LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 14, 2024

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) may change how we invent: many envision a collaborative approach between human inventors and AI systems that develop novel solutions to problems together. Such AI-assisted inventions present a new set of legal issues under patent law. On February 13, 2024, the U.S. 101 and 115.

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Patent Designs 52

Patently-O

JUNE 23, 2024

— (June 20, 2024), a case focusing on the constitutionality of the Mandatory Repatriation Tax (MRT). For Thomas, judicial invention is a synonym to judicial activism and antithetical to his approach that looks primarily to historic preservation, especially when interpreting the U.S. 1221 (2024) (Thomas, J., Constitution.

Invention 44

Invention Inventor Patent Licensing 44

The IPKat

FEBRUARY 14, 2024

On 12 February 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced with a press release the publication of its Inventorship Guidance for AI-Assisted Inventions (Guidance). The Guidance has been published and will be effective from 13 February 2024.

Invention 81

Invention Publishing Inventor Designs 81

JD Supra Law

MAY 21, 2024

On May 16, 2024, the Tokyo District Court (the “Court”) found that an artificial intelligence (“AI”) that autonomously generated an invention cannot be recognized as the inventor of that invention. The Court also expressed its hope that the legal issues addressed in the case would be settled through future legislation.

Inventor 61

Inventor Invention Patent 61

JD Supra Law

APRIL 22, 2024

On April 17, 2024, I had the honor of moderating an online panel entitled “Promoting Inventor Equity in Patenting”—part of the OHSU Innovates series hosted by the OHSU Technology Transfer office and OHSU Collaborations and Entrepreneurship team. By: Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Inventor 61

Inventor Patent Invention Technology 61

IP Tech Blog

MARCH 5, 2024

The Guidance, for USPTO examiners and applicants, addresses inventorship and the use of AI, including generative AI, in the inventive process. The Guidance provides illustrative examples in which AI systems play different roles in the inventive process, to show how the USPTO will analyze inventorship issues.

Invention 57

Invention Inventor Patent Patent Application 57

LexBlog IP

MARCH 5, 2024

The Guidance, for USPTO examiners and applicants, addresses inventorship and the use of AI, including generative AI, in the inventive process. The Guidance provides illustrative examples in which AI systems play different roles in the inventive process, to show how the USPTO will analyze inventorship issues.

Invention 52

Invention Inventor Patent Patent Application 52

Patently-O

APRIL 25, 2024

The Initiative will be hosting its second conference at Emory University Law School in Atlanta on Friday, September 20, 2024. And which innovators become inventors? of inventors. What explains this innovator-inventor gap , the reduced rate at which underrepresented innovators become inventors?

Inventor 62

Inventor Invention Patent Patent Application 62

IP Intelligence

FEBRUARY 23, 2024

Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) released its much anticipated Inventorship Guidance on AI-Assisted Inventions (“Guidance”). [1] 1] The Guidance is retroactive, meaning it applies to all patent applications and issued patents filed before, on or after February 13, 2024. In Thaler v. 4] Based on U.S. 4] Based on U.S. 6] Section IV.A

Invention 52

Invention Inventor Patent Application Designs 52

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 14, 2024

The USPTO released inventorship guidance on February 12, 2024, for inventions assisted by artificial intelligence (AI). The Federal Circuit previously held that an AI system cannot be listed as an inventor in Thaler v. Simply owning or overseeing an AI system used in the creation of an invention. Vidal , 43 F.4th

Invention 52

Invention Inventor Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property 52

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 21, 2024

Inventors and patent practitioners filing patent applications before U.S. patent application has a duty to disclose to the USPTO all information which is materially relevant in assessing the patentability of the invention. On February 13, 2024, the U.S. On February 13, 2024, the U.S. 101 and 115.

Invention 52

Invention Inventor Patent Application Patent 52

The IPKat

FEBRUARY 13, 2024

The updated EPO Guidelines for Examination will enter into force on 1 March 2024. The main updates this year reflect the recent decisions from the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) in G2/21 (Evidence standard for inventive step/plausibility) and G 1/22 (Entitlement to priority). A draft version of the Guidelines can be previewed here.

Invention 67

Invention Art Inventor Designs 67

IP Close Up

JANUARY 3, 2024

IP CloseUp, weekly perspective on intellectual property trends and business, broke through 392,000 views and 272,000 visits in 2023, on its way to 400,000 plus Continue reading

Intellectual Property 90

Intellectual Property IP Inventor Invention 90

The IPKat

AUGUST 13, 2024

Further reading Artificial intelligence is not breaking patent law: EPO publishes DABUS decision (J 8/20) (July 2022) Bad cases make bad law: Has DABUS "the AI inventor" actually invented anything?

Patent 124

Patent Editing Inventor Patent Application 124

Intellectual Property Law Blog

FEBRUARY 28, 2024

200, passed in 1980, streamlined and relaxed federal government policy regarding patent rights to inventions developed with federal grant money. The funding agency obtains a license to “subject inventions,” which is defined as “any invention. . . The invention of the patent at issue in the case ( U.S. 35 U.S.C. §

Licensing 130

Licensing Invention Government Inventor 130

The IPKat

JULY 3, 2024

in Germany First of all, some hot-off-the-press news: the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) has just published its decision on AI inventorship, substantially concluding that a human contribution (not necessarily inventive) is invariably needed, even for AI-generated inventions. For further information and to register, click here.

Intellectual Property Law 64

Intellectual Property Law IP Patent Law Invention 64

The IPKat

AUGUST 4, 2024

Updated Guidance for AI inventions: Step 2A, Prong 1 Prong 1 of Step 2A asks whether the claim in question is directed to "a judicial exception". The Guidance first notes that claims to AI inventions will often involve "abstract ideas" such as mathematical concepts, methods of organising human activity or mental processes.

Invention 70

Invention Inventor Patent Journalism 70

JD Supra Law

FEBRUARY 14, 2024

12, 2024, regarding the use of artificial intelligence (AI) while developing new inventions. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit previously held that an AI system cannot be named as an inventor on a patent, but its opinion left open the…. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued new guidance on Feb.

Inventor 63

Inventor Invention Trademark Patent 63

The IPKat

JUNE 10, 2024

Nonetheless, with limited avenues available for broad antibody inventions in the US, Chamberlain suggests that means-plus-function language is worth a shot. The written description requirement necessitates the invention to be adequately described in the specification. Furthermore, the question of enablement was not reviewed.

Invention 64

Invention Art Patent Law Law 64

U.S. Department of Commerce

JUNE 21, 2024

Commerce's USPTO Announces National Strategy to Empower Innovators and Entrepreneurs from All Communities June 21, 2024 KCPullen@doc.gov Fri, 06/21/2024 - 12:19 Intellectual property New plan to increase diversity and participation in STEM, inventorship, and innovation The Commerce Department’s U.S. of all inventors named on U.S.

Inventor 106

Inventor Intellectual Property Government IP 106

IP.com

JUNE 27, 2024

In May, 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced the launch of a new strategic plan focused on a dedicated support of inclusive innovation within organizations across the nation, connecting more Americans with resources to spur innovation and entrepreneurship. of all inventors named on U.S.

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Reporting Technology 52

SpicyIP

JULY 8, 2024

10 Days to the 2024 Shamnad Basheer Essay Competition Deadline! Another reminder for our eligible readers as only 10 days remain for the deadline of the 2024 Shamnad Basheer Essay Competition! It argued that the D1 and D3 teaches away from the invention and D5 was not relevant for the present case.

Invention 59

Invention Art Trademark Patent Application 59

Trading Secrets

MARCH 15, 2024

2024), a case that may reshape the dynamics between trade secrets and patent rights. The Core Issue at Hand This case centers around the America Invents Act (AIA) and whether a product’s prior sale by the patent applicant can disqualify the patenting of the method used to produce said product. v ITC, 22-1827 (Fed.

Invention 52

Invention Patent Confidentiality Patent Application 52

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 21, 2024

The USPTO issued inventorship guidance and examples for AI-assisted inventions. The guidance, which went into effect February 13, 2024, makes clear that AI-assisted inventions are not categorically unpatentable. A link to the Federal Register where the guidance has published can be found here.

Invention 40

Invention Inventor Patent Application Publishing 40

SpicyIP

APRIL 30, 2024

By Kevin Preji On 28th Feb, 2024, the Delhi High Court in Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC vs Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs in allowing an appeal, clarified the role of the ‘person skilled in the art’ (‘PSITA’) in determining non-obviousness. The claimed invention contained the sensor service which was absent in the prior art.

Invention 97

Invention Art Designs Design 97

Patently-O

JANUARY 9, 2024

by Dennis Crouch The text of pre-AIA Section 102(a) suggests that an inventor’s own prior publication qualifies as invalidating prior art, even if within the 1-year grace period. Oral arguments were held January 8 2024, and a decision is expected later this year. 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)(pre-AIA). ” In re Katz , 687 F.2d

Inventor 48

Inventor Art Invention Patent 48

LexBlog IP

MARCH 15, 2024

2024), a case that may reshape the dynamics between trade secrets and patent rights. The Core Issue at Hand This case centers around the America Invents Act (AIA) and whether a product’s prior sale by the patent applicant can disqualify the patenting of the method used to produce said product. v ITC, 22-1827 (Fed.

Invention 52

Invention Patent Confidentiality Patent Application 52

LexBlog IP

MARCH 13, 2024

2024), a case that may reshape the dynamics between trade secrets and patent rights. The Core Issue at Hand This case centers around the America Invents Act (AIA) and whether a product’s prior sale by the patent applicant can disqualify the patenting of the method used to produce said product. v ITC, 22-1827 (Fed.

Invention 52

Invention Patent Confidentiality Patent Application 52

SpicyIP

JUNE 29, 2024

Notably, in The Hindu, Jacob Koshy published back-to-back articles, with the first one appearing on June 22, 2024 (read here (paywalled)). In this article, Koshy reveals that Bharat Biotech (BBIL) filed a patent application for Covaxin without listing the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) as a co-patentee or inventor.

Patent Application 64

Patent Application Inventor Patent Intellectual Property 64

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 8, 2024

On January 5, 2024, in litigation between REGENXBIO and Sarepta Therapeutics, Judge Richard Andrews of the U.S. A trial was scheduled to begin on January 29, 2024. The Court also wrote that the non-AAV sequences or other elements of the claimed invention have not been altered from the naturally occurring counterparts.

Litigation 52

Litigation Patent Inventor Invention 52

The IPKat

MAY 20, 2024

Comments are due by 29 June 2024. Tian Lu updated readers on the fate of the DABUS patent applications in China, where the invalidity of the patent application was recently upheld on the grounds that an ‘AI system’ cannot be defined as the inventor. Details here.

Invention 60

Invention Art Patent Application Inventor 60

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 28, 2024

§200, passed in 1980, streamlined and relaxed federal government policy regarding patent rights to inventions developed with federal grant money. The funding agency obtains a license to “subject inventions,” which is defined as “any invention. The invention of the patent at issue in the case ( U.S.

Licensing 52

Licensing Invention Government Inventor 52

Patently-O

AUGUST 5, 2024

Kaijet highlights the narrowness of the pre-filing grace period (safe harbor) provision under the America Invents Act (AIA) and serves as a reminder that there are a number of patents that would have been valid under the pre-AIA patent system may no longer be valid under the current law. July 31, 2024). Sanho Corp. 2023-1336 (Fed.

Invention 109

Invention Inventor Art Public Use 109

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 29, 2024

On January 10, 2024, the USPTO published guidelines for assessing enablement in view of Amgen v. § 112(a) that the specification must describe the invention in such terms that one skilled in the art can make and use the claimed invention.” Sanofi and other recent court cases (“the Guidelines”).

Publishing 52

Publishing Invention Art Inventor 52

SpicyIP

JANUARY 31, 2024

Image from here Yesterday, Aparajita penned a post “ Squawking over butter chicken: The mystery of the real master chef” sharing her thoughts on the existing “Who Invented Butter Chicken and Dal Makhani” issue before the Delhi High Court in Rupa Gujral & Ors vs Daryaganj Hospitality Private Limited. ” As per the order (para.

Inventor 64

Inventor Ownership Reporting Registration 64

Patently-O

MARCH 4, 2024

by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit held oral arguments on March 4, 2024 in the important patent case of Celanese Int’l. Historically, an inventor could choose to protect a new manufacturing process either by patenting it or by keeping it as a trade secret – but not both. v ITC , 22-1827 (Fed. Gore & Assocs.,

Patent 40

Patent Invention Inventor Patent Application 40

Patently-O

APRIL 21, 2024

2024), gives me pause to consider more general eligibility issues of AI Inventions. When does the design or creation of AI system elements qualify as an eligible invention? Therefore, that limitation could not supply the inventive concept required to transform the claims into patent-eligible subject matter. 4th __ (Fed.

Invention 70

Invention Technology Patent Drafting Patent 70