This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
2023 WL 2918724, No. 12, 2023) Following a large verdict for Monster on falseadvertising claims, this opinion discusses extensively the requirements for injunctive relief in falseadvertising cases. Plus, they hadn’t removed existing falseadvertising from their socialmedia accounts.
30, 2024) (R&R) Recommendation: Dastar should block Qingdao’s Lanham Act falseadvertising counterclaims based on Lashify’s claim to be the originator of lash technology, but false patent marking counterclaims should survive. 11, 2023 (claiming that various products were “patented”). 1, 2017 to Apr.
Defendants allegedly copied key components of Trackman’s copyrighted software and falsely suggested, in promotions and advertisements, that defendants were authorized to use the well-known courses in their game. Although the court dismissed a contract claim, copyright and falseadvertising claims survived.
2023 WL 2433970, -- F. 9, 2023) Roblox runs a “digital world where users create virtual games and experiences and connect with other users.” Roblox Corp. 22-cv-04476-SI (N.D. Users interact with the platform through virtual characters known as “Avatars.” This was enough survive the motion to dismiss.
A couple of specifics: The falseadvertising claims don’t escape 230: “Had those third-party users refrained from posting harmful content, Plaintiffs’ claims that Defendants falselyadvertised and misrepresented their applications’ safety would not be cognizable.” Case citation : Bride v. The complaint.
As 2023 comes to an end, in line with our annual tradition, we take stock of the top IP developments that occurred this year. We have also included a list of other notable IP developments of 2023. The judgement was passed in October 2022, but was uploaded in September 2023 on the High Court’s website. A special thanks to Mr. G.
2023 WL 8292459, No. 17, 2023) Super-interesting holding that, while there’s no patent field preemption against bringing false patent marking claims under the Lanham Act, Dastar (as expansively interpreted to cover falseadvertising claims) does preclude such claims, possibly only because of party argument.
Cornelia, 2023 WL 6379449, No. 29, 2023) “This action arises out of a series of interviews published on YouTube and conducted by Cornelia that plaintiffs perceive as defamatory.” Cornelia published a series of videos entitled “Authentic or Charlatan” in which he claims to expose “fake gurus on socialmedia.”
Cooperative Regions of Organic Producer Pools, 2023 WL 3856722, No. May 19, 2023) Plaintiff sued defendant, which does business as Organic Valley, under the CLRA and UCL, challenging labels on milk that say: 1. Dictionary definitions of “social” didn’t “provide a usable standard for defining a social cow.
LLC, 2023 WL 3066119, No. 24, 2023) “This case arises out of alleged misuse of copyrighted images, eventually leading to a dispute … that resulted in false business reviews, malicious e-mails, and mutual efforts to interfere with each other’s business.” I Dig Texas, LLC v. Creager Servs., 22-CV-0097-CVE-JFJ (N.D.
2023 WL 2372059, No. 14, 2023) Plaintiffs sued defendants for state and federal trademark infringement and related claims. World Axe Throwing League, Inc. Cold Steel Inc., 2:20−cv−11407 JAK (Ex) (C.D. First, nominative fair use permits only the “truthful use of a mark.” Toyota, 610 F.3d 3d at 1177.
2023 WL 3829689, No. 5, 2023) Hicks alleged that defendant, a California agricultural corporation, misrepresented the environmental impact of its farming practices through its advertising and “Inaugural Report on Environmental, Social and Governance Actions.” Grimmway Enters., 22-CV-2038 JLS (DDL) (S.D.
CV 22-00163-MWF (SKx), 2023 WL 6787827 (C.D. 6, 2023) EMAX is a cryptocurrency project centered around the EthereumMax, which can be traded, spent, or otherwise transacted between token holders. I’ll focus, as usual, on the falseadvertising bits and ignore the securities law parts. In Re Ethereummax Investor Litig.,
2023 WL 3046592, No. 21, 2023) In two opinions on the same day, the court dealt with various IP/falseadvertising claims brought by one litter box seller against another. 2023 WL 3049106, No. effective at eliminating viruses and bacteria was also plausibly falseadvertising. Purlife Brands, Inc.,
2023 WL 7109914, No. Bluegreen sued a lot of entities, but only the marketing defendants remained in the case: their role was “to advertise timeshare exit services by promoting a legitimate process to exit timeshare contracts while protecting the customers’ credit.” Bluegreen Vacations Unlimited, Inc. Timeshare Lawyers P.A.,
The court certified a question to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court: Under what circumstances, if any, is material publicly posted to socialmedia platforms inherently unknowable for purposes of applying the discovery rule in the context of defamation, right to publicity, right to privacy and related tort claims?
2023 WL 3556053, No. May 19, 2023) Whereas the timeshare falseadvertising cases might be making law largely applicable to other timeshare cases, what’s going on in the strip club advertising cases might have somewhat broader implications. Exotic Island Enters., 21-2149-cv, F.4th 4th - (2d Cir. 59 Murray Enters.,
10, 2023) Nike sued over StockX’s use of Nike trademarks on StockX NFTs without Nike’s consent and alleged sales of counterfeit Nike sneakers despite allegedly guaranteeing that all products sold by StockX were authentic. Nike, Inc. StockX LLC, 2024 WL 3361411, No. 22-CV-0983 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y.
The policy excluded personal and advertising injury, including “publication, in any manner, of material that violates a person’s right of privacy,” disparagement, use of advertising ideas, and trade dress infringement, if such activities “arise out of or are part of ‘exhibitions and related marketing,’ ” which are broadly defined.
22-CV-02880 (HG), 2023 WL 6385346 (E.D.N.Y. Quoting “various socialmedia personalities who complained about the size and quality of Defendants’ products” didn’t change this result. “[W]hile Chimienti v. Wendy’s Int’l, LLC, No.
2023 WL 2574319, No. 20, 2023) The parties compete in the supplement market using direct marketing, so compete in both consumer supplement sales and in sales representative recruitment. Ariix LLC v. Usana Health Sci., 2:22-cv-00313-JNP-DAO (D. pitch the guide to end consumers.”
Nepute, 2023 WL 4623089 , No. 19, 2023) The US sued Nepute (a chiropractor) and Quickwork (a company of which he is a member/co-manager). for deceptive advertising of dietary supplements in violation of the FTCA and the COVID-19 Consumer Protection Act. 4:21-CV-437 RLW (E.D.
2:20-cv-01344-JAD-VCF , |2023 WL 4636917 ( D. 19, 2023) In what seems likely a missed opportunity due to insufficient investment in the defense, the court grants summary judgment against an argument that “Taser” is generic (quick quiz before reading further: what is the generic name for a Taser device?) Axon Enterprise, Inc.
26, 2025) Pepperdine sued Netflix for Lanham Act trademark infringement, contributory infringement, dilution, falseadvertising, and coordinate state claims based on Netflixs Running Point series, which depicts a team known as the Waves. 2023) (use of fictional tax preparation business name in Better Call Saul ). Netflix, Inc.,
Other materials, such as internal documents used to train sales representatives, were held not to violate falseadvertising laws at all as there was no evidence those materials were ever shown to any physician or consumer. Takeaway No. 6: Marketing to Students. The acts also include security obligations.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content