Remove 2025 Remove Advertising Remove Branding
article thumbnail

Retromark 2025: Event Report (Part 1 - the write-up)

The IPKat

Panel 1: It looks like lookalikes are no longer liked: has the Court of Appeal moved the dial in favour of brand owners? Alessandros Katpost on Lidl v Tesco here] The relevance of comparative advertising law has increased. Overall, there was a strong sense that the dial has shifted in favour of trade mark owners and brands.

article thumbnail

[Guest post] Parasitic advertising on UEFA Euro 2020: Italian Competition Authority imposes first sanction for ambush marketing

The IPKat

Here's what Anna Maria and Lorenzo write: Parasitic advertising on UEFA Euro 2020: Italian Competition Authority imposes first sanction for ambush marketing by Anna Maria Stein and Lorenzo Maniaci Ambush Kat By its decision No. 16 of 11 March 2020 ('Law-Decree No. 16/2020'), converted with amendments, by Law No. 31 of 8 May 2020 ('Law No.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (March 3 – March 9)

SpicyIP

[Sponsored] CRISP (BITS Law School) Invites Applications for Innovation Law and Policy Fellowship (1 April 2025) Centre for Research in Innovation Law for Shared Prosperity, BITS Law School is inviting applications for their Innovation Law and Policy Fellowship. The last day to send your applications is April 1, 2025.

article thumbnail

Copy-Paste Perfumes? The Legal Battle Over Fragrance Dupes

Intepat

INTRODUCTION A distinct scent has immense recall value and the potential to become a powerful identifier of a brand. Several luxury brands, including Tom Ford, Chanel, and Dior, annually invest millions into developing and marketing their signature perfumes. billion in 2025.

Copying 59
article thumbnail

Putting bad faith to bed: Wakefit reclaims its domain

Selvam & Selvam Blog

The arbitral award dated February 28, 2025 , underscores the importance of accurate registrant information and reinforces that cybersquatting – even passive holding of infringing domains will not go unchecked. The company also owns the domain wakefit.co , which clearly pre-dates the disputed domain.

article thumbnail

materiality surveys may not need controls

43(B)log

14-MD-2542 (VSB), 2025 WL 354671 (S.D.N.Y. 30, 2025) This is a ruling on 19 motions to exclude expert testimony in this case, which is mostly an antitrust case; I will focus only on some false advertising-relevant rulings. brewer works only with Keurig brand or licensed pods) but some did not (e.g.,

article thumbnail

Delhi High Court Orders Amazon to Pay Rs. 339 Crore Damages: A Wake-Up Call for E-Commerce Giants on Counterfeit Goods

Selvam & Selvam Blog

In a landmark ruling on February 25, 2025, the Delhi High court ordered Amazon to pay a hefty Rs. This case highlights the intersection of trademark law and e-commerce regulation, raising questions about the accountability of online marketplaces in protecting brand integrity. The Plaintiffs LifeStyle Equities C.V. crore (USD 33.78