This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Yesterday, it was all about key developments in the copyright field in the Africa IP Highlights 2023 – the result of collaboration between myself and several IP practitioners and researchers across Africa: Clarisse Mideva ; Rita Chindah ; and Jessie Mgonga. Today, it’s about the trade marks. Katpost on the decision here.
In a non-precedential ruling, the CAFC affirmed the TTAB's decision [ TTABlogged here ], granting a petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark CAPTAIN CANNABIS for comic books, on the ground of likelihood of confusion with Petitioner Laverne J. Andrusiek's identical common law mark, also for comic books.
In a less than enlightening decision, the Board affirmed a refusal to register the proposed mark shown below as a servicemark for "casinos" and "hotel, restaurant and bar services," finding that the mark "is not an inherently distinctive source identifier and therefore, fails to function as a servicemark for Applicants services."
Section 4 of the Trademark Act provides for registration of a collective membership mark, defined as a trademark or servicemark adopted by a collective and used by members to indicate membership in the collective. 90019480 (February 17, 2023) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. Welch 2023.
Introduction The year 2023 was a high for Indian cinema- with the love of the country for the big screen soaring high with box office numbers. These registrations aid in allocating precedence. The problems arises that mere registration is not enough to grant legal protection, which is why the copyright becomes a necessity.
90641690 (November 21, 2023) [precedentia] (Opinion by Judge Jonathan Hudis). Sections 1, 2, 3, and 45 of the Lanham Act provide the statutory basis for a refusal to register subject matter that does not function as a trademark or servicemark. 1578, 2023 USPQ2d 677, at *5 (2023) (cleaned up). Welch 2023.
2023/2024) In a non-precedential 2023 decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) refusing to register “ Everybody vs Racism ” as a trademark for apparel, tote bags, and services promoting racial justice advocacy. In re GO & Associates , 22-1961 (Fed. See, TMEP § 1202.04(b)
Applicant argued that the Office's evidence - some 14 third-party uses of the phrase and its variants - was insufficient to show how the mark is perceived by the general public. 90976324 (May 5, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Jonathan Hudis). As we note above, some third-party uses are servicemark uses.
Applicant UNIP (apparently owned in part by LeBron James) counterclaimed for cancellation of that registration on the ground of likelihood of confusion. 91244990 (December 14, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Mark A. Welch 2023. The sole issue for the Board was priority, and UNIP came in first. Game Plan, Inc.
CHRISTMAS became a registered trademark for “Christmas Ornaments and Decorations of the Non-Electrical Type” way back in 1966 (Registration No. ” Scrooge wasn’t the only one who had that idea: a business owner registered ALWAYS CHRISTMAS & Design as a servicemark in 1995 (Registration No.
The Board affirmed a refusal to register the proposed mark WE’RE HERE TO HELP WITH YOUR LEGAL NEEDS! finding that the phrase fails to function as a servicemark for "legal services." 4th 1354, 2023 USPQ2d 1337 (Fed. In re Richard M. LLC , 90 F.4th See 15 U.S.C. §§ 1052, 1053.
In a whopping 82-page opinion, the Board affirmed the USPTO's refusal to register PARKING.COM , on either the Principal Register or the Supplemental Register, as a servicemark for “website providing information regarding parking availability." 87906630 (August 11, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Elizabeth A.
In an exhaustive and exhausting decision, the Board sustained an opposition to registration of the mark HME in the stylized from shown below, for various types of pipes and other building products, finding confusion likely with opposer's mark KME for overlapping goods. Welch 2023. KME Germany GmbH v. Zhejiang Hailiang Co.,
The Board affirmed a refusal to register the proposed mark EXPERIMENTAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES for “Dietary and nutritional supplements” on the ground that the mark is used solely as a trade name to identify applicant's business and therefore is not registrable. 2023) and cases cited therein. 15 U.S.C. § In re Univar Corp.,20
In a precedential decision the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) affirmed a refusal to register a character featured in a video game on the grounds that the proposed design mark failed to function as a trademark. 97115036 (August 28, 2023). Color was not claimed as part of the mark. [1] In re Joseph A.
This Kat is pleased to review the “ Overlapping Intellectual Property rights ”, edited by Neil Wilkof [full disclosure: a member of the IPKat team], Shamnad Basheer, and Irene Calboli (OUP, 2023, 864 pp.). The fictitious German inventors want to commercialise their invention, yet do not have sufficient funds to seek patent registration.
It also produced documents during discovery supposedly disclosing an event held prior to April 2021 in the United States but shown to be referencing a 2023 event in Shanghai China. Opposer DoorDash alleged likelihood of confusion with eight registered DOORDASH marks for various goods and services, including food delivery.
13, 2023) , the Federal Circuit affirmed the TTAB’s refusal to register the mark EVERYBODY VS RACISM because it failed to function as a trademark. In order to qualify for federal trademark registration under the Lanham Act, a mark must be able to function as a source identifier. 140 (2023). LLC, 599 U.S.
14, 2023) [not precedential]. The CAFC observed that "[i]f the nature of a proposed mark would not be perceived by consumers as identifying the source of a good or service, it is not registrable," citing TMEP § 1202.04(b) 2579 (2023)). Welch 2023. In re GO & Associates, LLC , Appeal No. 2022-1961 (Fed.
14, 2023, re-designated as precedential, January 22, 2024). The CAFC observed that "[i]f the nature of a proposed mark would not be perceived by consumers as identifying the source of a good or service, it is not registrable," citing TMEP § 1202.04(b) 2579 (2023)). Welch 2023. 2022-1961 (Fed. 2022), cert.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content