This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
2025) offers continued guidance on whether authorship can be attributed to AI systems (i.e., non-humans) under CopyrightLaw. The recent decision in Thaler v. Perlmutter et al., 23-5233 (D.C.
Blog sought to study global moves or court cases that have taken place regarding uses of copyright in made-always-with-an-AI creation and provide discussion over possible solutions to the future of intellectual property laws. Copyright Office. Copyright Act regulates the works which are created by humans only.
Presently, a new reference from the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) asks the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) for vital interpretive guidance concerning the parody exception within copyrightlaw. This approach, initially applied to cultural politics by Dentith, can be similarly adopted within copyrightlaw.
Image by Martina Bulkov from Pixabay In March 2025 the New Zealand Supreme Court confirmed that copyright is relationship property, to be divided accordingly when a qualifying relationship ends. First , the Court confirmed copyright is personal property. It addressed these questions as follows. Toriqul Islam 135
Unveiling the Bond Between Artists and Their Work: A Vignette Study 38 Pages Posted: 12 Feb 2025 Last revised: 19 Feb 2025 Margaritha Windisch Date Written: January 31, 2025 Abstract This paper empirically measures the bond between artists and their work.
On 30 January 2025, the US Copyright Office (USCO) registered A Single Piece of American Cheese , a visual material generated by Invoke AI and with a technique called inpainting. Concluding remarks: AI-generated artworks or compilations?
As we enter a new year, we would like to take this opportunity to pass on our best wishes for 2025 to all of our readers, as well as reflect on developments in copyright over the past year. order to train their technologies, should AI companies be allowed to use works under copyright protection without consent?
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content