This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has announced significant fee changes that will take effect on January 19, 2025. As a patent attorney, I want to highlight the key adjustments and their potential impact on patentapplicants and strategies. for most patent-related services.
Case Summaries Gilead Sciences Inc vs Union Of India on 19 December, 2024 (Madras High Court) Image from here The writ petition pertains to a patentapplication filed by the petitioner, which was contested by the 4 th respondent through a post-grant opposition. Read this post by Aditi Agrawal discussing these issues!
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has released its long-anticipated final rule on patent fee adjustments (“Final Rule”). Set to take effect January 19, 2025, these changes represent the most significant fee restructuring since 2020. By: Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Copyright Society's 2025 Midwinter Meeting (30 January - 1 February 2025) The Copyright Society will host its traditional Midwinter Meeting between 30 January and 1 February 2025. 2025 National PatentApplication Drafting Competition The U.S. For further information, click here.
On March 13, 2025, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) issued a decision titled In Re: Xencor, Inc. The Xencor decision affirms the decision of the Appeals Review Panel (ARP) of the US Patent and Trademark Office, which held both pending claims of US PatentApplication No.
Tanishka Goswami examines the patent data in the report, highlighting the increase in patentapplications, grants, and the number of examiners. She also explores the sectors with the most applications and compares these figures with the numbers in the WIPO 2024 indicators. The last date to submit applications is April 30.
Madras High Court and the (Mis-Placed) Judicial Economy: Analysing the Clouds Behind the Silver Lining The Mad HC single bench upheld the dismissal of a patentapplication but curiously analyzed only one objection from the Controllers dismissal and deemed the rest unnecessary to be evaluated. Read the post for more details.
Highlights of the Week Delhi High Court Stirs the Pot for Biotech PatentApplicants in India On the recent Delhi High Court judgement concerning a genetically modified salmonella bacteria, Prashant Reddy explains how the Court erred by applying Section 3 on a microorganism and incorrectly applied the disclosure requirement under Section 10.
Patent and trademarkapplicants are likely to see significant changes with their applications in 2025. First, numerous fee increases have recently taken effect on January 18 for trademarkapplications and January 19 for patentapplications. By: Lathrop GPM
CRI Guidelines 2025 is out for Public Consultations! The Draft Guidelines for Examination of Computer-Related Inventions (CRI), 2025, has been published for public consultation. Interested stakeholders can provide their comments on the guidelines by April 15, 2025. Read the post for more details. Part I] Safe Harbor in Jeopardy?
Citing forfeiture, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld the dismissal of a complaint against the US Patent & Trademark Office (PTO). The complaint sought director review of a 2018 Patent Trial & Appeal Board decision that affirmed a rejection of claims in the subject patentapplication.
14, 2025, in Lynk Labs, Inc. patentapplications may continue to be used as prior art in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings as of the date the application was filed with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled on Jan. Samsung Electronics Co.,
Since China became worldwide leader in patentapplications in 2011, overtaking Japan, the number of its applications have soared. The question today is not so Continue reading
Prior art can be defined as a well- known evidence related to your invention before submitting your patentapplication. Though, the invention is unique and groundbreaking, if an idea exist in the patentapplication is claimed through a prior art then the patentapplication is strictly invalidated.
Heading into 2025, patentapplicants should prepare for significant fee increases at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). These fee increases can significantly impact patentapplicant behavior, leading prudent applicants to evaluate and adjust their patent protection strategies.
Here is our recap of last week’s top IP developments including summaries of the posts on IPO’s patentapplication rejection of HIV drug Dolutegravir, another judgement in the long-running Section 3(k) saga, this time on the patentability of business methods and the DHC IPD’s Annual Report 2023-24. Read more for the details.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) finalized its fee schedule for 2025, which will take effect on January 19, 2025. This schedule includes significant increases to fees for design patentapplications. By: Womble Bond Dickinson
Effective January 28, 2025, the new administration suspended the Climate Change Mitigation Pilot Program (CCMPP) at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
founded in 1993 is a full service Intellectual Property firm manned with professionals in and specializes in the practice of Intellectual Property Laws including Patents, Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Copyright, Trade secrets. Majumdar & Co.who are experts in the field of Patents. Majumdar & Co.,
During the period covered by the 13th Five-Year Plan, the total amount of patent and trademark pledge financing in China doubled to over 700 billion yuan, compared with the 12th Five-Year Plan period. in applications filed as compared to 2019, accounting for 9,106 patentapplications.
The aforementioned notification has come after the All India Patent Officer’s Welfare Association (AIPOWA) filed a Civil Writ Petition (WP) in the Delhi High Court (DHC) alleging arbitrary reallocation, withdrawal, and abandonment of patentapplications and review petitions by the Information Technology (IT) Division of the CGPDTM (Case No.
by Dennis Crouch The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently proposed a new fee structure for fiscal year 2025 , which includes significant increases in various patent fees. This fits with the ongoing trend that a patent should be of a particular size.
billion by 2025. [ii] Trademark protection is available for cannabis companies (canna-brands) through a combination of federal, state, and common law sources. State-level trademark registrations confer many of the same advantages as federal registration, but are limited to the state in which the mark is registered.
By 2025, it is estimated that chronic diseases may affect 164 million Americans – nearly half (49%) of the U.S. Patenting Trends for inventions using AI in the Life Sciences and healthcare Fields. In addition, the above chart organizes patentapplication filings by USPTO Tech Center s. population.
Amreek Singh In an interesting order, the Delhi High Court vacated an injunction granted to DCM Shriram for its 303 and 404 trademark. The defendant also claimed prior use, and that 303 and 404 are widely recognised trademarks for seed varieties. on 14 February, 2025, (Delhi HC) Manash Lifestyle Pvt.
Amreek Singh In an interesting order, the Delhi High Court vacated an injunction granted to DCM Shriram for its 303 and 404 trademark. The defendant also claimed prior use, and that 303 and 404 are widely recognised trademarks for seed varieties. on 14 February, 2025, (Delhi HC) Manash Lifestyle Pvt.
In the second week of April we have a post looking closely at the Draft CRI Guidelines 2025 (deadline today for submitting comments!), Highlights of the Week Taking a closer look at the Draft CRI Guidelines 2025 Short on Time, Big on Impact: Draft CRI Guidelines close for comments on 15th April. Anything we are missing out on?
Highlights of the Week Part I: Unreasoned Patent Grants and Rejections: Taking a Look at the Division Application Filing Fiasco in the BASF SE Case A Divisional Application (DA) by BASF was rejected by the IPO citing delay in filing of application. The last date for submission of entries is March 31, 2025.
Discussing the Relevance of the Responses Filed Against FERs Issued by Trademark Registry Image from here Is FER and its Reply relevant after a mark is registered? Delhi High Court sets aside an order from the Controller General of Patents for lack of adequate reasoning in rejecting the patentapplication.
Here is our recap of last week’s top IP developments including summary of the posts on the DHC’s direction to frame a code of conduct for Patent and Trademark Agents, MHC’s decision on prior arts, and the settlement between Dabur and Dhruv Rathee of their trademark and copyright dispute.
Intellectual Property Challenges in AI: However, the rise of AI patents has also raised several challenges in the intellectual property (IP) landscape. While most patent offices, including the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), have ruled that AI cannot be listed as an inventor, the debate continues.
Azure that has further muddied already murky waters concerning the interplay between Sections 30 and 33 of the Copyright Act, and the Delhi HC ordering the removal of Zepto mark from the trademark registry. Skullcandy Inc vs Galaxy Mobile Plaza Ors on 11 March, 2025 (Delhi District Court) Image from here. The plaintiff, Skullcandy Inc.
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published a final rule introducing a significant new fee structure for continuing patentapplications. This rule, set to take effect on January 19, 2025, establishes additional fees for any continuing application filed at least six years after its earliest benefit date (EBD).
Here is our recap of last weeks top IP developments including summary of the posts on the Lodha trademark dispute, the scrapping of the UGC-Care list, and the escalation of the Nayanthara-Dhanush copyright battle. Yogesh Byadwal looks into this query of family names and trademark disputes in this post! Anything we are missing out on?
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in light of developments having to do with both the Trump Administration and the U.S. The combination of a patentapplication backlog that some now estimate to be 1.2 Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC).
Moreover, The Copyright Society will host its traditional Midwinter Meeting between 30 January and 1 February 2025 in New Orleans. Some of the opportunities include the AI and Law Research Awards program at the University of Miami School of Law, the 2025 National PatentApplication Drafting Competition at the U.S.
2025: New Year … New USPTO? 2025 is upon us, bringing with it a new presidential administration, a biannual review of filing fees at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), and some uncertainty about how the office will adjust in the coming months. By: Gavin Strube, Esq.
million new cancer incidences in India by 2025, public health priorities need to be realigned to ensure better access to treatment for all. Cancer incidences, approved drugs, and patents on them, to name a few. The last date for submitting your application is April 6. on 2 April, 2025 (Delhi High Court) Image from here.
Weve tried to represent a diversity of subject matter also in this list, so its a mixed bag of cases dealing with patents, trademarks, copyright law etc. Singh Note: Later in the year, the Delhi High Court tightened the scope of the rights under well-known trademarks in Vans Inc. Novex Communications Pvt Ltd v.
The firm's complaint, filed on March 28, 2025, names dozens of federal agencies and officials as defendants, including Coke Morgan Stewart in her official capacity as Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. 25-cv-917 (D.D.C.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content