Remove 2023 Remove Inventor Remove Patent Drafting
article thumbnail

What Does it Mean to be an Inventor? The Inventor Diary Project and Kicking off the Diversity Pilots Initiative Blog Series

Patently-O

Though the patent system exists to promote innovation, it also serves to promote inventors and innovators. For more visit, For more stories, and to add your own story , visit the “Inventor’s Diary” at www.diversitypilots.org. What did becoming an inventor mean to you? ” – Sujesha S., ” – Scott S.,

article thumbnail

[Sponsored] Registration Deadline Extended for the “Comprehensive Course on Patents” Organized by The IP Press In Collaboration with S. Majumdar & Co. (October 5-November 23)

SpicyIP

(October 5-November 23) Following a favorable outcome of preparing students and professionals for the patent agent exam and providing them with a comprehensive guide on Patents in 2022 and 2023. The IP Press presents the third cohort of the Comprehensive Course on Patents.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

IP strategy for AI-assisted drug discovery

The IPKat

Another downside to a solely patent-orientated approach to protecting platform IP is the time and resources associated with drafting and prosecuting a patent application. The complicated nature of AI technology means that any patent draft is likely to need a heavy degree of input from the inventors.

IP 56
article thumbnail

AI Visualize and the Eligibility of Innovative AI Systems

Patently-O

Datzov, The Role of Patent (In)Eligibility in Promoting Artificial Intelligence Innovation , 92 UMKC L. 1, 4 (2023). AI Visualize had asserted four related patents that facilitated use of a low-bandwidth web portal for visualizing 3D/4D medical scans. ” Nikola L.

article thumbnail

Narrowing the Analogous Arts with a Problem-Solution Statement

Patently-O

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s sided with the patentee, holding that a key prior art reference was not analogous art. By including “enabling trick play functionality” in every claim, the ‘792 patent restricted the field of endeavor and pertinent prior art to references focused on trick play features.

Art 56
article thumbnail

The Analogous Art Doctrine Post-KSR: Insights from the Federal Circuit’s Daedalus Decision

Patently-O

8,671,132 (‘132 patent) unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 2023-1313, slip op. DivX, LLC , explicitly articulating the problem solved by the invention (perhaps within the patent claims themselves) can limit the field of endeavor and pertinent prior art to references addressing that particular problem. Daedalus Blue LLC v.

Art 69
article thumbnail

Double Patenting in Canada

LexBlog IP

the Federal Court suggested that the preferred approach to the question of double patenting is an “ informed middle ground. Where an inventor can trace the origin of the divisional back to a direction of the Commissioner, it will be immune from double patenting attacks. of the Patent Act if they maintain the objection.

Patent 52