This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
1] And since, the creator, consumer and subject of the content are distinctly different-the potential lack of empathy or misapprehension by the consumers towards the subject, based on the creators potrayal, necessitate a discussion of the subjects privacy and personalityrights.
This article delves into these aspects in detail, exploring the nuanced intersections of data privacy and intellectualproperty within AI. Data Privacy The recent uproar for some stringent data privacy laws stems from the frequent leaks and breaches of individuals’ personal data and the risk of its misuse. Rajagopal v.
The development of Artificial Intelligence, from being able to create edited photos to now generating deepfake videos that cannot be distinguished from real videos, has created an imminent threat to intellectualpropertyrights and personalityrights specifically. Image Sources: Shutterstock] In D.M.
Codible Ventures LLP that has initiated a judicial discussion on the protection of artists’ personalityrights against the unauthorised use of their voices by AI tools. Moreover, both in the EU and the US, privacy laws also come into play alongside intellectualproperty protections.
At the same time, the Italian Ministry of Culture has published new “Guidelines for the determination of the minimum amounts of fees and charges for the concession of use of property handed over to state institutes and places of culture of the Ministry of Culture ( Ministerial Decree of April 11, 2023, No.
This Kat is pleased to review the “ Overlapping IntellectualPropertyrights ”, edited by Neil Wilkof [full disclosure: a member of the IPKat team], Shamnad Basheer, and Irene Calboli (OUP, 2023, 864 pp.). The analysis is offered from the US, the UK, and the EU perspectives.
Started in 2018, the 2nd edition of Overlapping IP Rights (OUP) was brought to completion in 2023 by his co-editor, the inimitable Prof Neil Wilkof, along with Prof Irene Calboli who came on as a co-editor following Prof Basheer’s demise. You can find Sabeeh’s previous posts here ). Without further ado – the review!
Recently, Bollywood Director Karan Johar [1] filed a case against the makers of “Shaadi Ke Director Karan Aur Johar” for using his name in the title of their movie without permission, this lawsuit has sparked again the debate relating to personalityrights in India. Topps Chewing Gum Inc. [2] Rajagopal v.
Recent court decisions have clarified the scope of copyright in film screenplays, personalityrights, and underlying works concerning content creation and licensing in broadcasting. and undoubtedly creating such content includes the distribution of any intellectualpropertyrights to their respective authors.
As 2023 comes to an end, in line with our annual tradition, we take stock of the top IP developments that occurred this year. We have also included a list of other notable IP developments of 2023. The Court delineated instances like parody and satire where free speech in the context of well-known persons may be protected.
Behind that success was a masterclass in intellectualproperty. He also understood the power of his own story, safeguarding his image through personalityrights and exercising control over how his likeness was used. In 2023, Sony Pictures released Big George Foreman , a biopic chronicling his extraordinary life.
With a passion for the dynamic intersection of law, media and technology, she is particularly interested in exploring intellectualproperty and tech policy. The PersonalityRights Conundrum The issue of personalityrights, however, leads us to a slightly trickier terrain. Baby Gift House & Ors.
The article endorses an intellectualproperty approach to understand the right and its infringement. This is achieved by understanding the parallels between publicity right and trademark law. Towards the end, the article contemplates whether India really needs a sui generis legislation on publicity rights or not.
Other Posts Free Certificate Course in Application of IntellectualPropertyRights for Startups and Entrepreneurship [November 22- 23] Free Certificate Course in Application of IntellectualPropertyRights for Startups and Entrepreneurship on November 22 and 23. Capital General Store and Jawed Ansari v.
In a recent decision, AFNIC, the French country-code top-level domain name registrar, transferred the rights to the domain name ‘porcelainefrancaisedelimoges.fr’ to the owners of the French geographical indication (GI) ‘Porcelaine de Limoges’ (decision FR-2023-03612 ). In its allegations to AFNIC, the plaintiff invoked two rights.
With a first instance ruling issued on 20 April 2023, the Court of Florence has ordered Condé Nast (editor of GQ Italy) to pay EUR 50,000 plus interest as compensation for damages arising from the unauthorized use of the image of the David by Michelangelo.
Highlights of the Week Announcing the 2024 Shamnad Basheer Essay Competition on IntellectualProperty Law Prof (Dr.) on 15 May, 2024 (Delhi High Court) Image from here The present suit was filed by the plaintiff, a Hindi film actor, alleging infringement of his personalityrights, trademarks, and copyright by different defendants.
ABSTRACT There has been a dramatic increase in the commercial use of celebrity personalities by people not authorized to do so compared to the earlier times. Protecting personalityrights has become a growing problem in India due to deepfakes, morphed pictures, etc. Interesting right? Puttaswamy v.
Regarding personalityrights and introducing a public interest test before granting protection to celebrities, Rebecca Cardoso, in this guest post, advocates for a balanced approach prioritizing protection against genuine harm instead of trivial grievances. Navigating PersonalityRights Does Fame Have a Trade-Off?
In the third part of his three part post on personalityrights, Akshat discusses the real implications of granting broad personalityrights to celebrities. He did his LLM from Berkeley Law in 2023 specialising in IP and Tech law. Part I and II of this post can be accessed here and here.
T Series And Another vs M/S Dreamline Reality Movies on 22 February [Punjab and Haryana High Court] The case concerned the adaptation of late Jaswinder Kaurs biography into a cinematographic film and deals with interplay of copyright with personalityrights. This goes against the caveat in Strix v. WIPO Adopts Two Treaties!
SpicyIP Tidbit: GII 2023 – India Retains its 40th Rank India ranks 40th in the Global Innovation Index, 2023! Image Rights Alright—But Can They Trump Established Rights and Doctrines? Image Rights Alright—But Can They Trump Established Rights and Doctrines? Should They? Read the post by Prof. Defendant no.
Here is our recap of last week’s top IP developments including summary of the posts on posthumous rights of artists, and book reviews of “Modern Law of Copyright in Singapore” and “Overlapping IntellectualPropertyRights (2 nd Ed.). This and a lot more in this week’s SpicyIP Weekly Review. Anything we are missing out on?
In a “Jhakaas” (a slang for fantastic) news for the actor Anil Kapoor, Delhi High Court granted the actor an interim injunction against use/ misuse of his personalityrights. Image from here Image Rights Alright—But Can They Trump Established Rights and Doctrines? Simply none. Anil Kapoor one being the latest.
He did his LLM from Berkeley Law in 2023 specialising in IP and Tech law. Image from here [Part II] The Right to Publicity: 31 Years Since Madow’s Scathing Verdict, Yet…… The Show Must Go On? Akshat is a practicing litigator working at Saikrishna and Associates. His previous posts can be found here. By Akshat Agrawal C.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content