falsely claimed to be the “only source” of state amendments integrated into the model code, when in fact ICC also offers custom codes on its website. UpCodes, Inc.,

False Advertising 83

False Advertising Copying Advertising Advertising 83

43(B)log

AUGUST 22, 2022

The statements were “commercial advertising meant to sell a product, and generally there ‘can be no constitutional objection to the suppression of commercial messages that do not accurately inform the public.’” The First Amendment has long coexisted with no-fault false advertising laws. The California Supreme Court reversed.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Artistic Work 59

43(B)log

OCTOBER 4, 2021

Defendants' letter allegedly copied text from LStar Trademark infringement: LStar never specified what its trademarks or service marks were. It argued that defendants copied, but didn’t identify a particular word, name, or symbol, or combination thereof, within the highlighted paragraphs, as the alleged trademark(s).

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Contracts 59

43(B)log

JULY 23, 2024

Eric Goldman and I are pleased to announce the seventh edition of our casebook, Advertising & Marketing Law: Cases & Materials. Paperback buyers can get a free PDF file by emailing me a copy of their receipt showing which edition they bought. Preface Chapter 1: Overview Chapter 2: What is an Advertisement?

Editing 52

Editing Advertising Advertising False Advertising 52

43(B)log

DECEMBER 18, 2023

15, 2023) Simpson sued its competitor MiTek for using Simpson part numbers for structural connectors/fasteners for use in the construction industry in its catalogs/other promotional material; the court here, after a nonjury trial before the magistrate judge, rather comprehensively rejects its false advertising, trademark, and copyright claims. (It

False Advertising 64

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Copyright 64

Delaware Intellectual Property Litigation Blog

JANUARY 8, 2022

January 5, 2022), the Court granted Defendant Next Caller’s post-trial renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law of no false advertising under the Lanham Act and to take away the jury’s award of punitive damages. A copy of the Memorandum Opinion is attached. The Court granted Defendant’s motion for two reasons.

False Advertising 68

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Law 68

43(B)log

JANUARY 19, 2022

14, 2022) Once in a blue moon, a false advertising-based antitrust claim survives a motion to dismiss in a circuit that imposes a list of excessive requirements on such claims. Consumers and advertisers adequately alleged that Facebook has monopoly power in social network/social media (consumers) and social advertising markets.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Privacy 59

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

AUGUST 11, 2022

Rebecca Tushnet and I are pleased to announce the sixth edition of our casebook, Advertising & Marketing Law: Cases & Materials. Price: $9.99. * Print-on-demand hard copy from Amazon. Buyers of the hard copy can also get a free PDF file by emailing me a copy of their receipt showing which edition they bought.

Editing 124

Editing Advertising Advertising Marketing 124

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 8, 2022

January 5, 2022), the Court granted Defendant Next Caller’s post-trial renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law of no false advertising under the Lanham Act and to take away the jury’s award of punitive damages. A copy of the Memorandum Opinion is attached. ” Id.

False Advertising 52

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Law 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

OCTOBER 9, 2024

Fifteen years ago, courts generally avoided categorical pronouncements about the legitimacy of competitive keyword advertising. Whatever legal ambiguity might have existed then has been decisively resolved, at least with respect to competitive keyword ads that don’t use the trademark in the ad copy. Google (4th Circuit).

Advertising 93

Advertising Advertising Trademark False Advertising 93

43(B)log

MAY 19, 2023

Wowwee sells a line of dolls called “My Avastars,” which plaintiffs allege were “copied directly from Roblox’s Classic Avatars.” Looking at the side by side pictures in the complaint, this is a bit hard to swallow, but the evidence of copying/references to Roblox clearly bleed over from the TM side.

Copying 94

Copying False Advertising Social Media Advertising 94

43(B)log

JUNE 30, 2022

28, 2022) The parties compete to provide online ordinations to individuals who wish to perform marriage ceremonies and accuse each other of misconduct in advertising. Lexmark , the court held, didn’t supersede the presumption of injury for false comparative advertising. C19-0301RAJ (W.D.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Business 59

Delaware Intellectual Property Litigation Blog

MAY 15, 2021

May 7, 2021), the Court granted Natera’s motion to exclude at trial the opinions of CareDx’s damages expert relating to “corrective advertising damages.” 1117(a)(2), a successful false advertising plaintiff can recover the costs of any completed advertising that actually and reasonably responds to the defendant’s offending ads.’” Id.

False Advertising 45

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Copying 45

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

NOVEMBER 28, 2022

To many trademark owners, it’s a simple decision to sue when the advertiser includes the trademark in the ad copy. To many trademark owners, it’s a simple decision to sue when the advertiser includes the trademark in the ad copy. More Posts About Keyword Advertising. None of the clicks led to sales.

Advertising 108

Advertising Advertising False Advertising Trademark 108

43(B)log

NOVEMBER 27, 2023

Design Gaps brought trade secret, tortious interference, and state and federal false advertising/false designation of origin claims against defendants. And the complaint was full of references to Design Gaps’ copyrighted designs and defendants’ “copying.”

Copying 59

Copying False Advertising Designs Design 59

43(B)log

SEPTEMBER 20, 2021

Along with copyright claims, McCleese asserted Lanham Act false advertising claims. He did allege sadness, distress, and “profound grief” from Natorp’s copying of images of a particular landscape job, but the Lanham Act doesn’t cover psychological, emotional harm. McCleese registered copyrights for his photos in 2019.

Copying 64

Copying False Advertising Social Media Advertising 64

43(B)log

JULY 19, 2023

13, 2023) Winder, a generic pharma manufacturer, sought insurance coverage for a false advertising lawsuit. Winder argued that Concordia’s complaint alleged a “personal and advertising injury” because it included allegations that Winder copied Concordia’s DONNATAL label inserts. Concordia’s labels.

Copying 40

Copying False Advertising Advertising Advertising 40

43(B)log

JANUARY 27, 2023

24, 2023) WS sued Wayfair, alleging patent infringement, Lanham Act false advertising, Massachusetts and California statutory unfair competition and Massachusetts false advertising based on alleged copying of West Elm products. Wayfair moved to dismiss the false advertising and unfair competition claims.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Designs 59

43(B)log

SEPTEMBER 20, 2024

However, coordinate state law claims under the Ohio Deceptive Trade Practices Act were preempted by §301 because the alleged extra element—the fact that the copied matter was put on products and sold on products that compete with Scotts’—didn’t qualitatively distinguish Scotts’ copyright claim from its trade dress claim. “[B]ased

False Advertising 52

False Advertising Copyright Advertising Advertising 52

43(B)log

JUNE 22, 2022

22, 2022) Held: A warranty is not “commercial advertising or promotion” under the Lanham Act. Plaintiffs sued for breach of contract under Tennessee common law and false advertising in violation of the Lanham Act. (OK, OK, I’m not a big false endorsement fan, but … isn’t this false endorsement? Securranty, Inc.,

Advertising 72

Advertising Advertising False Advertising Contracts 72

43(B)log

DECEMBER 1, 2022

OSD Audio then sued Outlaw under §512(f), and Outlaw counterclaimed for false advertising and unfair competition under the Lanham Act, copyright infringement, and trade libel. Lanham Act: The user manual did not constitute “commercial advertising or promotion.” Thus, Outlaw showed likely success on the merits of this claim.

Advertising 64

Advertising Advertising False Advertising Copyright 64

43(B)log

OCTOBER 1, 2021

Kissler counterclaimed that these emails were commercial speech that violated the Lanham Act’s prohibition on false advertising and caused Kissler to suffer irreparable harm, including loss of business opportunities and harm to its reputation. Sending the complaint to twelve customers wasn’t “commercial advertising or promotion.”

Advertising 59

Advertising Advertising False Advertising Litigation 59

43(B)log

JANUARY 27, 2023

26, 2022) [much other stuff skipped] The parties had a false advertising dispute that went to a jury, which found that FIGS wasn’t liable for falsely advertising the antimicrobial properties of its scrubs. FIGS’ alleged copying of SPI’s products was not relevant to false advertising.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Publishing 59

43(B)log

MARCH 6, 2024

1, 2024) NYU Langone sued Northwell for trade dress infringement, unfair competition and false designation of origin, and false advertising under the Lanham Act, as well as related claims under the New York GBL and New York common law. The court dismissed the complaint—the false advertising claims with prejudice.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Reporting 59

Copyright Lately

SEPTEMBER 29, 2024

Atari’s copyright infringement lawsuit against State Farm advances, underscoring the importance of careful clearance in advertising. In addition to copyright infringement, Atari brought claims for business disparagement, false information and advertising, unfair competition, and unjust enrichment.

Fair Use 102

Fair Use Copyright Artwork Social Media 102

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JUNE 8, 2024

This case hit my alerts because of its discussion about keyword advertising, but first, I have to digest how the court got there. Still, there should be many circumstances where descriptive fair use permits the defendant to use the term “Texas tamale” in the ad copy. ” That prompted this litigation. ” UGH.

Trademark 106

Trademark Advertising Advertising False Advertising 106

43(B)log

APRIL 29, 2024

In brief: Meishe argued that Tiktok copied its code via an employee who departed. False advertising: Meishe pointed to statements defendants made in their copyright notice at tiktok.com, in the ByteDance Code of Conduct, in TikTok’s Intellectual Property Policy, and in TikTok’s terms of service. Tiktok Inc., 2024 WL 1772833, No.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Intellectual Property Copyright Notice Advertising 59

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JUNE 23, 2024

After remand, the case went back to the Ninth Circuit, which held that anti-threat classifications might be Lanham Act false advertising. Lanham Act Commercial Advertising or Promotion. The Lanham Act only applies to “commercial advertising or promotion.” The result is ugly. I really do hate this case.

Law 59

Law False Advertising Advertising Advertising 59

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

AUGUST 30, 2023

This is a competitive keyword advertising lawsuit. This is fine, but it deviates from courts’ efforts over the years to come up with multi-factor variations specific to keyword advertising. ” But the advertiser was engaging in comparative advertising, which I think also strongly serves the public interest.

Advertising 93

Advertising Advertising False Advertising Trademark 93

43(B)log

SEPTEMBER 15, 2021

They alleged that defendants copied the program and infringed the patent, as well as engaged in a smear campaign against plaintiffs in an effort to steal market share in the pediatric orthopedic industry. I’m only going to discuss the false advertising aspects. The answer depends on industry practice.

Advertising 59

Advertising Advertising Social Media False Advertising 59

43(B)log

OCTOBER 12, 2022

The Lanham Act claims were styled as false association, “false association with celebrity status,” false designation of origin, and false advertising. Allegedly, these statements, plus the use of the horses’ names as given by La Dolfina, constituted false advertising and false association.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Ownership 59

43(B)log

JANUARY 27, 2023

Spiralverse removed the original paperback glue bindings from the copies it purchased, punched holes in the pages, and installed spiral bindings. Spiralverse listed its modified copies for sale on Amazon at prices of $29.99 Was this literally false? It’s desirable for making it easier to turn pages for performance etc.

Derivative Work 75

Derivative Work False Advertising Advertising Advertising 75