This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Domex Advertisement: Product Disparagement or Nominative FairUse? An image of the comparative advertisement launched by Domex, wherein Domex explicitly asks which toilet cleaner fights bad smell for longer and makes a tick mark against Domex, with Harpic as another option next to it. Pragya Jain. image from here ).
Introduction Advertising is an important strategy for a company to sell its products to the customer. Advertising generated awareness about a particular product in among the masses and the reaction of the masses decides the fate of the product. To increase their sales, often companies indulge themselves in comparative advertising.
We’re pleased to bring you a guest post by Sangita Sharma, looking into the law around comparative advertisements in India. Serious Comparative Advertising: Broadening the Definition. It allowed the advertisement but asked the company to remove the reference to the detergent soap. Sangita Sharma.
Atari’s copyright infringement lawsuit against State Farm advances, underscoring the importance of careful clearance in advertising. In addition to copyright infringement, Atari brought claims for business disparagement, false information and advertising, unfair competition, and unjust enrichment.
“Xfinity alleges GGT is using fake or stolen identities to obtain Xfinity phones, and that GGT ‘unlocks’ those phones before reselling them abroad for a profit.” However, GGT’s website use of Xfinity’s logo was nominative fairuse as a matter of law.
Besides, even if a rightsholder did decide to target such home uses (which would likely be against their self-interest), it is almost certain that it would be found to be a fairuse. However, commercial use of costumes still raises legal questions. They are part fashion, part artwork, part branding and part character.
2K Games rejected similar infringement claims on the basis of de minimis use, implied license, and fairuse. To briefly summarize, the court left the fairuse question entirely to the jury, despite its own pre-trial order and the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Google v. Tattoo Advertising/Human Billboards.
Nike claimed trademark dilution, pointing to StockX’s heavy use of trademarks in attracting consumers familiar with the Nike brand. With consumers attributing scams to Nike, the use of Nike’s marks on these NFTs have generated negative associations with Nike in a way that harms Nike’s reputation and immense goodwill.
Introduction In today’s digital economy, trademarks play an important role in developing a brand’s identity, establishing customer trust, and assuring market competition. Corporations must establish online identities, such as logos, slogans, product names, and brands, to build consumer awareness, loyalty, and trust.
This ground-breaking decision heralds the expansion of traditional fairuse defenses to any trademark infringement claims where a defendant’s conduct relates, in any way, to the broad category of activity considered “expressive” under the First Amendment. VIP Products LLC. Neither of these prongs is easy [for a plaintiff] to meet.”.
Dabur alleged that these depictions were disparaging their trademarks, infringing their copyright, could mislead viewers and negatively impact their brand. Way Forward These incidents raise pertinent questions about the regulatory frameworks governing advertisements. Anchor ( para 64 )).
VIP Products LLC ] A trademark dispute at the Supreme Court involving a dog chew toy and a famous brand of whisky may have serious implications for trademark and free speech rights. Jack Daniel’s contends this design infringes its trademarks and tarnishes its brand. Grimaldi , and later adopted and expanded by the Ninth Circuit.
Its TOS provide that users will not use Roblox content outside of the Roblox Platform, monetize Roblox content, or imply an association with Roblox for their businesses outside of the Roblox Platform. Defendants allegedly marketed the My Avastars dolls with a “code” that could be used in the Roblox platform.
The Counterclaim alleges that Kid Car purchased “KIDMOTO” as keyword on Google and that by using ‘kid car’ in the resulting advertisement there is a likelihood of consumer confusion.” Pattern Brands, Inc., There is no evidence to suggest that Defendant’s use of the material was anything other than fair.
Vampire Family Brands, LLC v. MPL Brands, Inc., Unsurprisingly, the trademark claims survive a motion to dismiss, but associated false advertising claims don’t. Similarly, VFB alleged that a real “margarita” is made with tequila and, therefore, the absence of tequila from MPL’s Margarita Cocktail constituted false advertising.
which will determine the scope of the Lanham Act as applied to trademark infringement that occurs outside the US. The Court has also agreed to hear a patent case this term, and it will rule on a copyright fair-use case brought by the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts that was heard this fall. Queen of Christmas.
Do robust defences such as freedom of speech, right to livelihood, public interest, and fairuse offer absolute protection against infringements? 2, a marketing/advertising agency acting under the instructions of defendant no.1, Other Posts Navigating Personality Rights Does Fame Have a Trade-Off? But Defendant No.
This ground-breaking decision heralds the expansion of traditional fairuse defenses to any trademark infringement claims where a defendant’s conduct relates, in any way, to the broad category of activity considered “expressive” under the First Amendment. VIP Products LLC.
In summary, H3 says that when it showed the fight along with biting commentary on YouTube, that was fairuse, even though the video shown was sourced from a pirated copy of the PPV event. TEI), the company behind various H3-branded channels, filed a counter-complaint against counter-defendant Triller.
And, that person’s brand is their name, image, and likeness. The growth of the internet and influencer culture has raised the awareness and importance of publicity rights as the a key transferable with endorsement deals and celebrity advertising. How should we balance free speech, parody, and fairuse concerns?
This time I will be covering fairuse for trademarks instead of copyright. Fairuse in the trademark space breaks down into two categories. The first is descriptive fairuse. The second is nominative fairuse. As Erin covered in an earlier post , trademarks are on a spectrum of distinctiveness.
Fortunately for OSU, the court of appeals held that the Lanham Act extends direct liability beyond manufacturers, sellers, and those “who apply infringing marks to sales displays or other related advertising materials.” Redbubble interweaves its brand with the products it sells.”
Since copying was for the purpose of criticism, it amounted to fair dealing and did not constitute infringement of the copyright. It has become a common to modify brand names, movie titles etc. Parody is often taken as a defence in trademark infringement suits. to create memes, satirical one-liners etc., s commercial.
28, 2022) Chanel sued What Goes Around Comes Around (WGACA), alleging trademark infringement, false advertising, false association/endorsement, and related NY GBL claims for deceptive/unfair trade practices and false advertising. If anything, fame may make it easier for Ford to avoid any linkage to the used-car seller.]
Hearty thanks to Colette Durst , Stephen Lee , and Susan Perera , for generously sharing their insights and perspectives about trademark nominative fairuse. In case you missed it, here is my Trademark Nominative FairUse of Another’s Logo post from March, leading up to the 2020 AIPLA Annual Spring Meeting.
A fundamental principle of trademark law permits the owner of a well-known trademark to forbid third parties from using it in a manner that would lessen its distinctiveness. A feature of trademark law known as trademark dilution gives the brand owner exclusive rights to the mark, providing them a strong and recognisable trademark.
They alleged that the defendant was manufacturing and offering for sale, replicas of the products associated with its marks, and advertising the same on its website and Instagram profile using the deceptively similar word marks JELLY KELLY, ORAN and KINBAG. 63, Copyright Act.
Brands have recently begun to co-opt this form of communication in an attempt to capitalize on the prevalence and effectiveness of memes. [ii] On one hand, those who view intellectual property rights as a limited monopoly would suggest that even derivative use of the content in a meme is infringement on the rights holder’s interest.
In addition to alleging trademark infringement due to Rothschild’s use of BIRKIN in METABIRKINS as the name for his NFT collection, Hermès complained that Rothschild infringed by using METABIRKINS as a domain name, as a handle on Twitter and other social media platforms, as a brand name on NFT sales platforms, and as a hashtag.
In addition to making history in the remote-work era, this case caught the attention of trademark lawyers and some mainstream media ; after all, it concerns a relatively well-known brand and the intriguing question of genericness.
Though it is not easy to find a comprehensive list of all such trademarks in India (the website of the Indian TMR is so yesterday), recently advertised trademarks throw light on such activity. Some examples under class 9 include: S.No. Application date. Description (shortened). Feb 25, 2022.
Both sides now claim the other is liable for false advertising, among other claims.” Defendants also allegedly infringed RCI’s trademarks by using photographs of Roberto Coin jewelry and RCI’s logo in Kings Stone’s advertising after RCI terminated the relationship. And yes even borsheims has to be held accountable.”
1A and Article III standing are there, but worrisome; casualness over stare decisis does suggest courts are willing to look at things from scratch—Vintage Brands; Netchoice—everything might be up for grabs. Does “brand personality” online change what TMs are about? Does “brand personality” online change what TMs are about?
BomHC’s ruling aptly recognised that unauthorised exploitation of a celebrity’s persona not only infringes on their legal rights but also jeopardises their career and personal brand. It clearly establishes that AI cannot be used to exploit celebrity personas for profit, emphasising the need for ethical use of technology.
Mary Katherine Amerine, Reasonably Careless Consumers in TM & False Advertising How do courts treat consumers in TM and false advertising cases? False advertisinguses v different framework: consider the challenged ad as a whole, including disclaimers and qualifying language. Beer Nuts, Bulls’ Eye v. Ingredients v.
music synchronised in an advertisement) and adaptations (e.g. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit rejected Jeff Koons’ fairuse argument ( section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976 ) based on parody ( Rogers v. This freedom of expression defence was used in the Koons cases, in addition to the parody defence.
Cathay Smith: Do you foresee a point in time at which an AI might be able to make a fairuse/fair dealing decision in the moment? But fairuse/dealing typically involves reproduction of a limited portion, and AI could calculate portion. EFF doesn’t want fairuse cases in the system; MPAA does.
She would create a dataset of sound files consisting of Drake acapella vocals (stripped from the music tracks using a vocal separator) and run the data through software used to train the voice model. They may also be interested in licensing their sound recordings for AI training purposes.)
Today, in a unanimous decision , the Supreme Court held that the First Amendment will not protect an infringers’ use of a confusingly similar trademark for its goods – even if it is a humorous parody. Without getting into whether VIP’s use was not, in fact, “commercial,” the Court reasoned that the “ ‘non-commercial use’ exclusion.
Trademark infringement without prior consent: As per the initial complaint, filed in a “District Court in New York,” StockX is issuing, advertising, and selling NFTs bearing Nike’s trademarks at high prices without Nike’s approval or authorization. NIKE’S CONTENTION: i.
Tiffany is world renowned jewellery brand famous for selling diamond engagement rings since 19 th century. Costco contended that “Tiffany” is not just a brand name but also a recognised term for ring setting which is not infringement as they have been using it in good faith.
In addition to alleging trademark infringement due to Rothschild’s use of BIRKIN in METABIRKINS as the name for his NFT collection, Hermès complained that Rothschild infringed by using METABIRKINS as a domain name, as a handle on Twitter and other social media platforms, as a brand name on NFT sales platforms, and as a hashtag.
Introduction The issue came to light when one of the founders of a company named Dorje Teas put up a post on LinkedIn claiming that they have been served a copyright infringement notice by Shark Tank India for the unauthorized use of clips of their pitch on the show to advertise on Youtube and Meta ads.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content