This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Solar Now Puerto Rico, LLC, 2025 WL 725078, NO. 6, 2025) A frivolous lawsuit against comparative advertising; the court gets the right result at least. Even if the marks were famous, the comparative advertising and parody exclusions applied. [W]hen Windmar PV Energy, Inc. 24-1570 (RAM) (D.P.R.
Alessandros Katpost on Lidl v Tesco here] The relevance of comparative advertising law has increased. The door being open to bad faith attacks on trade marks might undermine the principle that a trade mark does not need to have been put to genuine use in the first five years of registration.
2025 WL 438387, 24cv1646(DLC) (S.D.N.Y. 7, 2025) Previous discussion. Skillz sued its competitor Papaya, alleging false advertising under federal and state law. Here, Skillz allegedly made the challenged claims in video advertisements and on another page of its website, not on the same page. Skillz Platform Inc.
Here's what Anna Maria and Lorenzo write: Parasitic advertising on UEFA Euro 2020: Italian Competition Authority imposes first sanction for ambush marketing by Anna Maria Stein and Lorenzo Maniaci Ambush Kat By its decision No. 16 of 11 March 2020 ('Law-Decree No. 16/2020'), converted with amendments, by Law No. 31 of 8 May 2020 ('Law No.
The arbitral award dated February 28, 2025 , underscores the importance of accurate registrant information and reinforces that cybersquatting – even passive holding of infringing domains will not go unchecked. Concealment of registrant identity and non-participation in proceedings can work against the domain holder.
Call for Applications: SpicyIP Tech Innovation Policy Fellowship 2025 (Apply by February 23) Attention IP and tech enthusiasts! We are very excited to announce the SpicyIP Tech Innovation Policy Fellowship 2025! The defendant had applied for registration of the ASTELLAZ PHARMACEUTICALS mark to which the plaintiff filed an opposition.
[Sponsored] CRISP (BITS Law School) Invites Applications for Innovation Law and Policy Fellowship (1 April 2025) Centre for Research in Innovation Law for Shared Prosperity, BITS Law School is inviting applications for their Innovation Law and Policy Fellowship. The last day to send your applications is April 1, 2025.
24-30111, 2025 WL 586820 (5 th Cir. 24, 2025) District courts denial of preliminary injunction discussed here. It has a 2018 registration for those services for the stylized wording RAMPART RESOURCES to the right of a graphic image of a road going into the horizon, with a road curving off to the right and left of the main road.
Less than one month after oral argument, the Board sustained this opposition to registration of DON'T MESS WITH TEX-MEX for restaurant service, finding confusion likely with the registered mark DON'T MESS WITH TEXAS for paper food containers, paper bags, and cups. 91264923 (March 7, 2025) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas L.
Case Summaries Ktc India Pvt Ltd vs M/S Himalayan Nomad Ktc And Ors on 8 January, 2025 (Delhi District Court) The present suit was filed by the plaintiff seeking relief of permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark. The plaintiff had acquired numerous registrations in India for the MARRIOTT and MARRIOTT formative marks.
billion in 2025. They also take refuge under the exception granted for comparative marketing, making reference to the luxury product solely as a point of comparison in their advertising. Several luxury brands, including Tom Ford, Chanel, and Dior, annually invest millions into developing and marketing their signature perfumes.
It includes many rules, several of them directed at the language of business in Quebec, and some regarding the use of French on both product packaging and signage/advertising. Amendments to the Charter are expected to come into force on June 1, 2025. Fines for second offences are doubled and thereafter tripled.
Invisible Narratives claims the following: Next Level fraudulently obtained copyright registrations, filed trademark applications, registered the skibiditoilet.com domain (Infringing Site), and released applications on Apple and GooglePlay with the name Skibidi Toilet included. Next Level Apps Technology FZCO , 2025 WL 551866 (N.D.
TTAB Sustains eBay's Section 2(d) Opposition to AFREBAY & Design for Advertising and Payment Processing Services TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Recent 2(d) Appeals Turn Out? [Yes] TTABlog Test: Are Nail Polish Strengtheners Related to Dietary Supplements? Yes] TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Recent 2(d) Appeals Turn Out? Guess What?
The manager defensively referred to the plaque as a ‘manifestation’ since the plaque referenced ‘Michelin 2025,’ implying an upcoming Michelin award! Sanghvi questioned how the restaurant could have obtained such a plaque, implying that it misrepresented itself as a Michelin-recognised establishment.
on 14 February, 2025, (Delhi HC) Manash Lifestyle Pvt. Holding the registration to be in violation of Sections 9, 11, and 18 of the Act, the court directed the trademark registry for the cancellation of the respondents mark. vs Www.Tatapowersolardealership.Co.In & Ors on 13 February, 2025 (Delhi HC) Image from here.
on 14 February, 2025, (Delhi HC) Manash Lifestyle Pvt. Holding the registration to be in violation of Sections 9, 11, and 18 of the Act, the court directed the trademark registry for the cancellation of the respondents mark. vs Www.Tatapowersolardealership.Co.In & Ors on 13 February, 2025 (Delhi HC) Image from here.
In fact, the website advertises [n]o commitments. I note that cellphone companies frequently advertise “no contract” as part of their come-ons (when what they really mean to say is that there’s no minimum term to the contract), and this is like nails-on-chalkboard to a contracts law nerd. . 2025 WL 630813 (9th Cir.
CGPDTM Announces Dates for 2025 Trademark and Patent Agent Exams Dates for Trademark and Patent Agent Exams 2025 have been announced by the CGPDTM. The Trademark Agent Exam is likely to be held on January 04, 2025 and the Patent Agent Exam is likely to be held on January 5, 2025.
91281244 (January 31, 2025) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Elizabeth A. Opposer owns several decades-old registrations for DIOR. Welch 2025. The Board declined to reach opposer's likelihood of confusion or dilution-by-tarnishment claims. This blog post will attempt to hit the highlights. Christian Dior Couture, S.A.
In a 55-page decision, the Board granted a petition for cancellation of registrations for the mark VIVACE for a "radio frequency microneedling device" on the ground of non-ownership. 92074719 (February 14, 2025) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cheryl S. Welch 2025. This blog post will attempt to hit the high points.
The judgment in Abbott v Sinocare [2025] EWHC 206 (Ch) , handed down earlier this month, demonstrates this difficulty, and the attempt to use shape marks to protect against similar products. That evidence included the volume of sales, Abbotts market share, and extensive advertising.
90045780 and 90045814 (January 2, 2025) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas L. And one criterion for registration on the Principal Register is that the proposed mark is distinctive. Welch 2025. In re Audemars Piguet Holding SA , Serial Nos. Casagrande). The other solid lines must be 86'd. Text Copyright John L.
The Board affirmed a Section 2(e)(5) functionality refusal to register the product configuration shown below, for "fire extinguishing preparations," finding that applicant's advertising and its utility patents "establish the functional benefits of Applicant's proposed mark." "The Welch 2025. In In re Mars, Inc., [Ser. 3d at 1375)."
97602791 (March 18, 2025) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas L. Lack of Distinctiveness: Although Section 2(e)(5) is an absolute bar to registrability, the Board, in the interest of completeness, considered the alternative ground of lack of distinctiveness. Kason spent approximately $34,480 on advertising. Welch 2025.
The CAFC upheld the TTAB's decision [ TTABlogged here ] granting petitions for cancellation of two registrations on the Supplemental Register for the color pink applied to the entire surface of hip joint implants, on the ground of Section 2(e)(5) functionality. January 3, 2025) [precedential]. Welch 2025. CeramTec GmbH v.
3d -, 2025 WL 948334 , No. Common indicators suggesting that a word or phrase might be viewed by the public as a trademark include large font relative to surrounding text, all capital letters or initial capitals, distinctive print style, use of color, and prominent position on a label or in an advertisement. Medical Depot, Inc.
97503026 (February 21, 2025) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Elizabeth A. Generally, the applications (or registrations) description of the goods and services adequately defines the genus." Applicant BRTM pointed to 33 third-party use-based registrations for jewelry, all of which have the term ROSE in the registered mark.
2:25-cv-01429-CV (ADSx), 2025 WL 632983 (C.D. 26, 2025) Pepperdine sued Netflix for Lanham Act trademark infringement, contributory infringement, dilution, false advertising, and coordinate state claims based on Netflixs Running Point series, which depicts a team known as the Waves. Pepperdine University v. Netflix, Inc.,
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content