This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
These VPN providers emphasize in advertisements that they delete their end users’ log access records so their identities will never be disclosed to copyright owners or law enforcement. . “[S]ome unscrupulous VPN providers have taken advantage of this widely known risk by promoting their VPN services as essential tools for piracy.
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit is set to consider the use of terms like “patented,” “proprietary,” and “exclusive” in commercial advertising can be actionable under § 43(a)(1)(B) of the Lanham Act when their use is not entirely accurate. Crocs largely prevailed in those actions. ” Dawgs brief.
Earlier this year, I blogged a ruling holding that Seeking Arrangements’ trademark infringement claim against Luxy could proceed because Luxy included Seeking Arrangements’ purported trademarks in its keyword metatags. More Posts About Keyword Advertising. The defense runs Luxy, a competitor. Yes, this was a 2021 decision.
Rebecca Tushnet and I are pleased to announce the sixth edition of our casebook, Advertising & Marketing Law: Cases & Materials. We also have two online-only chapters on housing discrimination (Chapter 20) and political advertising (Chapter 21), both also freely downloadable. Chapter 2: What is an Advertisement?
Also, there should not be a “use in commerce” when the advertiser (here, Troia) doesn’t actually offer any goods or services in the marketplace. As the court says later, “it seems unlikely that an Internet user who reads defendant’s advertisements would believe that they belong to or are endorsed by plaintiffs.”
Advertising/E-Commerce. While such social media posts may not have the indicia of a traditional advertisement, there can belittle doubt that these paid posts are in fact advertisements… Today, consumers face waves of advertisements amid a sea of product choices. Ariix, LLC v. NutriSearch Corp.,
Rebecca Tushnet and I are pleased to announce the seventh edition of our casebook, Advertising & Marketing Law: Cases & Materials. We also have two online-only chapters on housing discrimination (Chapter 20) and political advertising (Chapter 21), both also freely downloadable. Price: $12 * Kindle.
To many trademark owners, it’s a simple decision to sue when the advertiser includes the trademark in the ad copy. More Posts About Keyword Advertising. Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute False Advertising (Huh?)–LoanStreet Google. * Competitive Keyword Advertising Claim Fails–Reflex Media v. 2022 WL 4596646 (C.D.
Her previous guest post on the blog can be viewed here. Domex Advertisement: Product Disparagement or Nominative Fair Use? Advertising is an important factor in deciding a product’s future success. Legal Position on Comparative Advertisement. The advertising of one’s own goods is not prohibited.
I went from working in a top advertising agency, with a busy social life and exercising regularly to being mostly house bound and unable to walk for more than 5 minutes without having to get back into bed. If you scored our Dragons' Den IP Blog highly, make sure to subscribe and look out for next week's edition!
Eric’s Prior Tattoo Copyright Blog Posts. Tattoo Advertising/Human Billboards. WWE 2K (Guest Blog Post) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. In short, opportunistic lawsuits brought by a handful of tattooers run the risk of devastating the industry as a whole. An appeal in Alexander v.
According to the complaint, BetterHelp used and revealed consumers’ email addresses, IP addresses, and health questionnaire information to Facebook, Snapchat, Criteo, and Pinterest for advertising purposes”, including “identify[ing] similar consumers and target[ing] them with advertisements for BetterHelp’s counseling service.”
seeks only damages based on the reactions of advertisers (third parties) to CCDH’s speech in the Toxic Twitter report, which CCDH created after the scraping. The alleged “harm” here was a report that painted Twitter in an unflattering light and caused Twitter to purportedly lose advertising revenue. See FAC ¶¶ 70, 78; see also ACLU Br.
Fifteen years ago, courts generally avoided categorical pronouncements about the legitimacy of competitive keyword advertising. The message from the Second Circuit is plain: stop bringing competitive keyword advertising cases. This ruling doesn’t address the scenario where the advertiser’s ad copy references the trademark.
First, the court held that the damages X incurred (primarily the loss of advertisers after CCDH published negative reports using scraped data) were unforeseeable when the ToS were agreed upon in 2019. Bright Data is the Decision We’ve Been Waiting For (Guest Blog Post) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
The court says that Amazon “easily satisfies” this factor: Plaintiff’s claims are all based on the theory that Defendants ‘continue to allow unlawful sellers to maintain their accounts’ and ‘permit them to advertise’ on Defendants’ website. Last week I blogged M.S. Google opinion.
Courts in the Fifth Circuit consider: (1) the type of mark allegedly infringed; (2) the similarity between the two marks; (3) the similarity of the products or services; (4) the identity of retail outlets and purchasers; (5) the identity of the advertising media used; (6) the defendant’s intent; and (7) actual confusion. The complaint.
I have a long-standing personal policy not to give my consumer dollars to any entity that I mock on the blog for IP overreaches. More Posts About Keyword Advertising. Competitive Keyword Advertising Claim Fails–Reflex Media v. Google. * Competitive Keyword Advertising Still Isn’t Trademark Infringement, Unless….
Bad Spaniels (Guest Blog Post) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. The post The First Amendment Limits Trademark Rights, But How?–Jack –Jack Daniel’s v.
The post Hello, You’ve Been Referred Here Because You’re Wrong About Web Scraping Laws (Guest Blog Post, Part 2 of 2) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Eric’s closing note: for more on that latter point, see my decade-old thinkpiece on online trespass to chattels.].
Plaintiff visited the Mizzen and Main website on his mobile device, which advertised the company’s messaging program and offered a discount to customers who signed up for emails and texts. The post Two More Cases Compel Arbitration for Dubious Online Contracts (Guest Blog Post) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
27, 2023) Proceedings below most recently blogged here. Vitamins Online sued Heartwise under the Lanham Act and Utah’s Unfair Competition Law for false advertising about the ingredients of its competitive nutritional supplements and manipulating those products’ Amazon reviews. Heartwise, Inc., 4th -, 2023 WL 4189604, Nos.
Plaintiff argues that CDA immunity does not apply, “because Seamless actively created the profiles and advertising webpages giving rise to this suit.” Defendant argues that Plaintiff’s name or likeness appearing in a string of search results on the same page as a paywall option does not create an unlawful advertisement.
18, 2023) Prior Tattoo Copyright Blog Posts Jury Awards Damages to Tattoo Artist for Video-Game Depiction–Alexander v. Tattoo Advertising/Human Billboards Copyright in Tattoos Also, see Q2 of my 2005 contracts law exam and the sample answer. Netflix appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Netflix, Inc.
This case hit my alerts because of its discussion about keyword advertising, but first, I have to digest how the court got there. ” More Posts About Keyword Advertising * Internal Search Results Aren’t Trademark Infringing–PEM v. ” That prompted this litigation. ” UGH.
This is based on one of my favorite blog posts from many years ago, which is based on one of the great classic rock songs by Paul Simon, 50 Ways to Leave Your Lover. I’ve got 50 Ways to Use Your Trademark. On media kits; on folders; in brochures; on travel bag tags.
So it’s a nostalgic kick to blog a pure click fraud ruling in 2022. “Singh has testified that he read alleged misrepresentations about invalid clicks on the AdWords blog and that he relied on those statements before signing up for AdWords. Commonality. ” Typicality. per month and Home Depot spends $6.81M per month.
s advertisement for hats, copying Sarony’s Oscar Wilde No. The post How A Century-Old Insight of Photography Can Inform Legal Questions of AI-Generated Artwork (Guest Blog Post) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Ehrich Bros.’s 2023, Generative AI Works Found Ineligible for Copyright Under the U.S.
This lawsuit alleges that Facebook is liable for Fair Housing Act discrimination purportedly enabled by its self-service advertising tools. The plaintiffs allege Facebook had a role in “creating, promoting use of, and profiting from paid advertisers’ use of the Targeting Ad tools.”
This is great for Google but highly harmful to Genius, which, like many websites, bases its business model on users’ traffic and advertisements. Second, zooming out further, the case revolves around a topic covered on this blog routinely: data scraping. Google (Guest Blog Post) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
1-800 Contacts first appeared on this blog on February 9, 2005, my second day of blogging. 17 years later, I’m still blogging their ignoble trademark lawsuits. This is the correct way to analyze the mark similarity factor in competitive keyword advertising cases, though many courts have not taken this approach.
Lanham Act False Advertising. Second, on appeal to the Supreme Court, Justice Thomas used the cert denial as an excuse to blog his misguided free-association thoughts about why he hates Section 230. The legacy of Justice Thomas’ blogging will live on long after the Enigma case is over. Blog post on amicus briefs.
The court disagrees (emphasis added): As in Dyroff , Plaintiffs’ allegations here do not establish that Meta materially contributed to the illegality of the specific advertisements in question. At most, Plaintiffs’ allegations establish that Meta encouraged and solicited third parties to advertise on its platform.
But whether this is officially precedent or not, this line of thinking will be delicious chum for plaintiff’s lawyers. * * * Eric’s Comment : Cellphone plans often advertise they are “unlimited,” but many Internet access contracts cap the total available amount of data the subscriber can transit. (At month plans).
[This opinion from December got stuck in my blogging queue. I’m blogging it now as part of my ongoing efforts to highlight the censorial effects of mandatory editorial transparency laws.] The state can extract this information from political advertisers. The information does not need to come only from publishers.
I’ve often wondered about the conversations that take place between trademark owner and counsel before filing a keyword advertising lawsuit. Now he’s helping out by helping build out defense-side keyword advertising precedents. More Posts About Keyword Advertising. * How extensively do they discuss the risks?
Making a website that’s visible in Texas, of course, does not suffice…Grannies with cooking blogs do not, and should not, expect lawsuits from Maui to Maine.” First, HuffPost displayed ads from Texas-based advertisers. Second, it used visitors’ location data to tailor advertising to them.
Some related blog posts: Domino Pizza’s Website Violated the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)–Robles v. Gannett appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. From the court’s conclusion reaching a different result than the Scribd case, I infer the court disagreed with the Scribd ruling. Case citation : Suris v.
He has experience working with clients in advertising, fashion, FMCG, retail and technology. St Atilla , who started blogging on The IPKat as an InternKat, will now contribute to the Team as a GuestKat, whilst GuestKat Anastasiia Kyrylenko will continue our collaboration as Book Review Editor. More on Oliver here.
I’ve blogged three yearbook cases so far this year ( Callahan v. Ancestry ), and today I’ll blog two more. The court says that the publicity rights claim isn’t preempted to the extent that “PeopleConnect is using their names and likenesses to advertise the subscription membership.” Section 230.
In return for users agreeing to the TOU, Craigslist provides services to its users “including but not limited to classified advertising, forums, and email forwarding.” Guest Blog Post) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. TOU at 6-7. ” TOU at 1. at 976-977.
In addition to providing Chegg’s for-pay services online for free, Homeworkify has used and continues to use Chegg’s name in Google Advertising. Doe (Guest Blog Post) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. The horror! The domain registration is cloaked.
“Plaintiff contends that Pinterest has infringed the copyrights of 51 of his works by displaying these works in proximity to advertisements and by displaying and distributing them to users via notifications.” You’ll see to its immediate right an advertisement (a promoted pin).
The court says: The offending content is generated by Classmates and the advertisement is not merely some passive display of content created by another entity, even if it contains a picture from a school yearbook. Here, the focus is on Classmates’ use of a yearbook photo in stand-alone advertisements it uses to lure in potential customers.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content