Remove 2023 Remove Designs Remove False Advertising Remove Registering Trademarks
article thumbnail

gray marketer's counterclaims against Toyota survive, but it still must defend itself

43(B)log

Allen Interchange LLC, 2023 WL 5206884, No. 14, 2023) This opinion deals only with Allen’s counterclaims. The Toyota parts sold by Allen Interchange and Toyota bear the same part number, and according to Allen Interchange, are identical in design, function, and quality. Allen Interchange LLC, 2023 WL 5207389, No.

article thumbnail

rebinding books doesn't create derivative works but may be actionable under Lanham Act

43(B)log

2023 WL 416080, No. Steeplechase has a copyright for the book, “Piano Book for Adult Beginners: Teach Yourself How to Play Famous Piano Songs, Read Music, Theory & Technique” and registered trademark rights in STEEPLECHASE ARTS & PRODUCTIONS for, among other things, music instruction books, including for the Piano Book.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Inter American Convention allows claims that Lanham Act makes dubious after Abitron; but what about Article III?

43(B)log

16-6576 (KM) (MAH), 2023 WL 4200169, -- F. 27, 2023) Industria sued Latinfood for trademark and copyright infringement; Latinfood counterclaimed for tortious interference against Industria and another counterdefendant Cordialsa. Industria De Alimentos Zenu S.A.S. Latinfood U.S. T]he one showed in the application is not mine.”

article thumbnail

5th Circuit holds that inquiries weigh less than lost sales but can still be evidence of actual confusion

43(B)log

4th -, 2023 WL 5735552, No. 6, 2023) Doctrinal evolution is so fascinating! Section 43(a) reaches more broadly; the court here applies Lexmark to both false advertising and trademark claims. Despite different fonts, colors, and design elements, a reasonable jury could find enough similarity to confuse.

article thumbnail

(c) ownership claim allows both (c) and Lanham Act claims on motion to dismiss

43(B)log

Lerner, 2023 WL 2664341, No. 28, 2023) Darger “was an artist who died in obscurity but whose work received significant posthumous acclaim.” The court denied a motion to dismiss on copyright and trademark etc. Estate of Henry Joseph Darger v. 22 C 03911 (N.D. claims; the latter trouble me for obvious Dastar reasons. [But