Remove 2024 Remove Advertising Remove Marketing Remove Registration
article thumbnail

Falsely advertising "ghost guns" as legal in NY is actionable

43(B)log

Arm or Ally, LLC, 2024 WL 756474, No. 23, 2024) The AG sued sellers of “unfinished frames and receivers” — also known as “80% lowers” or “receiver blanks” —designed to evade restrictions on gun sales. Defendants contended that marketing unfinished frames and receivers as “legal” was protected by the First Amendment. It was not.

article thumbnail

TIL: “Texas Tamale” Is an Enforceable Trademark–Texas Tamale v. CPUSA2

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

This case hit my alerts because of its discussion about keyword advertising, but first, I have to digest how the court got there. We usually get ours at the local farmers market.] ” But the trademark registration was over 5 years old, so it had become “incontestable.” Yum, and easily veganized. ” Uh oh.

Trademark 100
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Reusing Social Media Photos for Ads? Be Careful!–Khachatryan v. 1 Hotel

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

It then went further and used the photo to promote the robe: In 2023, Sunny Khachatryan obtained a copyright registration for “Brave’s” photo. Other arguments fail because “there is value in Minor Plaintiffs’ image and likeness, which Defendants then used for the purpose of commercial advertising and sales.

article thumbnail

Peru sets a limit of five years on rights in a well-known trademark

Garrigues Blog

When this period has elapsed, it will be necessary to submit the requisite proof demonstrating that the trademark continues to enjoy its reputation in the market A well-known mark is one which is widely disseminated and recognized by the consumer public in a specific sector, in response to its particular qualities when compared to the competition.

article thumbnail

TTABlog Test: Are Cigarettes and Cigars Related to Alcoholic Beverages Under Section 2(d)?

The TTABlog

91244891 (April 11, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. Oddly, Opposer pleaded 35 registrations, 27 of which have been cancelled. The Board focused on one of the pleaded, live registrations, as noted above. Welch 2024. How do you think this came out? Nemiroff Intellectual Property Establishment v.

article thumbnail

TTAB Sustains Instagram's 2(d) Opposition to INSTASIZE for Photo Editing Software

The TTABlog

In a 95-page opinion, the Board sustained this opposition to registration of the mark INSTASIZE for "Downloadable mobile applications for photo editing," finding confusion likely with the registered mark INSTAGRAM for "Downloadable computer software for modifying the appearance and enabling transmission of photographs." Welch 2024.

Editing 64
article thumbnail

TTAB Sustains 2(e)(1) Opposition, Finding WOOLWAX Merely Descriptive of Lubricants

The TTABlog

The Board sustained this opposition to registration of the proposed mark WOOLWAX for "corrosion inhibitors in the nature of a coating; rust preventatives in the nature of a coating" and for "all purpose lubricants," on the ground of mere descriptiveness under Section 2(e)(1). Welch 2024. Not good enough, said the Board. Opposition No.