Remove 2024 Remove Confidentiality Remove Invention
article thumbnail

Latest Federal Court Cases - August 2024

JD Supra Law

July 31, 2024) In our Case of the Week, the Federal Circuit held that the private but non-confidential sale of thousands of laptop ports did not count as a “public disclosure” of the inventions embodied therein. Kaijet Technology International Limited Inc., 2023-1336 (Fed. By: Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Narrows AIA Grace Period: Public Disclosure Must Make Invention ‘Reasonably Available’

Patently-O

Kaijet highlights the narrowness of the pre-filing grace period (safe harbor) provision under the America Invents Act (AIA) and serves as a reminder that there are a number of patents that would have been valid under the pre-AIA patent system may no longer be valid under the current law. July 31, 2024). Sanho Corp. 2023-1336 (Fed.

Invention 111
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (September 23-September 29)

SpicyIP

(Over) Expanding the Circle: DHC Allows In-house Employees to Access Confidential Documents in InterDigital v. Oppo Recently, the DHC in InterDigital v Oppo set a rather intriguing precedent by allowing access to in-house employees to the confidentiality club documents. Case Summaries Mankind Pharma Limited v. Muhammad Ali.

Trademark 105
article thumbnail

The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in India’s Startup Ecosystem: A Pathway to Innovation and Growth.

IIPRD

The legal frameworks surrounding IP, including the patents, trademarks, copyrights, and business enigmas bargain the startups the aptitude to protect their intellectual assets, ensuring their thoughts and the inventions are lawfully saved from unlawful use or imitation. The Startups have filled more than 12000 applications between 2016-2024.

article thumbnail

Guest Post by Profs. Masur & Ouellette: Public Use Without the Public Using

Patently-O

And when an invention is in use by a member of the public (rather than the inventor), it is blackletter law that the use can be “public use” even if it takes place entirely in secret, behind closed doors. In addition, it is also blackletter law that the use need not enable the invention to constitute prior art. forthcoming 2024).

article thumbnail

The IPKat EPO Boards of Appeal Year in Review 2023

The IPKat

Another source of confusion is the divergent approaches of the UK courts and the EPO with respect to the test for the evidence standard in sufficiency and inventive step analysis. Plausibility demystified - a review of EPO case law before G 2/21 G 2/21: Is the technical effect embodied by the invention as originally disclosed?

Invention 112
article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (November 25 – December 1)

SpicyIP

With 60.10% of cases from IPAB disposed till June, 2024, the IPD has done notable work since its formation. Arun Kumar vs State Of Punjab And Another on 25 November 2024 (PH&HC) In this case, the petitioner was accused of offences under Sections 63 and 65 of the Copyright Act and Sections 103 and 104 of the Trade Marks Act.