article thumbnail

G 2/21 applied to software inventions (T 0687/22)

The IPKat

The EPO Board of Appeal decision in T 0687/22 confirms beyond doubt the relevance of G 2/21 to software inventions. The decision in T 0687/22 links the case law from G 1/19 and G 2/21 to highlight t he importance of establishing a credible technical effect of software invention. Headnote II).

article thumbnail

The UPC's first decision on infringement by equivalence (Plant-e v Bioo, UPC_CFI_239/2023)

The IPKat

In Plant-e v Bioo the UPC provided its first decision addressing the doctrine of equivalents in patent infringement proceedings ( UPC_CFI_239/2023 ). Case details: Plant-based fuel cells The dispute in UPC_CFI_239/2023 concerned EP2137782 , owned by Plant-e Knowledge B.V.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

The criteria for the novelty and inventive step of pharmaceutical selection inventions (T 1356/21)

The IPKat

The case related to the novelty and inventive step of a second medical use claim. The Board of Appeal considered the appropriate application of EPO case law on the novelty of dosage regimes and selection inventions, and the reliance on an unexpected technical effect for inventive step.

Invention 122
article thumbnail

G 2/21 does not permit armchair inventing (T 0258/21)

The IPKat

The recent decision in T 0258/21 , by contrast, is the first interpretation of G 2/21 leading to a finding of a lack of inventive step in view of an inadequate disclosure of the purported technical effect. However, T 0258/21 related to subject matter for which the EPO has always required additional evidence.

Invention 122
article thumbnail

Kappos at PTAB Masters 2023: The PTAB Simply ‘Hasn’t Worked Out’ as Intended

IP Watchdog

During the PTAB Masters 2023 program, which was held this week on Tuesday and Wednesday at IPWatchdog’s headquarters in Ashburn, Virginia, former U.S. Kappos was Director during the enactment and implementation of the America Invents Act (AIA), which established the PTAB.

Invention 126
article thumbnail

Guidance on Patenting Inventions with AI Contributions

Patently-O

The following are my remarks given on April 25, 2023 to the USPTO as part of their AI listening session: by Dennis Crouch Members of the USPTO, and fellow participants of this AI Listening Session, thank you for inviting me here today and for taking time to consider these important issues.

Invention 126
article thumbnail

Ironburg Inventions Ltd. v. Valve Corp. 21-2296 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 3, 2023)

Intellectual Property Law Blog

Background In 2015, Ironburg Inventions Ltd. . § 315(e)(2); and (2) the “skilled and diligent searcher” inquiry itself with respect to what a skilled and diligent searcher reasonably would have been expected to discover. Ironburg”) sued Valve Corporation (“Valve”) for infringing U.S. 8,641,525 (“the ’525 patent”).

Invention 130