This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
I’m sure this ruling won’t the last one in this case or in Loomer’s broader litigation campaign. Zuckerberg , 2023 WL 6464133 (N.D. The post Laura Loomer Loses Litigation (Again)–Loomer v. The post Laura Loomer Loses Litigation (Again)–Loomer v. Case Citation : Loomer v. The complaint.
Stroud is General Counsel at Unified Patents – an organization often adverse to litigation-funded entities. [1] litigation finance boom of the past 20 years—as has been widely reported, private equity now undergirds huge swaths of U.S. Guest post by Jonathan Stroud. Patent assertion finance today is a multibillion-dollar business. [2]
My roundup of the top Internet Law developments of 2023: 10) California court bans targeted advertising (?). However, those arguments were more theoretical than empirical; there weren’t a lot of high-profile examples of a mass-market consumer service deploying this strategy. In 2023, the EU launched its Digital Services Act.
“Defendant immediately removed the infringing Photo upon having learned of it, [] made an offer of judgment in the amount of $2,500 in September 2023, and [] later conceded liability so as to advance the termination of this action.” However we get there, the overall litigation enterprise here makes no economic sense.
To determine whether the use constitutes fair use or not is determined based on a number of factors like if they primarily include the purpose and character of the use, the nature of the copyrighted work, the amount used, and the effect on the market for the original work. Another important factor is market effect. Google, Inc.
Katfriends Adrian Aronsson-Storrier and Oliver Fairhurst from Lewis Silkin report on recent litigation in the UK against the developers of AI generation software. This litigation has arisen amongst a flurry of recent interest in AI generated works. What is AI image generation software?
The variety is marketed under the trade mark Envy or . Envy launched in the Chinese market in late 2023, thanks to a 2018 licensing deal with the Joy Wing Mau fruit company. But in addition to this authorised grower, ENZAFruit learned of unauthorised production and sales.
An important part of the amendment is the introduction by Article 76 of the patent linkage system in China – a system for litigation of drug patents prior to market entry of generics, similar to that provided by the Hatch Waxman Act in the US. On June 1, 2021, the Fourth Amendment to the Chinese Patent Law became effective.
In the recent UK case of Philip Morris v BAT [2023] EWHC 2616 (Pat) , His Honour Justice Hacon (Hacon HHJ) considered the standard for invalidity due to added matter. Case Background: "Heat not burn" Philip Morris (PM) and BAT both market so-called "heat-not-burn" devices as alternatives to conventional cigarettes. Smoke Free World. "
Registration records, however, can only provide one piece of the puzzle because registration is not mandatory for copyright protection (though it is necessary to go to court over infringement of a US work or to seek certain types of compensation in litigation).
This case is crucial to understand not only the novel concept of Confidentiality Clubs in the Indian IP Litigation but also the issues with regard to the composition of such clubs and the accessibility of the members to confidential information vis-a-vis independently appointed Scientific Advisor. It noted that Serial No.
2023) , the Federal Circuit once again granted a writ of mandamus , ordering a patent infringement case to be transferred out of Judge Albright’s courtroom in the Western District of Texas (WDTX). states, including Texas, is no stranger to litigation in the Lone Star state. This decision was made under the provisions of 28 U.S.C.
Merpel does not like this form of taxi Friend of the Kat and Legal Head of Delivery for Gett in Moscow, Konstantin Voropaev has been following some developments out of Kazakhstan relating to an uptick in litigation in the taxi-app space. So the market is busy, growing and lucrative. The patent is valid until 21 December 2023.
On July 10, the Senate unanimously passed the Affordable Prescriptions for Patients Act of 2023 (S.150), 150), which seeks to increase competition and lower drug prices by imposing limits on patent litigation related to biological products. By: Knobbe Martens
Brussels Court of Appeal, 30 January 2023, Biogen v. The Court notably considered that such harm would be more difficult to quantify than the harm caused to the patentee in the absence of a PI, as it cannot be evaluated how many generic products might have been sold if the generic company had been able to enter the market.
Goldsmith in the days following the Supreme Courts 2023 landmark fair use decision. Judge Bibas acknowledged this in his original 2023 summary judgment ruling, stating that whether Rosss copying was transformative “depends on the precise nature of Rosss actions. A case with potentially limited impact.
Ordinarily, hiring an attorney should improve the success rate; but not in this litigation genre. Both pro se and attorney-represented litigants fail equally when it comes to suing services over their editorial discretion. 2023 WL 2414258 (N.D. Alphabet appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Alphabet Inc.
As 2023 commences, it’s time for companies to review and take stock of their intellectual property assets. For trademarks, a good place to start is the company’s marketing and promotional materials, website, mobile app, and social media. Intellectual property is a company asset, just like inventory.
Amsterdam Kat The IPKat has learned that on, 22-24 January 2023, the Pharma and Biotech Patent Litigation Summit will return to the Anantara Grand Hotel Krasnapolsky in Amsterdam (Netherlands). A UPC Litigation Forum will take place on 22 January too. The IPKat has negotiated a special discount for readers.
The judge did side with the airline on its copyright infringement claim, ruling that Skiplagged had used American’s flight symbol logo without permission as recently as August 2023. A good example comes from a case I litigated years ago on behalf of Costco. Skiplagged’s disclosures about “hidden city” ticketing.
I’m pleased to share a draft of a new paper, “ A SAD New Category of Abusive Intellectual Property Litigation.” To that end, I am giving a couple of public talks on the paper: Tarrant County Bar Association , Texas A&M Law School, Fort Worth, TX, March 27, 2023. Free RSVP! I would welcome yours.
Each of these cases is unique, fact dependent, and likely, if fully litigated on the merits, to shed light on different aspects of copyright law. The post Some Thoughts on Five Pending AI Litigations – Avoiding Squirrels and Other AI Distractions appeared first on Copyright Clearance Center. Case 1- Doe 1 v. GitHub Inc.,
Nezar Saeed Hammo allegedly acted as Alfa’s marketing manager while Mohammed Abu Oun was identified as the company’s general manager. Then on May 21, 2021, Alfa TV marketing manager Nezar Saeed Hammo filed for bankruptcy in Florida. On January 10, 2023, a stipulation was filed jointly by DISH and defendants Alfa TV Inc.,
On November 8, 2023, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. in the district court for the northern district of West Virginia, asking the Court to block Celltrion’s biosimilar product “CT-P42” – Celltrion’s proposed biosimilar of Regeneron’s drug Eylea® (aflibercept) – from entering the United States market. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.
In this article, we provide a further update on developments regarding biosimilars in Canada (approvals, pending submissions, litigation, regulatory, and market access) since our March 2023 update. By: Smart & Biggar
In March 2023, Health Canada granted tentative approval for YESAFILI 2 mg vials, subject to resolution of any patent disputes. patent litigation related to biosimilars of EYLEA (aflibercept) can be found on the Big Molecule Watch’s BPCIA Litigation Tracker. Extensive cover of U.S.
2023-1027 (Fed. This case highlights a significant divergence between the evidentiary standards for proving prior art status in district court litigation versus AIA trials. This case highlights a significant divergence between the evidentiary standards for proving prior art status in district court litigation versus AIA trials.
” This is the kind of argument only a pro se litigant would make in 2023. ” 22 years later, I guess we’re still litigating that conclusion. Zotos , 2023 WL 3946827 (11th Cir. June 12, 2023) The post Of Course Section 230 Applies to Amazon Reviews–McCall v. Case citation : McCall v.
The court disagrees: Meta operates online services across the globe—even Wise Guys consist of users located throughout the United States—so Meta included this forum-selection clause limiting litigation to California, its principal place of business. 2023 WL 8434452 (N.D. 4, 2023) Also noted: Reaud v. 2023 WL 8455206 (D.
It is theoretically possible that bounty-based private litigation is the best way to enforce a law, but in practice those situations are rare or non-existent. LeBlanc , 2023 WL 6464768 (E.D. LeBlanc , 2023 WL 6464768 (E.D. LeBlanc appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. The scheme has countless downsides.
2023 WL 7109914, No. Bluegreen sued a lot of entities, but only the marketing defendants remained in the case: their role was “to advertise timeshare exit services by promoting a legitimate process to exit timeshare contracts while protecting the customers’ credit.” In a particularly “yikes” bit, one marketing defendant 1990.
Microsoft on Monday February 6, 2023, and the CAFC issued its opinion in the case this past Thursday. market for the China-controlled multinational. I attended the hearing at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in Maalouf v. This case has curious origins. In other words, a U.S.
Or was this just a ploy to find any tenable legal theory against YouTube so it could be exploited in future litigation? YouTube appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Is it possible that he didn’t keep copies of his own videos? Or did he want the users’ comments for some reason? ” Cites to Daniels v.
In this article, we provide a further update on developments regarding biosimilars in Canada (approvals, pending submissions, litigation, regulatory, market access and competition) since our last update in June 2022. By: Smart & Biggar
A “patent cliff” refers to the end of IP protection for a drug that has enjoyed market exclusivity since its launch. Various types of regulatory exclusivity can occasionally lengthen the protection for drugs, but generally when a drug loses patent protection we begin seeing generic competitors on the market.
You’d think that if that claim is your strongest/only claim, you’d go ahead and give up, but I’m not a litigator so what do I know? Practice pointer: YouTube’s lawyers should have scrubbed this language if they reviewed it rather than adding it when there’s pending litigation on this very point).
Adding another leaf to the FCM patent litigation saga, the Delhi High Court on September 19 refused to grant an interim injunction to Vifor considering the launch of the Biological E’s product in the market. Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd , the order dated April 11, 2023, in the case of Vifor (International) Ltd.
Even pro se litigants typically recognize these cases are doomed and rarely file them any more. 2023 WL 7165042 (D. Nextdoor appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Massachusetts’ anti-SLAPP law is old-school and narrow, so Nextdoor didn’t have the option to invoke anti-SLAPP protection.
Implications In the ARK case, I wrote: “Section 230 as a basis for removal isn’t a new issue; Cisneros is directly on point and from 2005; but the question has not been litigated frequently. Xcentric Ventures LLC , 2023 WL 2316200 (S.D. March 1, 2023) The post Ripoff Report Gets a Pricey Lesson on Section 230–Selker v.
Jason Fyk’s recent litigation campaign reminds me of the classic story Moby Dick, with Fyk in the Captain Ahab role and Section 230 as his white whale. The court says the issue of standing to challenge 230’s constitutionality was already litigated and decisively resolved in AFDI v. 2023 WL 3933719 (D.D.C.
” This is the latest entry in the confusing jurisprudence about when 230 applies to first-party marketing representations that are rendered untrue by users’ activities. However, this case’s litigation approach is problematic. Snap appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Despite Doe v.
There are no such facts in the present litigation, which concerns defendants’ decisions to remove, restrict, or demonetize plaintiffs’ videos. Google, LLC, 2023 WL 218966 (N.D. Google appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Case Citation : Divino Group, LLC v.
I wouldn’t be surprised to see Davis’ future marketing claim that a federal judge has praised him as “sophisticated” LOL. This will produce litigation tsunamis and likely inhibit content moderation decisions that promote healthy communities. 2023 WL 4670491 (E.D. 2023 WL 4764813 (D.N.J.
Image from here On 24 July, 2023 the Delhi High Court had passed a detailed order in Vifor v. Explaining the nitty gritty of these types of claims, the court refused to grant an injunction to Vifor (the plaintiff) and allowed the defendants to launch their products in the market.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content