This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
6, 2022) The district court reverses the bankruptcy court ruling ( discussed here ) that held that false advertising had interfered with the debtor’s estate in violation of the automatic stay. Windstream has a 2-year contract. With Spectrum there are no contracts. Plus, we will buy you out of your current contract up to $500.”
5, 2022) The court finds that, contrary to the district court’s holding, at least some of the underlying lawsuit’s allegations claimed that Vitamin Energy made disparaging statements about 5-hour Energy, thus triggering the insurer’s duty to defend under its “advertising injury” policy.
Prager tried a variety of contract-based workarounds to Section 230. At most, the Advertiser-friendly content guidelines permit users to “request human review of [monetization] decisions made by [defendants’] automated systems.” Note how this explicitly covers both leave-up and takedown decisions.
The arbitrator’s decision itself is filed under seal, but the court recaps the arbitrator’s findings: Although the contracts between Plaintiff and Amazon concerning the purchase of the diet pills at issue were illegal and unenforceable, the CoU that governed the transactions were severable and remained enforceable. Trilegiant.
Review Your Contracts Every Year. One of the most important tools to protect your business – your ideas (copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, confidential and proprietary information), customer relationships and talent pool – is your written contract. Franken-contracts can ruin your business. reportAd: {.
22, 2021) This case should be of interest to people working on contextual advertising. Rolling Stone litigation, though the facts are more internet-oriented. Common sense tells us that this is not a simple advertisement.” “It It is a work of fashion journalism that, like every fashion magazine, happens to contain advertisements.”
These questions are being addressed (in mostly unsatisfactory ways) in litigation involving hiQ and BrandTotal. BrandTotal “provides advertising consulting services to corporate clients regarding how those clients’ and their competitors’ digital advertisements are presented to social media users.” ” Oof.
In re Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litig., 30, 2025) This is a ruling on 19 motions to exclude expert testimony in this case, which is mostly an antitrust case; I will focus only on some false advertising-relevant rulings. 14-MD-2542 (VSB), 2025 WL 354671 (S.D.N.Y. Butlers modification of the control group.
Moritz College of Law The copyright – contract tension Stewart Brand famously said that information wants to be free. The flexibility of contracts makes them a prime candidate for restricting uses that copyright law leaves unprohibited. That still leaves a rather broad space for contract law to effectively limit the use of information.
It had favorable organic indexing that made it some money, and it bought Adwords advertising that made it more money. But over time, its organic indexing declined and so did its conversion rate on advertising. These allegations fall short of alleging anticompetitive conduct in the online search advertising market.
Shared sued Facebook for: Shared avers that Meta committed conversion (Claim 1), breach of contract (Claim 3), and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing (Claim 4) in suspending access to Shared’s Facebook pages, contrary to the Facebook Terms of Service. & Prof. Section 230.
Or, for that matter, hiQ Labs, who has effectively been run out of business by their ongoing litigation with LinkedIn, and who has been on the losing end of almost every key legal decision in their dispute with LinkedIn. And most website-scraper interactions don’t fit within those scraper-litigation patterns. Just ask BrandTotal.
12, 2023) Following a large verdict for Monster on false advertising claims, this opinion discusses extensively the requirements for injunctive relief in false advertising cases. The jury awarded $271,924,174 for damages sustained by Defendants’ false advertising and found that the false advertising was willful and deliberate. “As
False Advertising. In general, courts should not permit a false advertising claim based on a “safe” representation where the representation is rendered untrue by third-party content. ” This is a highly defense-favorable reading of the contract provision. eBay case from 2008. Implications. Apple , and Evans v.
In re Amazon Prime Video Litig., Though the “buy” button manifests consent to a contract, “certain terms and policies could fail to meet statutory standards of clearness and effectiveness.” 2024 WL 1138906, No. 2:22-cv-00401-RSM (W.D. It was also plausible that the TOS didn’t sufficiently disclose the restrictions.
The litigations initiated by the DOJ against Google constitute some of the most important antitrust actions within the last decade they focus on the company’s market position within search engine and digital advertising industries. Contracts èxclusionnaires.’
Court strikes down Maryland’s Digital Advertising Tax Act on First Amendment, Dormant Commerce Clause, and other grounds (including the Internet Tax Freedom Act). But Facebook clearly explained the differences between the charging practices to advertisers, who had the general option to choose under which system they would be billed.
IP law in publishing, especially at The Globe – who is known for being an early provider of digital media and device-agnostic content delivery – goes far beyond copyright infringement and litigation. Complying with privacy regulations, especially in IT contracts, is as important as it can be misunderstood.
Davis argued that the TOSes are contracts of adhesion. Nor can Davis point to a single instance of a court finding the Meta Forum-Selection Clause invalid as a product of a contract of adhesion. This will produce litigation tsunamis and likely inhibit content moderation decisions that promote healthy communities.
by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy Many characterize the law of copyright preemption of contracts as a circuit split. It’s not that half of federal judges have adopted one clear stance on copyright preemption of contracts and the other half have adopted another clear stance. But fair use isn’t a defense to a breach of contract claim.
Compared to most social media ownership disputes, this case has featured extensive litigation, including an appeal, revised injunction, a contempt motion, and now, a motion to modify the scope of the preliminary injunction. Gutman opened both accounts after she entered into the employment contract with JLM. The court also found “Ms.
However, after years of litigation, House would become, in Twain’s words, a “liar,” a “barking dog” and a “polecat”—which I assume in the late 1800’s would have been worse than Sonya Larson calling Dawn Dorland a “Karen.” What Contract? Edward Howard House (1836-1901). ” To Dramatize a Novel.
15, 2022) The court of appeals reversed summary judgment in favor of an insurer, and ordered partial summary judgment for the insured, on the duty to defend in underlying litigation based on advertising injury coverage for trade dress infringement (depicting allegedly infringing products) in the insured’s advertising.
According to Wanjiru, Machakos University infringed her intellectual property rights, image rights, right to privacy and human dignity by using her photograph (taken by the university during Wanjiru’s graduation) in advertising and marketing of the computer packages courses it offers.
Peloton has come out on top of the litigation leaderboard yet again. As we previously blogged about here , Peloton is no stranger to trade secret litigation. Peloton filed suit against ICON under the DTSA alleging theft of trade secrets after it learned that ICON had solicited Peloton advertising materials from a contractor.
If not, then Alexander will come up completely dry after years of costly litigation. Tattoo Advertising/Human Billboards Copyright in Tattoos Also, see Q2 of my 2005 contracts law exam and the sample answer. I don’t know if Alexander is still eligible for an injunction. Warner Bros.
On the first, substantial litigation has already been launched concerning whether the data used to train these models requires payment or opt-in from creatives whose work has been ingested, often without consent. Two key issues have generated much argument, relating respectively to the inputs to and outputs from large models.
The plaintiffs lost al of the framing cases then, but here we are in 2024, still litigating framing cases. Worse, it’s not clear the users have a “possessory interest” in those bits due to the possibility that copyright and contract law that may limit what users can do with those bits. What are we even talking about?
Rule 40 restricts social media posts and advertisements published by athletes and sponsors during the Games, both in volume and content. IOC regulations are only one of the many sets of rules that surround the intellectual property (IP) of the Olympic Games.
20, 2021) In this timeshare exit false advertisinglitigation, the court excludes Wyndham’s expert. Timeshare exit entities like defendant TET used “online advertising and oral sales pitches to timeshare owners to convince them to sign up for TET’s service.” Sussman, 2021 WL 4948099, No. 6:18-cv-2171-GAP-DCI (M.D.
The book examines how the advertising, merchandising, film and television, and sports video-games industries use persona as a key component of their products. Chapter three identifies and analyses three influences on behaviour, namely; law, desire to collaborate via contract, and social norms.
Game publishers can decide what teams/players may compete, who may host tournaments, and how tournaments are advertised and broadcasted. The matter never ended up being litigated. But among these actors, whose rights can really be enforced?
But what do you do if the renovation does not finish, or the work done is of worse quality than advertised? The most important factor in if you can sue your contractor is the contract you have to complete the renovation with the contractor. A contract can be implied, oral or written. Can I sue my contractor? What are damages?
Akshat is a lawyer, interested in IP policy, currently litigating at the Patna and the Delhi High Courts. While terminating the contract, the Plaintiff had informed Defendant of the terms of termination, which inter alia provided that using Plaintiff’s content without a license would now constitute infringement. Akshat Agrawal.
Litigation ensued, with lots of claims, including the Lanham Act claims on which I will focus, though breach of contract claims were prominent and survived a motion to dismiss. The Lanham Act claims were styled as false association, “false association with celebrity status,” false designation of origin, and false advertising.
Bluegreen sued a lot of entities, but only the marketing defendants remained in the case: their role was “to advertise timeshare exit services by promoting a legitimate process to exit timeshare contracts while protecting the customers’ credit.” Any “exit” came from default.
3, 2022) Plaintiffs alleged that they employed the individual defendants in part to manage social media advertising and promotion for plaintiffs’ baking businesses, aka La Baguette. If this litigation continues and defendants wish to repeat this argument, they should support their assertion that they own the Facebook page with authority.”
The suit further claimed that the Defendant must be constrained from producing, packaging, trading or transacting, or lastly advertising, while dealing in medicative commodities or other products of any description, which bear the mark ‘RESPULE’, because the said mark is owned by the Plaintiff.
Former GuestKat Mirko Brüß summarised a Higher Regional Court’s of Nürnberg ruling in which the key issue was whether an online marketplace could be held liable for damages and injunctive relief, when a third-party vendor uses a copyright-infringing image to advertise their product on that platform. More information available here.
The court found that section 16601 applied as a matter of law because the defendant “dispos[ed] of all of his … ownership interest” in one transaction agreement while concurrently agreeing under an employment agreement and that both contracts, along with other contracts the parties executed, were drafted to accomplish the parties’ joint venture.
The litigants are in different markets. Tattoo Advertising/Human Billboards Copyright in Tattoos Also, see Q2 of my 2005 contracts law exam and the sample answer. ” Market Effect. “Plaintiff sells tattoos and gift cards for her tattoo business, and Defendants sell a streaming media service.” Warner Bros.
for trademark infringement, false advertising and patent infringement. The EMSCULPT is a non-invasive medical device designed to stimulate muscle contraction using electromagnetic energy. Indianapolis, Indiana –The Plaintiff, BTL Industries, Inc. filed suit against Plaintiff JV Medical Supplies, Inc. 5,572,801 and 6,069,279.
Mary Katherine Amerine, Reasonably Careless Consumers in TM & False Advertising How do courts treat consumers in TM and false advertising cases? False advertising uses v different framework: consider the challenged ad as a whole, including disclaimers and qualifying language. Beer Nuts, Bulls’ Eye v. Dougies for diapers.
As expected, now that most – though not all – EU Member States have completed their own transpositions of the DSM Directive 2019/790 [IPKat here ] , the time for litigation has come and, with that, referrals for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content