Remove 2025 Remove Designs Remove Litigation Remove Settlement
article thumbnail

Supporting MSME

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

As India aims for a $5 trillion economy, the MSME ministry sets ambitious goals, aiming to elevate their GDP contribution by up to 50% by 2025. This made it intricate and perplexing for litigants, especially small business owners reliant on consistent cash flow.

article thumbnail

Guest Post: Sony fails in strike out claim against Hendrix bandmates

The IPKat

This New York action has been stayed pending resolution of the English litigation. This is an interesting legal question as the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (the CDPA) brought in new performers’ rights, even for earlier performances such as Mitchell’s and Redding’s subject to transitional provisions regarding prior contracts.

Copyright 108
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Year in Review: Top Regulatory Developments of 2023

LexBlog IP

The approval of Amgen’s WEZLANA (ustekinumab-auub) as biosimilar to Janssen’s STELARA (ustekinumab) is noteworthy given that it received designation as interchangeable. Janssen and Amgen settled their BPCIA litigation regarding Amgen’s ustekinumab biosimilar product in May 2023.

article thumbnail

Biosimilars 2020 Year in Review

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

The biosimilar pathway was designed to increase competition for biologics and reduce healthcare costs. Yet 2020 saw a slowdown in biosimilar activity with the lowest number of annual biosimilar approvals since 2016 and fewer product launches than 2019—as well as a decrease in district court litigation and post-grant proceedings.

article thumbnail

Navigating the USPTO’s Regulatory Wave: Key Comment Deadlines for Summer 2024

Patently-O

This wave of RFCs includes significant proposals aimed at adjusting patent fees for fiscal year 2025, refining terminal disclaimer practices, and addressing the impact of artificial intelligence on prior art and patentability. 325(d) considerations, parallel and serial petitions, and settlement-related terminations.

Art 44