Remove 2023 Remove Designs Remove False Advertising Remove Ownership
article thumbnail

copying/explicit references let Roblox proceed with dubious (c) claim; Lego should be watching

43(B)log

2023 WL 2433970, -- F. 9, 2023) Roblox runs a “digital world where users create virtual games and experiences and connect with other users.” And Jazwares, Roblox’s licensee, lacked standing for copyright claims, but did have Lanham Act standing because that doesn’t require copyright or trademark ownership. Roblox Corp.

Copying 94
article thumbnail

court allows Nike's legal theories and most of its expert testimony against StockX's resales/NFTs

43(B)log

10, 2023) Nike sued over StockX’s use of Nike trademarks on StockX NFTs without Nike’s consent and alleged sales of counterfeit Nike sneakers despite allegedly guaranteeing that all products sold by StockX were authentic. Nike, Inc. StockX LLC, 2024 WL 3361411, No. 22-CV-0983 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Many of the physical items were Nike sneakers.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Inter American Convention allows claims that Lanham Act makes dubious after Abitron; but what about Article III?

43(B)log

16-6576 (KM) (MAH), 2023 WL 4200169, -- F. 27, 2023) Industria sued Latinfood for trademark and copyright infringement; Latinfood counterclaimed for tortious interference against Industria and another counterdefendant Cordialsa. Industria De Alimentos Zenu S.A.S. Latinfood U.S. T]he one showed in the application is not mine.”

article thumbnail

fake sponsored reviews are false even if review content is opinion

43(B)log

3d -, 2023 WL 1438718, No. 1, 2023) The FTC, joined by California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts, and New York, sued Roomster, an internet-based room and roommate finder platform, and related individuals. NY’s laws are territorial, prohibiting deceptive acts or false advertising conduct “in this state.”

article thumbnail

TM co-owner can't challenge uses authorized by other co-owners (bonus Lexmark reasoning)

43(B)log

Marshall, 2023 WL 6963661, No. 20, 2023) In 1991, Reed and defendants Marshall and Harris formed the recording group Jade, and in 1992 they signed an exclusive recording agreement with a now-defunct label, Giant. This is why co-ownership is disfavored in trademark—but co-ownership is not prohibited. H-21-3942 (S.D.

article thumbnail

(c) ownership claim allows both (c) and Lanham Act claims on motion to dismiss

43(B)log

Lerner, 2023 WL 2664341, No. 28, 2023) Darger “was an artist who died in obscurity but whose work received significant posthumous acclaim.” Copyright ownership: At this stage, the court accepted as true the allegation that Darger did not gift his works to the Lerners. Estate of Henry Joseph Darger v. 22 C 03911 (N.D.

article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2023

SpicyIP

As 2023 comes to an end, in line with our annual tradition, we take stock of the top IP developments that occurred this year. We have also included a list of other notable IP developments of 2023. The judgement was passed in October 2022, but was uploaded in September 2023 on the High Court’s website. A special thanks to Mr. G.

IP 112